Advertisement

Digitization as an IT Response to the Preservation of Europe’s Cultural Heritage

  • Claudia Loebbecke
  • Manfred Thaller
Chapter

Abstract

This paper examines the potential for preserving Europe’s cultural heritage in a digital world. After an extensive literature review on the economics of museums and the digitization of cultural heritage, it highlights national and international political initiatives to create cooperative cultural heritage systems. As a mean of achieving global integration while simultaneously keeping institutional independence, this work proposes ‘Digital Autonomous Cultural Objects (DACOs)’ as reference architecture. This paper illustrates the contribution of DACOs with two real-life projects serving as proof-of-concept. Finally, the paper offers some ‘Lessons Learned’ and an outlook to wider preservation of Europe’s cultural heritage in the digital world.

Keywords

Digital Library Contingent Valuation Reference Architecture Digital World Role Base Access Control 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Loebbecke, C. (2004). Digitizing European Cultural Heritage: Opportunities and Challenges, E-Culture, U-Tourism, and Virtual Heritage Workshop, Washington D.C., USA, December.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Loebbecke, C., Thaller, M. (2005) Preserving Europe’s Cultural Heritage in the Digital World, European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Regensburg, Germany, May.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baumol, W. and Bowen, W. (1966). Performing Arts: The Economic Dilemma. The Twentieth Century, New York.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hutter, M. and Rizzo, I. (1997). Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage. Macmillan Press Ltd., Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Throsby, D. (1994). The Production and Consumption of the Arts: A View of Cultural Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 1-29.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blaug, M. (2001). Where are we now on cultural economics?. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15 (2), 123-143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peacock, A. (1969). Welfare Economics and Public Subsidies to the Arts. Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 37 (December). 323-35.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Montias, J. (1973). Are museums betraying the public’s trust? Museum News, 25-31. 9. Peacock, A. and Godfrey, C. (1974). The Economics of Museums and Galleries. Lloyds Bank Review, 111 (January), 17-28.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frey, B. and Pommerehne, W. (1989). Muses and Markets: Explorations in the Economics of the Arts. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heilbrun, J. and Gray, C. (2001). The Economics of Art and Culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and Culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weil, S. (2002). Making Museums Matter. Smithsonian Books, Washington.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robbins, L. (1994). Unsettled Questions in the Political Economy of the Arts. Journal of Cultural Economics, 18 (1), 67-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnson, P. and Thomas, B. (1998). The Economics of Museums: A research perspective. Journal of Cultural Economics, 22, 75-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Robbins, L. (1971). Unsettled Questions in the Political Economy of the Arts. Three Banks Review, 91, 3-19.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frey, B. (1994). Cultural Economics and Museum Behaviour. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 41(8), 325-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Hagan, J.W. (1995). National Museums: To Charge or Not to Charge?. Journal of Cultural Economics, 19, 33-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Steiner, F. (1997). Optimal Pricing of Museum Admission. Journal of Cultural Economics, 21, 307-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bailey, J. and Falconer, P. (1998). Charging For Admission to Museums and Galleries. Journal of Cultural Economics, 22, 167-177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schuster, J. M. (1998). Neither Public Nor Private: The Hybridization of Museums. Journal of Cultural Economics, 22, 127-150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meier, S. and Frey, B. (2003). Private Faces in Public Places: The Case of a Private Art Museum in Europe. Cultural Economics, 3 (3), 1-16.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    William, R. (1982). The Sociology of Culture.Fontana Paperbacks, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Keesing, F. (1958). Cultural Anthropology: The Science of Customs. Stanford.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fowler, P.J. (Ed.) (2003). World Heritage Cultural Landscapes. UNESCO World Heritage Center, Paris.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Feldstein, M. (1991). The Economics of Art Museums. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grampp, W. (1989). Pricing the Priceless. Art, Artists and Economics. Basil Books, New York.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grampp, W. (1996). A Colloquy about Art Museums: Economics Engages Museology. In: Ginsburgh, V. and Menger, P. (Eds.). Economics of the Arts: Selected Essays. Elsevier, Amsterdam et al., 221-254.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Baumol, W. and Bowen, W. (1965). On the Performing Arts: The Anatomy of their Economic Problems. The American Economic Review, 55 (2), 495-502.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Poor, P. and Smith, J. (2004). Travel Cost Analysis of a Cultural Heritage Site: The Case of Historic St. Mary’s City of Maryland. Journal of Cultural Economics, 28, 217-229.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    De La Torre, M. (2002). Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage. Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Connor, S. (1992). Theory and Cultural Value. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Throsby, D. (2003). Determining the Value of Cultural Goods: How Much (or How Little) Does Contingent Valuation Tell Us?. Journal of Cultural Economics, 27, 275-285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Frey, B. (1997). Evaluating Cultural Property: The Economic Approach. International Journal of Cultural Property, 6 (2), 231-246.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Navrud, S. and Ready, R. (2002). Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Edward Elgar, Northampton.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Huszar, P. and Seckler, D. (1974). Effects of Pricing a ‘Free’ Good: A Study of the Use of Admission Fees at the California Academy of Sciences. Land Economics, 69 (1), 1-26.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Martin, F. (1994). Determining the Size of Museum Subsidies. Journal of Cultural Economics, 18, 225-270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Forrest, D., Grime, K., and Woods, R. (2000). Is it Worth Subsidising Repertory Theatre?. Oxford Economic Papers, 52 (2), 381-397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ward, F. and Beal, D. (2000). Valuing Nature with Travel Cost Models: A Manual. Edward Elgar, Northampton.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82 (1), 34-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Smith, V. (1993). Nonmarket Valuation of Environmental Resources: An Interpretive Appraisal. Land Economics, 69 (1), 1-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rogers, J. (1995). The Economic Impact of the Barnes Exhibit. Final Report prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Tourism and Recreation. Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Throsby, D. and Withers, G. (1985). What Price Culture?. Journal of Cultural Economics, 9, 1-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Santagata, W. and Signorello, G. (2000). Contingent Valuation of a Cultural Public Good and Policy Design: The Case of ‘Napoli Musei Aperti’. Journal of Cultural Economics, 24, 181-204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Noonan, D. (2003). Contingent Valuation of Cultural Resources: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Literature. Journal of Cultural Economics, 27, 159-176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Waetzold, S. (1971). Museum und Datenverarbeitung. Zum Bericht der Arbeitsgruppe Museumsdokumentation. Museumskunde, 40.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hanappi-Egger, E. (2001). Cultural Heritage: The Conflict between Commercialisation and Public Ownership. Working Paper, Vienna Technical University, Vienna. www.oeaw.ac.at/ita/access/hanappi_egger_txt.pdf, download on September 22, 2004.
  47. 47.
    Dempsey, L. (2000). Scientific, Industrial and Cultural Heritage: A shared Approach: A research framework for digital libraries, museums, and archives, Ariadne Issue 22, www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue22/dempsey/intro.html
  48. 48.
    Luhmann, N. (1987). Soziale Systeme. Suhrkamp Publishing, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Barkley, J. (1995). Implementing Role Based Access Control Using Object Technology. First ACM/NIST Workshop on Role-Based Access Control, hissa.ncsl.nist.gov/rbac/rbacot/ titlewkshp.html.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ferraiolo, D. and Kuhn, R. (1992). Role-Based Access Control. Proceedings of the 15th NIST-NSA Nat. (U.S.) Computer Security Conf., 554-563.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Giuri, L. and Iglio, P. (1996). A formal model for role based access control with constraints. Proceedings of the Computer Security Foundations Workshop, IEEE Computer Society, Washington D.C., 136-145.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sandhu, R., Coyne, E., Feinstein, H., and Youman, C. (1996). Role-Based Access Control Models. Computer, 29 (2), 38-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Neumann, G. and Nusser, S. (1997). A Framework and Prototyping Environment for a W3 Security Architecture. Proceedings of Communications and Multimedia Security, Joint Working Conference IFIP TC-6 and TC-11, Athens, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ferraiolo, D., Kuhn, D., and Chandramouli, R. (2003). Role Based Access Control. Artech House, Norwood, MA.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lin, A. (1999). Integrating Policy-Driven Role Based Access Control with the Common Data Security Architecture.HP Laboratories Bristol HPL-1999-59.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Moffett, J. and Sloman, M. (1994). Policy Conflict Analysis in Distributed System Management. Journal of Organizational Computing, 4 (1), 1-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Noble, J. (1970). Museum Manifesto. Museum News, April, 27-32.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Weil, S. (1990). Rethinking the Museum: And Other Mediations. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Addison, A. (2001). Virtual heritage: technology in the service of culture. Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Virtual Reality, Archeology, and Culture Heritage, 343-354.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Goncalves, M.; Fox, E. and Watson, L. (2004). Streams, Structures, Spaces, Scenarios, Societies (5S): A formal model for Digital Libraries, portal.acm.org/citation.cfm, download on November 11, 2004.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    March, S. and Smith, G. (1995). Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 251-266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Walls, J., Widmeyer, G. and El Sawy, O. (1992). Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research, 3 (1), 36 – 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Doerr, M. (2003) The CIDOC conceptual reference module: an ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Magazine, 24 (3), 75-92.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Thaller, M. (2004b). A Note on the Architecture of Computer Systems for the Humanities. Dino Buzzetti, D. Pancaldi,, G. and Short, H. (eds.): Digital Tools for the History of Ideas, Office for Humanities Communication series, Vol. 17, 49-76, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CologneKoelnGermany
  2. 2.University of CologneKoelnGermany

Personalised recommendations