Skip to main content

Beyond Darwin: The Potential of Recent Eco-Evolutionary Research for Organizational and Information Systems Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Theoretical studies that actually propose to use evolutionary paradigms in organizational/management studies are quite rare, as well as field studies explicitly adopting them. Moreover, these rare writings tend to refer to classical, “Darwin+Mendel+DNA” thought, surprisingly overlooking the last decades’ advancements in evolutionary research, although these recent studies are progressively explaining complex phenomena, which Darwin’s model did not encompass. This paper identifies three streams within recent evolutionary research, whose adoption may result in useful innovation for management, organizational and information system research. These streams of studies present evolutionary, ecological and social processes in an integrated fashion, providing strong frameworks to understand learning processes, procedure creation, flexibility, decision making, networks evolution, cooperation, and the role of relationships, moods and nonrational triggers in change processes. This paper suggests that deeper insights into these factors not only would let us better understand how organizations evolve, but would also give us hints for building organizations which are more compatible with human nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dieckmann U., Doebeli M. (2005). “Pluralism in Evolutionary Theory”. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:1209-1213 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nicholson, N.; White, R. (2006). “Darwinism – a new paradigm for organizational behavior?”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, pp. 111-119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nicholson, N. (2005) “Objections to evolutionary psychology:reflections, implications and the leadership exemplar”. Human Relations, 58 (3), 393-409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lawrence, P.; Nohria, N. (2002). Driven. The four drives underlying human nature, San Francicsco, Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nicholson, N. (2000). Executive Instinct: Managing the human animal in the information age, New York, Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aldrich, H.E. (1999). Organizations evolving. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hannan, M.T.; Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nelson, R.R.; Winter, S.G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change., cambridge, the Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baum, Joel A.C. (1999). “Organizational Ecology”. In Clegg S.r.; Clegg S.; Hardy C., Studying Organizations: theory and method, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Price, (2006). “Monitoring, reputation, and greenbeard reciprocity in a Shuar work team”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pierce, White, (2006). “Resource context contestability and emergent social structure: an empirical investigation of an evolutionary theory”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson, M. (2005). Family, Village, Tribe: the story of the Flight Centre Ltd. Melbourne, Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lorenz, K. (1966), On Aggression, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lorenz, K. (1973), Behind the Mirror. A search for a natural history of human knowledge, Harcourt Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lorenz, K. (1996), Innate bases of learning. In Pribram, K. H., and King, J., eds., Learning as Self-Organization. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Campbell, D.T.,(1966). Pattern matching as an essential in Distal Knowing, Holt, Rinehard & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brunswik, E. (1957) “Scope and aspects of the Cognitive problems”, in Bruner et al., Contemporary approaches to Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ciborra, C. and Willcocks, L. (2006), “The mind or the heart? It depends on the (definition of) situation”, Journal of Information Technology 21, 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ciborra, C. (2002). The Labyrinths of Information. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dreyfus, H.L. (1991). Being-in-the-World. The MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Seabright, P. (2004), The company of strangers: a natural history of economic life. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maier N.R.F. (1929). “Reasoning in White Rats”, in Comp. Psycol. Monogr., 6, p. 29 Reydon

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maier N.R.F. (1930), “Reasoning in Humans, I. On direction”, in J. comp. Psycol, 10, pp. 115-43.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brown, J.s.; Duguid, P. (1991). “Organizational learning and communities of practice. Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation”. Organization Science, 2,1, pp. 40-57.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jrgensen S.E. (ed.), (2008). Encyclopedia of Ecology, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Metz J.A.J., Mylius S.D., Diekmann O., (2008). “When Does Evolution Optimise?” Evolutionary Ecology Research 10:629-654

    Google Scholar 

  28. Brandt H., Ohtsuki H., Iwasa Y., Sigmund K. (2007). “A Survey on Indirect reciprocity”. In Takeuchi Y., Iwasa Y., Sato K. (eds): Mathematics for Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 21-51.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ferrière R. (1998). Help and You Shall be Helped”. Nature 393:517-519 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hauert C, Traulsen A, Brandt H, Nowak MA, Sigmund K. (2007). “The Emergence of Altruistic Punishment: Via Freedom to Enforcement”. Science 613:1905-1907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Henrich J., Bowles S., Boyd R.T., Hopfensitz A., Richerson P.J., Sigmund K., Smith E.A., Weissing F.J., Young H.P. (2003). “The cultural and genetic evolution of human cooperation”. In Hammerstein P. (ed): Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation, MIT Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 445-468.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nowak M.A., Sigmund K. (2005). “Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity”. Nature 437:1292- 1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nowak M.A., Sigmund K. (2007). “How Populations Cohere: Five Rules for Cooperation”. In May R.M., McLean A. (eds): Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications, Oxford UP, Oxford, pp. 7-16.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sigmund K., Nowak M.A. (2001).: “Evolution – Tides of Tolerance”. Nature 414:403 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sigmund K., Nowak M.A. (1996). “The Natural History of Mutual Aid”. In Stadler F. (ed): Wissenschaft als Kultur, Springer-Verlag, Vienna, pp. 259-272.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sigmund K. (1998), “Complex Adaptive Systems and the Evolution of Reciprocation”. Ecosystems 1:444-448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sigmund K. (2007). “Punish or Perish? Retaliation and Collaboration Among Humans”. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22:593-600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sigmund K.(2002). “The Economics of Fair Play”. Scientific American 286:82-87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Barney, J.B.; Hansen, M.H,.(1994). “Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage”. Strategic management Journal, 15, pp. 175-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Conner K.R.;Prahalad C.K. (1996). “A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge vs. opportunism”. Organizational Science, 7, pp. 477-501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Doney P.M; Cannon J.P. (1997). “An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships”. Journal of Marketing, 61, pp. 35-51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dyer J.H.; Singh H. (1998). “The relational view: cooperative strategies and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage”. The Academy of Management Review, 23,4, oct. 1998, pp. 660-679.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dercole F, Dieckmann U, Obersteiner M, Rinaldi S. (2008). “Adaptive Dynamics and Technological Change”. Technovation 28:335-348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Thomas A.C., Scholz, M. (2009). “Why Organizational Economy Is Not a Darwinian Research Program”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 39, No. 3, 408-439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Ricciardi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ricciardi, F. (2011). Beyond Darwin: The Potential of Recent Eco-Evolutionary Research for Organizational and Information Systems Studies. In: Carugati, A., Rossignoli, C. (eds) Emerging Themes in Information Systems and Organization Studies. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2739-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics