Agent-Based Modeling of Householders’ Migration Behavior and Its Consequences

  • Itzhak Benenson
  • Itzhak Orner
  • Erez Hatna
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)


The Agent-Based approach is the most promising among the modelling techniques developed in recent decades that apply to demography and the social sciences. The current paper considers this approach with respect to householder migration and dynamics of residential distribution. It begins with a characterization of different styles of AB modelling and proceeds with examples of AB models of residential behavior, ranging from Schelling-type abstract models to real-world simulations of the population dynamics of an urban region with a population of 30,000. The latter is investigated in depth.


Migration Behavior Architectural Style Residential Distribution Householder Migration Householder Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Adami, Ch. (1998): Introduction to Artificial Life. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anselin, L. (1995): Local Indicators of Spatial Association — LISA. Geographical Analysis 27 (2), 93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benenson, I. (1998): Multi-agent simulations of residential dynamics in the city. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 22, 25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benenson, I. (1999): Modeling Population Dynamics in the City: from a Regional to a Multi-Agent Approach. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 3, 149–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benenson, I., Omer, I., Hatna, E. (2002): Entity-Based Modeling of Urban Residential Dynamics — The Case of Yaffo, Tel-Aviv. Environmenl and Planning B, 29(4), 491–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brooks, R.A. (1994): Intelligence without reason. In: Steel, L., Brooks, R. (Eds.): The artificial life root to artificial intelligence, Building embodied, situated agents. pp 25–81, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown, L.A., Moore, E.G. (1970): The Intra-urban Migration Process: A perspective. Geografiska Annaler 52B, 1–13Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bura, S., Guerin-Pace, E, Mathian, H., Pumain, D., Sanders, L. (1996): Multiagent systems and the dynamics of a settlement system. Geographical Analysis 28, 161–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dendrinos, D., Sonis, M. (1990): Chaos and Socio-Spatial Dynamics. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Epstein, J.M., Axtell, R. (1996): Growing Artificial Societies. Brookings Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fokkema, T., Van Wissen, L. (1997): Moving plans of the elderly: A test of the stress-threshold model. Environment and Planning A 29(2), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gigerenzer, G., Goldstein, D.G. (1996): Reasoning the Fast and Frugal Way: Models of Bounded Rationality. Psychological Review 103 (4), 650–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gilbert, N.S., Troitzsch, K.G. (1999): Simulation for the Social Scientist. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Golledge, R.G., Timmermans, H. (1990): Applications of Behavioral Research on Spatial Problems I — Cognition. Progress in Human Geography 14(1), 57–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Halls, P.J., Bulling, M., White, P.C.L., Garland, L., Harris, S. (2001): Dirichlet neighbors: revisiting Dirichlet tessellation for neighborhood analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 25, 105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hegsclmann, R., Flache, A. (1999): Understanding complex social dynamics: a plea for cellular automata based modelling. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 1(3), Scholar
  17. Herrin, W.E., Kern, C.R. (1992): Testing the Standard Urban Model of Residential Choice — an Implicit Markets Approach. Journal of Urban Economics 31(2), 145–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    ICBS (Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics) (2000): Socio-Economic Characteristics of Population and Households in Localities and Statistical Areas. Pub. No 8 in the 1995 Census of Population and Housing series, State of Israel, Central Bureau of Statistics Publications, JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    May, R., Oster, A. (1976): Bifurcation and Dynamic Complexity in Simple Ecological Models. The American Naturalist 110, pp. 573–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Omer, I. (1996): Ethnic Residential Segregation as a Structuration Process. (in Hebrew) Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-AvivGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Omer, I. (1999): Ethnic Residential Segregation and Demographic Processes, Discrete Dynamics. Nature and Society 3 (2–3), 171–184Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Phipps, A.G., Carter, J.E. (1984): An individual-level analysis of the stress-resistance model of household mobility. Geographical Analysis 16(1), 176–189Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Plane, A.P., Rogerson, P.A. (1994): The Geographical Analysis of Population. Wiley&Sons, pp. 417Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Portugali, J. (1991): An Arab Segregated Neighborhood in Tel-Aviv: The Case of Adjami. Geography Research Forum 11, 37–50Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Portugali, J. (2000): Self-Organization and the City. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Portugali, J., Benenson, I. (1995): Artificial planning experience my means of a heuristic sell-space model: simulating international migration in the urban process. Environment and Planning A 27, 1647–1665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Portugali, J., Benenson, I. (1997): Human agent s between local and global forces in a self-organizing city. In: Schweitzer, F. (Ed.): Self-organization of complex structures: from individual to collective dynamics. Gordon and Breach, London, pp. 537–546Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Portugali, J., Benenson, I., Omer, I. (1994): Socio-spatial Residential Dynamics: Stability and Instability within a Self-Organized City. Geographical Analysis 26 (4), 321–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Portugali, J., Benenson, I., Orner, I. (1997): Spatial cognitive dissonance and socio spatial emergence in a self-organizing city. Environment and Planning B 24, 263–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Preston, S.H., Heuveline, P., Guillot, M. (2001): Demography. Measuring and Modeling Population Processes. Blackwell, London.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sakoda, J.M. (1971): The checkerboard model of social interaction. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1, 119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sanders, L., Pumain, D., Mathian, H., Guerin-Pace, F., Bura, S. (1997): SIMPOP: a multiagent system for the study of urbanism. Environment and Planning B 24, 287–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schelling, T. (1971): Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1, 143–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schelling, T. (1974): On the ecology of micro-motives. In: Marris, R. (Ed.): The Corporate Society. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schelling, T. (1984): Choice and consequence. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schnell, I., Benjamini, Y. (2001): The Socio-Spatial Isolation of Agents in Everyday Life: Spaces as an Aspect of Segregation. Annals of American Geographers 91(4), 622–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schumacher, M. (2001): Objective Coordination in Multi-Agent System Engineering: Design and Implementation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Simon, H.A. (1982): Models of bounded rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Speare, A. (1974): Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility. Demography 11, 173–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Timmermans, H., Golledge, R.G. (1990): Applications of Behavioral-Research on Spatial Problems — 2. Preference and Choice. Progress in Human Geography 14(3), 311–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Torrens, P.M. (2001): A hybrid geocornputation model for operational land-use and transport simulation. 97th Annual Meeting of AAG, NY,
  42. 42.
    Tu, Y., Goldfinch, J. (1996): A two-stage housing choice forecasting model. Urban Studies 33(3), 517–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Van Dyke Parunak, H., Savit, R., Riolo, R. L. (1998): Agent-Based Modeling vs Equation-Based Modeling: a case study and user’s guide. pp. 10–26 In: Sichman, J.S., Conte, R., Gilbert, N. (Eds.): Multi-Agent systems and Agent-Based Simulation, Springer, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1534Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Weidlich, W. (2000): Sociodynamics: A Systematic Approach to Mathematical Modeling in the Social Science. HarwoodGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wilson, W.G. (1998): Resolving discrepancies between Deterministic Population models and Individual-Based simulations. American Naturalist 151 (2), 116–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wolpert, J. (1965): Behavioral Aspects of the Decision to Migrate. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association 15, 159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N. R. (1995): Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages; a Survey. In: Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R. (Eds.): Intelligent Agents, LNAI, No 890, pp. 1–39, Springer VerlagGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Itzhak Benenson
    • 1
  • Itzhak Orner
    • 1
  • Erez Hatna
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geography and Human EnvironmentTel Aviv UniversityTel-AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations