Advertisement

Framing the Role of IT Artefacts in Homecare Processes

  • Maddalena Sorrentino
Chapter

Abstract

Based on the preliminary results of a case study, this qualitative research explores the meaning of the technological decisions implemented by a voluntary care association, which we will call Gamma. A provider of home assistance to terminally ill patients living in Lombardy (Italy), Gamma recently introduced an IT artefact to support its socio-care teams, equipping all the members with a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) to remotely access the patients’ electronic medical files, which are then updated in real time after each home visit. The article uses organisation studies to respond to two questions: how is the relationship between the technological and the organisational choices shaped by the new device? In what terms does the IT artefact help make the difference, or influence the decision processes at the diverse levels? It is argued that the artefact enters the caring processes as an additional source of regulation. The PDA makes the difference in terms of broadening and extending the control exercisable by Gamma’s management, but also enables the care providers to affirm their autonomy.

Keywords

Palliative Care Personal Digital Assistant Care Giver Ambiguous Scenario Organisational Choice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cicchetti, A., et al. (2005) L’analisi dei Network Organizzativi nei Sistemi Sanitari: il caso della Rete di Emergenza della Regione Lazio. AIES, Associazione Italiana di Economia sanitaria. GenovaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Venturiero, V., et al. (2000) Cure palliative nel paziente anziano terminale. Giornale di Gerontologia, 48, 222-246Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maggi, B. (1990) Razionalità e benessere: studio interdisciplinare dell'organizzazione. Etas, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shah, S. 2001) Grassroots Computing: Palmtops in Health Care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(13), 1764-1769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thompson, J.D. (1967) Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill, New York 6. Cook, K., et al. (1983) A Theory of Organizational Response to Regulation: The Case of Hospitals. Academy of Management Review, 8(2), 193-205Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Masino, G.(2005) Le imprese oltre il fordismo. Carocci, Roma 8. Leavitt, H. and Whisler, T. (1958) Management in the 1980’s. Harvard Business Review, (Nov-Dec), 41-48.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cyert, R.M. and Kumar, P. (1994) Technology Management and the Future. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 41(4), 333-334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Markus, M.L. (1994) Finding a happy medium: explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life at work. ACM Transactions of Information Systems, 12(2), 119-149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kraemer, K. and Dutton, W. (1979) The interests served by technological re-form.Administration & Society, 11(1), 80-106Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hickson, D.J., Pugh, D.S. and Pheysey, D.C. (1969) Operations Technology andOrganisation Structure: An Empirical Reappraisal. Administrative Science Quarterly,14(3), 378-397Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Attewell, P. and Rule, J. (1984) Computing and Organizations: What we Know and Whatwe Don’t Know. Communications of the ACM, 27(12),1184-1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Markus, M.L. and Robey, D. (1988) Information Technology and Organizational Change:Causal Structure in Theory and Research. Management Science, 34(5), 583-598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Orlikowski, W. and Baroudi, J. (1991) Studying Information Technology inOrganizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions. Information Systems Research,2(1), 1-28Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sorge, A. and Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2004) The (non)sense of Organisational Change:An Essai about Universal Management Hypes, Sick Consultancy Metaphors, and Healthy Organisation Theories. Organization Studies, 25(7), 1205-1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maggi, B. (2003) De l'agir organisationnel: un point de vue sur le travail, le bien-être, l'apprentissage. Octarès, ToulouseGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ponte, D., Rossi, A. and Zamarian, M. (2009) Cooperative design efforts for the development of complex IT-artefacts. Information Technology & People, 22(4), 317-334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simon, H.A. (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. MIT Press.Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Myers, M.D. (2009) Qualitative Research in Business & Management. SAGEGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rebora, G. (1999) La valutazione dei risultati nelle amministrazioni pubbliche: proposte operative e di metodo. Guerini e Associati, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Masino, G. and Zamarian, M. (2003) Information technology artefacts as structuring devices in organizations: design, appropriation and use issues. Interacting with Computers, 15(5), 693-707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prgomet, M., Georgiou, A. and Westbrook, J.I. (2009) The Impact of Mobile Handheld Technology on Hospital Physicians’ Work Practices and Patient Care: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16(6), 792-801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tsoukas, H. (2005) Complex Knowledge. Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nicolini, D., Bruni, A. and Fasol, R. (2003) Telemedicina: una rassegna bibliografica introduttiva, in Quaderno n. 29. 2003, Dipartimento di Sociologia e ricerca sociale, Università degli Studi di Trento, TrentoGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Simon, H.A. (1997) Administrative Behavior. 4th ed. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Flick, U. (2002) An introduction to qualitative research. 2nd ed. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations