Advertisement

Information Models for Process Management – New Approaches to Old Challenges

  • Jörg Becker
Chapter

Abstract

Effective process management is an essential success factor for organizations. Especially the retail sector requires enterprises to implement lean and efficient processes to remain competitive. However, the implementation of an appropriate process management is a challenging and error-prone endeavor. As a major reason for this the lack of effective and comprehensible methods has been identified. Moreover, due to rising market dynamics, detailed knowledge of the internal business processes is crucial to develop competitive advantage. Market trends have to be identified and needs for action have to be established early to be prepared for market changes and to react accordingly. Therefore it is necessary that the company’s processes are transparent and starting points can be identified quickly. This article aims to provide an approach of how a company can record its processes in a meaningful way to be able to improve them goal-oriented.

Keywords

Business Process Detailed Process Retail Market Business Object Retail Sector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith, A.(1937). The Wealth of Nations, 1776. Canaan ed.,New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hammer, M.,and Champy, J.(1995) Business Reengineering. Die Radikalkur für das Unternehmen.; Frankfurt, New York; Campus-Verlag, 5. Aufl.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Imperatori, B., and De Marco, M.(2008). ICT and Changing Working Relationships: Rational or Normative Fashion? In D’Atri, A., De Marco, M., Casalino, N. (Eds) Interdisciplinary Aspects of Information Systems Studies, S. 105-114.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bandara, W., Gable, G. G., and Rosemann, M. (2005). Factors and measures of business process modelling: Model building through a multiple case study. European Journal of Information Systems, 14 ( 4), 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Recker, J.(2010). Opportunities and constraints: the current struggle with BPMN. Business Process Management Journal, 16 (1), 181-201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M., and Gallo, S. (2004). Conceptual Modelling – What and Why in Current Practice. In: P. Atzeni, W. W. Chu, H. Lu, S. Zhou, & T. W. Ling, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3288, pp. 30-42). Shanghai, China: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hadar, I.and Soffer, P.(2006). Variations in conceptual modeling: classification and ontological analysis. Journal of the AIS, 7 (8), 568-592.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Batini, C., Lenzerini, M., and Navathe, S. B.(1986). A Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Database Schema Integration. ACM Computing Surveys, 18 (4), 323-364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lawrence, R., and Barker, K.(2001). Integrating Relational Database Schemas using a Standardized Dictionary. In: Proceedings of the 2001 ACM symposium on Applied computing (SAC). Las Vegas.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Phalp, K.and Shepperd, M.(2000). Quantitative analysis of static models of processes. Journal of Systems and Software 52 (2-3), 105-112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vergidis, K., Tiwari, A.,and Majeed, B.(2008). Business process analysis and optimization: beyond reengineering. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 38 (1), 69-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Becker, J., Breuker, D., Pfeiffer, D., and Räckers, M.(2009). Constructing Comparable Business Process Models with Domain Specific Languages – An Empirical Evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Verona (Italy), 1-13.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clegg, B., and Shaw, D. (2008). Using process-oriented holonic (PrOH) modelling to increase understanding of information systems. Information Systems Journal, 18 (5), 447-477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosemann, M.(2006). Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part A. Business Process Management Journal, 12 (2), 249-254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosemann, M.(2006). Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part B. Business Process Management Journal, 12 (3), 377-384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Batini, C., and Lenzerini, M.(1984) A Methodology for Data Schema Integration in the Entity Relationship Model, in: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 10 (6), 650-663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bhargava, H. K., Kimbrough, S. O.,and Krishnan, R.(1991) Unique Name Violations, a Problem for Model Integration or You Say Tomato, I Say Tomahto. ORSA Journal on Computing, 3 (2), 107-120.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keller, G., Nüttgens, M., and Scheer, A.-W.(1992). Semantische Prozeßmodellierung auf der Grundlage „Ereignisgesteuerter Prozeßketten (EPK)“, in: A.-W. Scheer (Hrsg.), Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Heft 89, Saarbrücken.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hars, A. (1994). Reference Data Models: Foundations of Efficient Data Modeling. [In German: Referenzdatenmodelle. Grundlagen effizienter Datenmodellierung]. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mendling, J.(2007). Detection and Prediction of Errors in EPC Business Process Models. Doctoral Thesis, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Becker, J., Rosemann, M., Schütte, R.(1995). Grundsätze ordnungsmäßiger Modellierung (GoM), Wirtschaftsinformatik, 37 (5), 435-445.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rosemann, M. (2003) Preparation of Process Modeling, In: Process Management – A Guide for the Design of Business Processes, Eds.: Becker, J., Kugeler, M., Rosemann, M., 41-78.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meise, V.(2001). Ordnungsrahmen zur prozessorientierten Organisationsgestaltung. Modelle für das Management komplexer Reorganisationsprojekte. Hamburg 2001.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Becker, J., and Schütte, R.(2004). Handelsinformationssysteme – Domänenorientierte Einführung in die Wirtschaftsinformatik. Frankfurt am Main 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Research Center for Information SystemsUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations