Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Induktion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Statistik im Forschungsprozess

Zusammenfassung

Ihr volle wissenschaftstheoretisch-philosophische Tiefe erhält die Statistik erst mit der Betrachtung des allgemeinen Induktionsproblems. Man kann sie sogar als den am weitesten ausgearbeiteten theoretisch fundierten als auch praktisch erfolgreichen Versuch auffassen, jenes zu lösen. Die Formulierung von Tukey deutet bereits an, dass die Statistik nicht eine, sondern ein ganzes Spektrum spezieller Lösungen anbietet. Genauso wenig wie es den Stein der Weisen gibt, existiert ein Induktionsprinzip. Vielmehr gibt es eine ganze Reihe von Ansätzen und verschiedenartige Klassen von Argumenten um Verallgemeinerungen zu rechtfertigen.

Statistics is a broad field, whether or not you define it as ‘The science, the art, the philosophy, and the techniques of making inferences from the particular to the general.’

(Tukey 1961: 144)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Albrecht, H. (2005). Kritik der reinen Norm. Klinische Forschung hilft vor allem Standardpatienten. DIE ZEIT Nr. 2/2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, D.G. (1985). Comparability of Randomised Groups. The Statistician 34, 125-136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, D.G. (1998). Covariate imbalance, adjustment for. In: Armitage, P.; and Colton, T. (Hrsg.) Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. Wiley, Chichester, 1000-1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, P.C. (2008). A Critical Appraisal of Propensity-Score Matching in the Medical Literature between 1996 and 2003. Statistics in Medicine 27, 2037-2049.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • The Australian Lung Foundation (2007). Website, Aufruf am 11. 01. 2008. Siehe www.copdx.org.au/guidelines/a_evidence_levels.asp

  • Bailey, R.A. (1982). Randomization, Constrained. In: Johnson, N. L,; and Kotz, S. (Hrsg.) Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences Wiley, New York. (Neuauflage 2006.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, G.A. (1949). Statistical Inference. (Mit Diskussion) J. of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B 11, 115-149.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, G.A. (1958). Thomas Bayes - A Biographical Note. Einführung zum Wiederabdruck von Bayes (1763) in Biometrika 45(3 & 4), 293-297.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, G.A. (1993). Diskussionsbeitrag zu Draper et al. (1993). J. Royal Stat. Soc. A 56(1), 31-32.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, G.A. (1996b). Fragments of a Statistical Autobiography. Student 1, 257-268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, V. (1999). Comparative Statistical Inference. (3. Aufl.) Wiley, New York. 1. Aufl. 1973.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, D. (1980). Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: the Fisher Randomization Test. J. of the American Statistical Association 75, 575-595.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bayarri, M.J. (1995). Diskussionsbeitrag zu Cox (1995). Test 4(2), 228-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayes, T. (1763). An Essay towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 53, 370-418. Wiederabgedruckt in Biometrika (1958) 45(3 & 4), 298-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J.H. (1990). Statistical Inference and Analysis. Selected Correspondence of R.A. Fisher. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beran, R. (2008). Kommentar zu Davies (2008). J. of the Korean Statistical Society 37, 217-219.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J.O. (1985). Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. (2. Aufl.) Springer, New York: Springer Series in Statistics. 1. Aufl. 1980.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, V. (2005a). Selection Bias and Covariate Imbalances in Randomized Clinical Trials. Wiley, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, V. (2005b). Quantifying the Magnitude of Baseline Covariate Imbalances Resulting from Selection Bias in Randomized Clinical Trials. (Mit Diskussion). Biometrical Journal 47(2), 119-139.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bernoulli, J. (1713). Ars Conjectandi. Thurnisiorum, Basel. Wiederabgedruckt in: Die Werke von Jacob Bernoulli, Band 3, Birkhaeuser, Basel (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, P.L. (1996). Against the Gods. The Remarkable Story of Risk. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthold, M.R.; and Hand, D.J. (Hrsg., 2003). Intelligent Data Analysis. (2. Aufl.) Springer, Berlin.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, A. (1962). On the Foundations of Statistical Inference. J. of the American Statistical Association 57, 269-306. Wiederabgedruckt in Kotz und Johnson (1993: Bd. I, 478-518).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C.M. (1995). Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. (Seitdem ständig nachgedruckt.) Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C.M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnstad, J.F. (1996). On the Generalization of the Likelihood Function and the Likelihood Principle. J. of the American Statistical Association 91, 791-806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodmer, W. (1987). Kommentar zu Durbin (1987), J. of the Royal Stat. Soc. A 150(3), 190-191.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Boole, G. (1854). An Investigation of the Laws of Thought. Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorstin, D.J. (1983). The Discoverers. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E.G. (1919). Mathematical vs. Scientific Significance. Psychological Bulletin 16(10), 335-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E.G. (1953). The Nature and History of Experimental Control. The American Journal of Psychology 67(4), 573-589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G.E.P. (1976). Science and Statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association 71, 791-799.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G.E.P. (1990a). Kommentar zu Roberts (1990). Statistical Science 5, 390-391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G.E.P.; Hunter, J.S.; and Hunter, W.G. (2005). Statistics for Experimenters. Design, Innovation, and Discovery. (2. Aufl.) Wiley, New York. 1. Aufl. 1978.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brillinger, D.R.; Fernholz, L.T.; and Morgenthaler, S. (Hrsg., 1997). The Practice of Data Analysis. Essays in Honor of John W. Tukey. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourbaki, N. (1950). The Architecture of Mathematics. American Mathematical Monthly 57, 221-232.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L. (2001). Statistical Modeling: The Two Culutures. Statistical Science 16(3), 199-231.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burgin, M. (2005). Super-Recursive Algorithms. Springer, New York: Monographs in Computer Science.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1962). Logical Foundations of Probability. (2. Aufl.) University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1963). Probability and Inductive Logic. In: Schilpp, P.A. (Hrsg.) The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. Cambridge University Press, London, 71-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1982). Einführung in die Philosophie der Naturwissenschaften. (2. Aufl.) Ullstein Materialien, Frankfurt a. M. und Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. (1999). The Dappled World. A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, A.F. (2006). Wege der Wissenschaft. Einführung in die Wissenschaftstheorie (6. Aufl.) Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield, C. (2002). Confessions of a Pragmatic Statistician. The Statistician 51(1), 1-20.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.; Härdle, W.; and Unwin, A. (Hrsg., 2008). Handbook of Data Visualization. Springer, Berlin: Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W.G. (1965). The Planning of Observational Studies of Human Populations. (Mit Diskussion) J. of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. A 128, 134-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. J. (1989). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Induction and Probability. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H. und Hedges, L.V. (Hrsg., 1994). The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormen, T.H.; Leiseron, C.E.; Rivest, R.R.; and Stein, C. (2009). Introduction to Algorithms. (3. Aufl.) The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 1. Aufl. 1990.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R. (1986). Some General Aspects of the Theory of Statistics. International Statistical Review 54(2), 117-126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R. (1990). Role of Models in Statistical Analysis. Statistical Science 5(2), 169-174.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R. (1995). The Relation between Theory and Application in Statistics. (Mit Diskussion) Test 4(2), 207-261.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R. (2000). Kommentar zu Lindley (2000). The Statistician 49(3), 321-324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R. (2001). Kommentar zu Breiman (2001). Statistical Science 16(3), 216-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R. (2006). Principles of Statistical Inference. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, E. (2005). Fuzzy Modeling and Genetic Algorithms for Data Mining and Exploration. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Amsterdam.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R.T. (1946). Probability, Frequency, and Reasonable Expectation. American J. of Physics 14, 1-13.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J.; Gleser, G.C.; Harinder Nanda, A.N.; and Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnbeck, H. (2009). Erderwärmung. Einfach-Modell soll kurzfristige Klimaprognose verbessern Spiegel Online, 5. 9. 2009. Siehe www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/natur/0,1518,646688,00.html

  • Davies, P.L. (2008). Approximating Data. (Mit Diskussion) J. of the Korean Statistical Society 37, 191-240.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dawid, A.P. (2003). Causal Inference using Influence Diagrams: the Problem of Partial Compliance. Kapitel 2 in Green et al. (2003), 45-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W.E. (1940). Discussion of Professor Hotelling’s Paper. Kommentar zu Hotelling (1940). Ann. of Math. Statistis 11, 470-471.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A.P. (1983). Purpose and Limitations of Data Analysis. In: Box, E.E. P.; Leonard, T.; and Wu, C.-F. (Hrsg.) Scientific Inference, Data Analysis, and Robustness. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A.P. (1990). Causality and Statistics. J. of Statistical Planning and Inference 25, 261-278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A.P. (1998). Logicist Statistics I. Models and Modeling. Statistical Science 13, 248-276.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Diaconis, P. (1998). A Place for Philosophy? The Rise of Modeling in Statistical Science. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 56(4), 797-806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaconis, P. (2006). Theories of Data Analysis: From Magical Thinking Through Classical Statistics. Kapitel 1 (S. 1-36) in: Hoaglin, D.C.; Mosteller, F.; and Tukey, J.W. (Hrsg., 2006). Exploring Data Tables, Trends, and Shapes. (2. Aufl.) Wiley, New York. 1. Aufl. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, J. (1973). Kommentar zu Dawid et al. (1973). J. of the Royal Stat. Soc., Ser. B 35, 219-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, D.; Hodges, J.S.; Mallows, C.L.; and Pregibon, D. (1993). Exchangeability and Data Analysis. J. Royal Stat. Soc. A 56(1), 9-37.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O.D. (1984). Notes on Social Measurement. Historical and Critical. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, F. (2008). John A. Wheeler, Physicist Who Coined the Term ‘Black Hole,’ Is Dead at 96. Nachruf in der New York Times, 14. April 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J. (1992). Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington, E.S. (1995). Randomization Tests. (3. Aufl.) Reihe: Statistics, Textbooks and Monographs 147. Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A.W.F. (1992). Likelihood. (2. Aufl.) Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD. 1. Aufl. 1972.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. Annals of Statistics 7, 1-26. Wiederabgedruckt in Kotz und Johnson (1993: Bd. II, 569-294).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (2001). Statistics is the Science of Information Gathering, Especially when the Information arrives in Little Pieces instead of Big Ones. Interview with Bradley Efron. Business Science Center, Irwin/McGraw-Hill Student Learning Aids.www.mhhe.com/business/opsci/bstat/efron.mhtml

  • Efron, B. (2005). Modern Science and the Bayesian-Frequentist Controversy. Technical Report No. 2005-19B/233. Dept. of Statistics, Stanford University. Siehe www-stat.stanford.edu/~ckirby/brad/…/2005NEWModernScience.pdf (Aufruf am 16. 09. 2009.)

  • Efron, B. (2006). Kommentar zu Mallows (2006). Technometrics 48(3), 330-332.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. (1993). Mein Weltbild. (25. Aufl.) Ullstein, Frankfurt a. M. 1. Aufl. 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiner, A. (2005). Einführung in das Induktionsproblem. Humes induktive Skepsis und moderne Antworten. Der Andere Verlag, Lübeck und Marburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J.H. (Hrsg., 2001). The Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel. Studies in Science, Explanation, and Rationality. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R.P. (2007). Vom Wesen physikalischer Gesetze (8. Aufl.) Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S.E. (1985). Comments on and Reactions to Freedman, Statistics and the Scientific Method. In: Mason und Fienberg (1985), 371-384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, T.L. (1973). Theories of Probability - an Examination of Foundations. Academic Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Finetti, B. de (2006). L’invenzione della verità. Cortina, Mailand. Zuvor unveröffentlichtes Manuskript aus dem Jahr 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K. (1995). Braucht die Wissenschaft eine Theorie? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 26, 227-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K. (2004). Spielräume wissenschaftlichen Handelns - Die Grauzone der Wissenschaftspraxis. In: Freiheit und Verantwortung in Forschung, Lehre und Studium. Die ethische Dimension der Wissenschaft. 34. Bildungspolitischen Forum, 27. Februar 2004 in Berlin, 41-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. (1922). On the Mathematical Foundations of Theoratical Statistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Ser. A 222, 309-368. Zitiert nach Kotz und Johnson (1993: Bd. I, 11-44).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. (1955). Statistical Methods and Scientific Induction. J. of the Royal Stat. Soc., Ser. B 17(1), 69-78.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. (1966). The Design of Experiments. (8. Aufl.) Hafner Publishing Company, New York. 1. Aufl. 1935, 4. Aufl. 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. (1970). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. (14. Aufl.) Macmillan, New York. 1. Aufl. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. (1973). Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference. (3. Aufl.) Hafner Publishing Company, New York. 1. Aufl. 1956, 2. Aufl. 1959.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fitelson, B. (2005). Inductive Logic. In: Pfeifer, J.; and Sarkar, S. (Hrsg.) The Philosophy of Science. An Encyclopedia. Routledge, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraassen, B. van (1990). Laws and Symmetry. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D.A. (1981). Some Pitfalls in Large Econometic Models. J. of Business 54, 479-500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D.A. (1985a). Statistics and the Scientific Method. Mason und Fienberg (1985), 343-366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D.A. (1985b). A Rejoinder of Fienberg’s Comments. Mason und Fienberg (1985), 385-390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D.A. (1987a). As Others See Us: A Case Study in Path Analysis. J. of Educational Statistics 12(2), 101-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D.A. (1987b). A Rejoinder on Models, Metaphors, and Fables. J. of Educational Statistics 12(2), 206-223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D.A. (1991). Statistical Models and Shoe Leather. Sociological Methodology 21, 291-313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D.A. (1997). From Association to Causation via Regression. Adv. Appl. Math. 18, 59-110.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D.A. (2005). Statistical Models: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D.A. (2008a). Randomization does not Justify Logistic Regression. Statistical Science 23 (2008), 237-249.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D.A. (2008b). On Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data. Advances in Applied Mathematics 40, 180-193.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D.A. (2010). Statistical Models and Causal Inference. A Dialogue with the Social Sciences. Posthum herausgegeben und mit einer Einleitung (S. i-xvi) versehen von Collier, D.; Sekhon, J.S.; and Stark, P.B. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J.H. (1997). Data Mining and Statistics: What’s the Connection? Keynote Address at the 29th Symposium on the Interface of Computing Science and Statistics. Siehe http://amscampus.cib.unibo.it/archive/00001163/ und http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~jhf/

  • Friedman, J.H. (2001). The Role of Statistics in the Data Revolution? International Statistical Review 69(1), 5-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1953). Essays in Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M. (2001). A Skeptical Look at Karl Popper. Skeptical Inquirer, 25(4), 13-14, 72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A; Carlin, J.B.; Stern, H.S.; and Rubin, D.B. (2004). Bayesian Data Analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (1993). From Metaphysics to Psychophysics and Statistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16(1), 139-140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G.; Gaissmaier, W.; Kurz-Milcke, E.; Schwartz, L.M. und Woloshin, S. (2008). Helping Doctors and Patients make Sense of Health Statistics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 8(2), 53-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G.; Krauss, S. und Vitouch, O. (2004). The Null Ritual. What You Always Wanted to Know About Significance Testing but Were Afraid to Ask. Kapitel 21 in Kaplan (2004), 391-408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, D. (2009). On Bruno de Finetti’s L’invenzione de la verità. In: Galavotti (2009), 249-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C. (1983). Social Science and Social Physics. Behavioral Science 28(2), 126-134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C.; Madigan, D.; Pregibon, D.; and Smyth, P. (1996). Statistical Inference and Data Mining. Communications of the ACM 39(11), 35-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C.; Madigan, D.; Pregibon, D.; and Smyth, P. (1997). Statistical Lessons for Data Mining. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 1, 11-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C.; Scheines, R.; Spirtes, P.; and Kelly, K. (1987). Discovering Causal Structure. Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy of Science, and Statistical Modeling. Academic Press, San Diego.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Good, I.J. (1967). The White Shoe is a Red Herring. Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 17, 322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, I.J. (1983b). The Philosophy of Explanatory Data Analysis. Philosophy of science 50, 283-295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, I.J. (1988). The Interface between Statistics and Philosophy of Science. (Mit Diskussion) Statistical science 3(4), 386-412.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Good, P.I. (2000). Permutation Tests. (2. Aufl.) Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, P.I. (2001). Resampling Methods: a Practical Guide to Data Analysis. (2. Aufl.) Birkhauser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1990). Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. (4. Aufl.) Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA. Erstausgabe 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S.N. (1999a). Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 1: The p Value Fallacy. Annals Intern Med. 130, 995-1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S.N. (1999b). Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 2: The Bayes Factor. Annals Intern Med. 130, 1005-1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosset, W. S.; Pseudonym “Student” (1908). The Probable Error of a Mean. Biometrika 6(1), 1-25. Wiederabgedruckt in Kotz und Johnson (1993: Bd. II, 33-58).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gøtzsche, P.C.; Kassirer, J.P.; Woolley, K.L., Wager, E., Jacobs, A.; Gertel, A.; and Hamilton, C. (2009). What Should Be Done To Tackle Ghostwriting in the Medical Literature?. PLoS Med 6(2): e1000023. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000023

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, S. (1990). Randomization, Statistics, and Causal Inference. Epidemiology 1(6), 421-429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, S. (1998a). Probability Logic and Probabilistic Induction. Epidemiology 9(3),322-332.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, S. (1998b). Induction versus Popper: Substance versus Semantics. Internatin J. of Epidemiology 27, 543-548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grünwald, P.D. (2007). The Minimum Description Length Principle. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1985). The Illogic of Statistical Inference for Cumulative Science. Applied stochastic models and data analysis 1, 3-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1988). Telepathy: Origins of Randomization in Experimental Design. ISIS 79, 427-451.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (2001). An Introduction to Probabilty Theory and Inductive Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampel, F.R.; Rousseeuw; P.J.; Ronchetti, E.M.; and Stahel, W.A. (1986). Robust Statistics. The Approach Based on Influence Functions. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hand, D.J. (1998b). Data Mining: Statistics and More? The American Statistician 52(2), 112-118.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hand, D.J. (1999). Why Data Mining is more than Statistics Writ Large. Bulletin of the ISI 99, 433-436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, D.J. (2007). Information Generation. How Data Rule our World. Oneworld Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, D.J.; and Vinciotti, V. (2003). Local versus Global Models for Classification Problems: Fitting Models where it Matters. The American Statistician 57(2), 124-131.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan, J.A. (1993). Kommentar zu Draper et al. (1993). J. Royal Stat. Soc. A 56(1), 34-35.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne, J. (2005), Inductive Logic. In: Zalta, E.N. (Hrsg.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.G. (1945). Studies in the Logic of Confirmation. Mind 54, 1-26.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation (and other essays). Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuser, H. (1989). Gewöhnliche Differentialgleichungen. Teubner Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, D. (1944). Unbekannte Briefe Frege’s über die Grundlagen der Geometrie und Antwortbrief Hilbert’s an Frege. In: Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch- Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, 2. Abhandlung Kommissionsverlag der Weiß’schen Universitätsbuchhandlung Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Jahrgänge 1941-1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, J.S. (1996). Statistical Practice as Argumentation: A Sketch of a Theory of Applied Statistics. In: Lee, J.C.; Johnson, W.O.; und Zellner, A. (Hrsg.) Modeling and Prediction. Essays in Honor of Seymour Geisser. Springer, New York, 19-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn, T.; Hornik, K.; van de Wiel, M.A.; and Zeileis, A. (2006). A Lego System for Conditional Inference. The American Statistician 60(3), 257-263.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Howson, C. (2008). De Finetti, Countable Additivity, Consistency and Coherence. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59, 1-23.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Howson, C. (2009). Logic and Finite Additivity: Mutual Supporters in Bruno de Finetti’s Probability Theory. In: Galavotti (2009), 41-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubble, E.P. (1929). A Relation between Distance and Radial Velocity among Extra- Galactic Nebulae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 15, 168–173.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P.J. (1997) Speculations on the Path of Statistics. In: Brillinger et al. (1997), 175- 191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P.J. (2006). Kommentar zu Mallows (2006). Technometrics 48(3), 332-334.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hudec, M. (o. J.). Data Mining - Ein neues Paradigma der angewandten Statistik. Manuskript, Universität Wien. Siehe www.statistik.tuwien.ac.at/oezstat/ausg021/papers/hudec.doc (Aufruf am 14. 12. 2008).

  • Hutter, M. (2007). On Universal Prediction and Bayesian Confirmation. Theoretical Computer Science, 384, 33-48.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Inman, H.F. (1994). Karl Pearson and R. A. Fisher on Statistical Tests: A 1935 Exchange from Nature. The American Statistician, 48(1), 2-11.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidian, M. (2004). Strategies for Analysis of Incomplete Data. Kapitel 5 in Hardy and Bryman (2004), 113-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes, E.T. (1957). Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics I, II. Physical Review, 106, 620-630 und 108, 171-190.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes, E.T. (1968). Prior Probabilities. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, SSC-4, 227-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes, E.T. (2003). Probability Theory. The Logic of Science. Posthum herausgegeben von Bretthorst, G. L. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, H. (1946). An Invariant form for the Prior Probability in Estimation Problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Ser. A 186, 453-461.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, H. (1955). The Present Position in Probability Theory. Brit. J. of Philosophy of Science V, 257-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, H. (1973). Scientific Inference. (3. Aufl.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, H. (1980). Some General Points in Probability Theory. Kapitel 29 in: Zellner, A. und Kadane, J.B. (Hrsg.) Bayesian Analysis in Econometrics and Statistics. Essays in Honor of Harold Jeffreys. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam: Studies in Bayesian Econometrics, Bd. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, D.J. (1987a). Tests of Significance Following R. A. Fisher. Brit J. Phil. Sci. 38, 481-499.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L.V. (Hrsg., 1986). The collected works of J. W. Tukey, Bd. IV: “Philosophy and Principles of Data Analysis: 1965-1986.” Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judson, H.F. (2004). The Great Betrayal. Fraud in Science. Harcourt, Inc., Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempthorne, O. (1971). Probability Theory, Statistics and the Knowledge Business. In: Godambe and Sprott (1971), 471-499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempthorne, O. (1980). Kommentar zu Basu (1980). J. of the American Statistical Association 75, 584-587.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kempthorne, O. (1992). Intervention Experiments, Randomization and Inference. In: Ghosh und Pathak (1992), 13-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, A.W. (1957). Errors of the Third Kind in Statistical Consulting. Journal of the American Statistical Association 52, 133-142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kish, L. (1987). Statistical Design for Research Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. Wiederabgedruckt in der Wiley Classic Library, Edition 2004.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kladroba, A. (2001). Was ist neu am Data Mining? - Einige Anmerkungen zur ‚neuen‘ Datenanalyse aus Sicht der Statistik. Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv 85, 455-462.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Klärner, H. (2003). Der Schluß auf die beste Erklärung. De Gruyter, Berlin: Ideen & Argumente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuth, D.E. (1999). The Art of Computer Programming. Bd. 1: Fundamental Algorithms, Bd. 2: Seminumerical Algorithms, Bd. 3: Sorting and Searching. (Gebundene Ausgabe) Addison-Wesley Longman, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauth, J. (2000). Experimental Design. A Handbook and Dictionary for Medical and Behavioral Research. Huston, J.P. (Hrsg.) Elsevier, Amsterdam: Techniques in the Behavioral and Neural Sciences, Bd. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krengel, U. (1988). Einführung in die Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Statistik. vieweg, Braunschweig.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, W.H. (1958). Ordinal Measures of Association. Journal of the American Statistical Association 53, 814-861.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, W.H. (1988). Miracles and Statistics: The Casual Assumption of Independence. Journal of the American Statistical Association 83, 929-940.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg, H.E. (1961). Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lad, F. (1996). Operational Subjective Statistical Methods. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Laplace, P.-S. (1812). Théorie Analytique des Probabilités. Courcier Imprimeur, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, R.B. (2007). Abschied von der Weltformel. Piper, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecam, L. (1977). A Note on Metastatistics or ‘an Essay toward Stating a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances.’ Synthese 36, 133-160.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lecam, L. (1988). Discussion by Professor Lucien LeCam. In: Berger und Wolpert (1988), 182-185.2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.L.; McNeer, J.F.; Starmer, C.F.; Harris, P.J.; and Rosati, R.A. (1980). Clinical Judgement and Statistics. Lessons from a Simulated Randomized Trial in Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation 61, 508-515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E.L. (1990). Model Specification: The Views of Fisher and Neyman, and later Developments. Statistical Science 5(2), 160-168.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, H.J. (1994) Kommentar zu Hand (1994). Deconstructing Statistical Questions. J. of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. A 157, 341-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D.V. (1982a). Scoring Rules and the Inevitability of Probability. International Statistical Review 50, 1-26.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D.V. (1982b). The Role of Randomization in Inference. In: Asquith,P.D.; and Nickles, T. (Hrsg.) PSA 1982. Proceedings of the 1982 biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association, Bd. 2 „Symposia“. Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, 431-446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D.V. (2002). Letter to the Editor. Teaching Statistics 24(1), 22-23.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, J.K. (1999). Some Statistical Heresies. The Statistician 48(1), 1-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippe, P. von der (1996). Wirtschaftsstatistik. (5. Aufl.) UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the Best Explanation. (2. Aufl.) Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1690). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. T. Basset & E. Mory, London. Google Print erschließt die 13. Aufl. von 1849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F.M. (1953). On the Statistical Treatment of Football Numbers. The American Psychologist 8, 750-751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, D.H. (2003). Der rasende Kosmos - Dunkle Energie, die mysteriöse Supermacht im All. [Das Zitat im Text stammt von B. Leibundgut.] Welt der Physik. Siehe www.weltderphysik.de/de/1106.php. (Letzte Aktualisierung 4.11.2003; Aufruf am 5. 6. 2008.)

  • MacKay, D.J.C. (2005) Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. (Version 7.2 vom 28.05.2005, 4th printing) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallows, C.L. (2006). Tukey’s Paper after 40 Years. (Mit Diskussion) Technometrics 48(3), 319-336.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C.F. (2008). Identification for Prediction and Decision. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrow, A.J. (2002). Kurt Lewin. Leben und Werk. Beltz Verlag, Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. (1984). Munchausen’s Statistical Grid, which makes all Trials Significant. The Lancet 324, 1457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J.C. (1850). Letter to Lewis Campbell. Abgedruckt in: Campbell, L., und Garrett, W. (1881). The Life of James Clerk Maxwell. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, G. (1989). The Scientist’s View of Statistics - a Neglected Area. J. of the Royal Stat. Society 152, 221-240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P.E. (1990). Apraising and Amending Theories: The Strategy of Lakatosian Defence and Two Principles that Warrant it. Psychological Inquiry 1(2), 108-141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menges, G. (1982). Die Statistik. Zwölf Stationen des statistischen Arbeitens. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. (1843). A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. London. Zitiert nach der Ausgabe von Harper & Brothers, New York, 1859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2006). Out Of Error: Further Essays On Critical Rationalism. Ashgate Publishing, Hants, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (1989). More Heat than Light. Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature’s Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mises, R. von (1919). Wahrscheinlichkeit, Statistik und Wahrheit. (4. Aufl. 1972) Springer, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, A. de (1838). An Essay on Probabilites, and on Their Application to Life Contingencies and Insurance Offices. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, A. (1981). Unreal Assumptions in Economic Theory: The F Twist Untwisted. Kyklos 34(3), 377-387.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1982). Teleology Revisited and Other Essays in the Philosophy and History of Science. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelder, J.A. (1999). Statistics for the Millenium. (Mit Diskussion.) The Statistician 48(2), 257-269.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, J. (1955). The Problem of Inductive Inference. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics VIII, 13-46.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, M. (1986). Statistical Inference: A Commentary for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osherson, D.N., Smith, E.E., Wilkie, O., Lopez, A.; and Shafir, E. (1990). Category-Based Induction. Psychological Review 97, 185-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascal, B. (2000). Oeuvres complètes (2 Bde.) Gallimard, Paris: Bibliothèques de la Pléiade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (2009a). Causality. Models, Reasoning and Inference. (2. Aufl.) Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. (1892). The Grammar of Science. Walter Scott, London. Revidierte Auflagen 1900 und 1911.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. (1935). Statistical Tests. Letter to Nature 136, 550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K.; Lee, A.; and Bramley-Moore, L. (1899). Genetic (Reproductive) Selection: Inheritance of Fertility in Man. Phil. Trans. fo the Royal Society, Ser. A 73, 534-539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. (1878). The Probability of Induction. Popular Science Montly. Wiederabgedruckt in: Newman, J.R. (Hrsg., 1956) The World of Mathematics 2. Simon and Schuster, New York, 1341-1354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersohn, H. (2005). Data Mining. Verfahren, Prozesse, Anwendungsarchitektur. Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quenouille, M.H. (1949). Approximate Tests of Correlation in Time Series. J. of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 11, 18-44.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.P. (1926). Truth and Probability. In: Ramsey (1931), The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays, ch. VII (S. 156-198), hrsg. von Braithwaithe, R.B. Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1947). Rationalismus und Empirismus: Eine Untersuchung der Wurzeln philosophischen Irrtums. Vortrag, gehalten am 30. Dezember 1947. Zitiert nach: Kamalah und Reichenbach (1977), 451-465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1949). The Theory of Probability. An Inquiry into the Logical and Mathematical Foundations of the Calculus of Probabilities. (2. Aufl.) University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1968). Der Aufstieg der wissenschaftlichen Philosophie. (2. Aufl.) Vieweg, Braunschweig. 1. deutsche Aufl. 1953. Zitiert nach: Kamalah und Reichenbach (1977), 85-450. (In der 2. deutschen Auflage entspricht dies den Seiten 5-370.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissanen, J. (1989). Stochastic Complexity in Statistical Inquiry. World Scientific, Singapore: Series in Computer Science 15.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rissanen, J. (2007). Information and Complexity in Statistical Modelling. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P.R. (2002). Observational Studies. (2. Aufl.) Springer, New York: Springer Series in Statistics. 1. Aufl. 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1966). Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research. Appleton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1981). Pavlov’sMice, Pfungst’s Horse, and Pygmalion’s PONS: some Models for the Study of Interpersonal Expectancy Effects. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 364, 182-198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, K.J. (Hrsg., 1988). Causal Inference. Epidemiology Resources Inc., Chestnut Hill, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, K.J.; Greenland, S.; and Lash, T.L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology. (3. Aufl.) Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royall, R.M. (1997). Statistical Evidence. A Likelihood Paradigm. Chapman & Hall, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D.B. (1978). Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization. Annals of Statistics 6, 34-58.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D.B. (2004). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Nachdruck in der Wiley Classics Library, New York. 1. Aufl. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruelle, D. (1992). Zufall und Chaos. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1903). Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Mont, U. (2000). Kontexte als Modelle der Welt. Subjektive Erkenntnis- und Wissenschaftstheorie. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin: Erfahrung und Denken, Bd. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Mont, U. (2010). Randomization Does not Help Much. Eingereicht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W.C. (1989). Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A. (1963). Comments on Ernest Nagel’s ‘Assumptions in Economic Theory’. American Economic Review (May). Wiederabgedruckt in: Stiglitz, J. E. (Hrsg., 1966). The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 2(129), 1772-1778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satelli, A.; Tarantola, S.; Campolongo, F.; and Ratto, M. (2004). Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models. Wiley, Hoboken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.J.H. (1961). The Subjective Basis of Statistical Practice. Technical Report, Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.J.H. (1972). The Foundations of Statistics. (2. Aufl.) Dover, New York. 1. Aufl. 1954.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Scheines, R.; Spirtes, P.; Glymour, C.; Meek, C.; and Richardson, T. (1998). The TETRAD Project: Constraint Based Aids to Causal Model Specification und Reply to Comments. Multivariate Behavioral Research 33(1), 65-117 und 165-180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlick, M. (1979). Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M. Wiederabdruck der 2. Aufl., erschienen im Verlag J. Springer, Berlin (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlick, M. (1986). Die Probleme der Philosophie in ihrem Zusammenhang. Vorlesung aus dem Wintersemester 1933/34. (Mulder, H.; Kox, A.J. und Hegelsmann, R., Hrsg.) Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, G. (2007).Wissenschaftliche Erklärungen. Kapitel 3 in Bartels und Stöckler (2007), 69-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenfeld, T. (1986). Entropy and Uncertainty. Philosophy of Science 53, 467-491.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sellke, T.; Bayarri, M.J.; and Berger, J.O. (2001). Calibration of P-values for Testing Precise Null Hypotheses. The American Statistician 55, 62-71.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Senn, S. (1994). Fisher’s Game with the Devil. Statistics in Medicine 13, 217-230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senn, S. (2000). Consensus and Controversy in Pharmaceutical Statistics. (Mit Diskussion) The Statistician 49(2), 135-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senn, S. (2003). Bayesian, Likelihood, and Frequentist Approaches to Statistics. A Comparison of Methods. Applied Clinical Trials 12(8), 35-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379-423 und 623-656.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. (1997). Philosophy of Mathematics. Structure and Ontology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, E.H. (1951). The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables. J. of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B 13, 238-241.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (2003). Medical Journals and Pharmaceutical Companies: Uneasy Bedfellows. British Medical Journal 326, 1202–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (2005). Medical Journals are an Extension of the Marketing Arm of Pharmaceutical Companies. PLoS Med 2(5), e138. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70(1), 65-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soofi, E.S. (2000). Principal Information Theoretic Approaches. J. of the American Statistical Association 95, 1349-1353.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Spirtes, P.; Glymour, C.; and Scheines, R. (2000). Causation, Prediction, and Search. (2. Aufl.) The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalker, D. (1992). Grue!: The New Riddle of Induction. Open Court, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steingart, G. (2008). Vorwahlkampf. Der Selbstverrat der US-Medien. Spiegel Online, 13. 5. 2008. Siehe www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,552874,00.html

  • Stevens, S.S. (1968). Measurement, Statistics, and the Schemapiric View. Science 161, 849-856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, S.M. (1986). The History of Statistics. The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, S.M. (1999). Statistics on the Table. The History of Statistical Concepts and Methods. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stove, D. (2000). Scientific Irrationalism. Origins of a Postmodern Cult. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick. Zunächst publiziert unter dem Titel “Anything Goes: Origins of the Cult of Scientific Irrationalism”, Macleay Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (2009). Some Philosophical Reflections on de Finetti’s Thought. In: Galavotti (2009), 19-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taves, D.R. (1974). Minimization: A new Method of Assigning Patients to Treatment and Control Groups. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 15(5), 443-453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titz, S. (2005). Wie wird der nächste Sommer? Spektrum der Wissenschaft 8, 48-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todhunter, I. (1865). A History of the Mathematical Theory of Probability from the Time of Pascal to that of Laplace. Cambridge Univ. Press. Wiederabgedruckt: Chelsea, 1949 und 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonelli, M.R. (1998). The Philosophical Limits of Evidence-based Medicine. Academic Medicine 73(12), 1234-1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J.W. (1958). Bias and Confidence in not-quite large Samples. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 29, 614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J.W. (1960a).Where do we go from here? J. of the American Statistical Association 52, 80-91. Zitiert nach Kapitel 5 (S. 107-126) in Jones (1986a).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J.W. (1961). Statistical and Quantitative Methodology. In: Trends in Social Science. Ray, D.P. (Hrsg.) Philosophical Library, Inc., New York, 84-136. Zitiert nach Kapitel 7 (S. 143-181) in Jones (1986a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J.W. (1969). Analyzing Data: Sanctification or Detective Work? American Psychologist 24, 83-91. Zitiert nach Kapitel 16 (S. 721-740) in Jones (1986b).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J.W. (1972). Data Analysis, Computation and Mathematics. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 30, 51-65. Zitiert nach Kapitel 18 (S. 754-775) in Jones (1986b).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J.W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley: Behavioral Science; Quantitative Methods.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J.W. (1980a). We need both Exploratory and Confirmatory. The American Statistician 34, 23-25. Zitiert nach Kapitel 22 (S. 811-817) in Jones (1986b).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J.W. (1980b). Methodological Comments focused on Opportunities. In: Monge, P.R.; and Cappella, J. (Hrsg.) Multivariate Techniques in Communication Research. Academic Press, New York, 489-528. Zitiert nach Kapitel 23 (S. 819-867) in Jones (1986b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J.W. (1984). Data Analysis: History and Prospects. In: David, H. A.; and David, H.T. (Hrsg.) Statistics: An Appraisal. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA. Zitiert nach Kapitel 29 (S. 985-1001) in Jones (1986b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J.W. (1986a). Foreword to the Philosophy Volumes. In: Jones (1986a) und Jones (1986b), xxxix-xliv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J.W. (1986b). Data Analysis and Behavioral Science or Learning to Bear the Quantitative Man’s Burden by Shunning Badmandments. Kapitel 8 (S. 187-390) in Jones (1986a). Zuvor unveröffentlichtes Manuskript aus dem Jahr 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J.W. (1986d). Comment. Kapitel 21 (S. 805-809) in Jones (1986b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J.W. (1986f). Sunset Salvo. The American Statistician 40, 72-76 (ebenfalls 1986). Zitiert nach Kapitel 30 (S. 1003-1016) in Jones (1986b).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J.W. (1997). More Honest Foundations for Data Analysis. J. of Statistical Planning and Inference 57, 21-28.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Unwin, A; Theus, M.; and Hofmann, H. (2006). Graphics of Large Data Sets. Visualizing a Million. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbach, P. (1985). Randomization and the Design of Experiments. Philosophy of Science 52, 256-273.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteelandt, S.; Goetghebeur, E.; Kenward, M.G.; and Mohlenberghs, G. (2006). Ignorance and Uncertainty Regions as Inferential Tools in a Sensitivity Analysis. Statistica Sinica 16, 953-979.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Velleman, P.F. (1997). The Philosophical Past and the Digital Future of Data Analysis: 375 years of Philosophical Guidance for Software Design on the Occasion of John W. Tukey’s 80th Birthday. In: Brillinger et al. (1997), 317-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn, J. (1888). The Logic of Chance. (3. Aufl.) Macmillan, London. 1. Aufl. 1866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verein Ernst Mach (Hrsg., 1929). Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung. Der Wiener Kreis. Artur Wolf Verlag, Wien. Zitiert nach: Stöltzner und Uebel (2006: Abschnitt 1.1), 3-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, G. (2003). Was können wir wissen? Band 1. Die Natur der Erkenntnis. Beiträge zur Evolutionären Erkenntnistheorie. (3. Aufl.) Hirzel, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, C.S. (2005). Statistical and Inductive Inference by Minimum Message Length. Springer, New York. Serie: Information Science and Statistics.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. (1993). Sense and Nonsense of Statistical Inference. Controversy, Misuse and Subtlety. Marcel Dekker, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, S. (1998). The Revolution That Didn’t Happen. New York Review of Books XLV, No. 15. Siehe www.cs.utexas.edu/users/vl/notes/weinberg.html

  • Wheeler, G. (2007). A Review of the Lottery Paradox. In: Harper und Wheeler (2007), 1-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigner, E. (1960). The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences. Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 13(1), 1-14.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia (2009). Stichwort “Imprecise Probability”, Version vom 27. 3. 2009. Siehe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imprecise_probability

  • Wilkinson, L. and Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999). Statistical Methods in Psychology Journals: Guidelines and Explanations. American Psychologist 54(8), 594-604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woit, P. (2006). Not Even Wrong. The Failure of String Theory and the Continuing Challenge to Unify the Laws of Physics. Vintage Books (Bertelsmann media worldwide).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G.A. (1994). Bootstrap: More than a Stab in the Dark? (Mit Diskussion) Statistical Science 9(3), 382-415.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, M. (1995). Wahrheit und Wissen in der Mathematik. Das Benacerrafsche Dilemma. transparent verlag H. & E. Preuß, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fachhochschule Nordhausen Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Weinberghof 4, 99734, Nordhausen, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Uwe Saint-Mont

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Uwe Saint-Mont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uwe Saint-Mont .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saint-Mont, U. (2011). Induktion. In: Statistik im Forschungsprozess. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2723-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation