Skip to main content

Introduction: Agent-Based Computational Demography

  • Chapter
Agent-Based Computational Demography

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

Abstract

Originating from developments in computer science (also applied to natural sciences), a computational approach to the study of human behavior has developed that has gathered impetus in the literature during the 1990s. Agent-based computational models have become more and more used in the social sciences (i.e. in economics with the idea of Agent-based Computational Economics (ACE), and in sociology with the idea of Social Simulation). Different to the approach based on statistical analysis of behavioral data that aims to understand why specific rules are applied by humans, agent-based computational models presuppose (realistic) rules of behavior and try to challenge the validity of these rules by showing whether they can or cannot explain macroscopic regularities. In this introductory chapter, we argue that in order to study human populations, agent-based approaches are particularly useful from various theoretical perspectives. We urge demographers and other scholars interested in population studies to look at Agent-Based Computational Demography (ABCD) as a promising stream of research, which can improve our understanding of demographic behavior. We review and use the chapters of this book to substantiate our argumentations.

Views expressed in this paper are attributable to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the institutions they belong to.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axelrod, R. (1997): The Complexity of Cooperation. Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Prince ton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  2. Axtell, R. (2000): Why Agents ? On the Varied Motivations for Agent Computing in the Social Sciences. CSED Working Paper No. 17. Available online at: http: //www.brook.edu/dybdocroot/es/dynamics/papers/agents/agents.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Axtell, R.L., Epstein, J.M., Dean, J.S., Gumeran, G.J., Swedlund, A.C., Harburger, J., Chakravarty, S., Hammond, R., Parker, J., Parker, M. (2002): Population growth and collapse in a multiagent model of the Kayenta Anasazi in Long House Valley. PNAS 99, suppl. 3, 7275–7279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benenson, I., Omer, I., Hatna, E. (2003): Agent-Based Modeling of Householders’ Migration Behavior and its Consequences. This book, 97–115

    Google Scholar 

  5. Billari, F.C. (2000): Searching for Mates Using ‘Fast and Frugal’ Heuristics: a Demographic Perspective. In: Ballot G., Weisbuch G. (Eds.): Applications of Simulation to Social Sciences, 53–65, Hermes Science Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  6. Billari, F.C., Prskawetz, A., Fürnkranz J. (2003): On the Cultural Evolution of Age-at-Marriage Norms. This book, 139–157

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burch, T.K. (1996): Icons, Straw Men and Precision: Reflections on Demographic Theories of Fertility Decline. The Sociological Quarterly 37(1), 59–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burch, T.K. (2003): Data, Models, Theory and Reality. The Structure of Demographic Knowledge. This book, 19–40

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chattoe, E. (2003): The Role of Agent-Based Modelling in Demographic Explanation. This book, 41–54

    Google Scholar 

  10. Conte, R. (2000): The Necessity of Intelligent Agents for Social Simulation. In: Ballot G., Weisbuch G. (Eds.):Applications of Simulation to Social Sciences, 19–38, Hermes Science Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  11. Conte R., Castelfranchi C. (1995): Understanding the functions of norms in social groups through simulation. In: Gilbert N., Conte R. (Eds.): Artificial societies. The computer simulation of social life, 252–267, UCL Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Courgeau, D. (1995): Migration theories and behavioral models. International Journal of Population Geography 1 (1), 19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dean, J.S., Gumerman, G.J., Epstein, J.M., Axtell, R.L., Swedlund, A.C., Parker, M.T., McCarroll, S. (2000): Understanding Anasazi Culture Change Through Agent-Based Modeling. In: Kohler, T.A., Gumerman, G.J. (Eds.): Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies. Agent-Based Modeling of Social and Spatial Processes, 179–206, Santa Fe Institute, New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  14. Epstein, J.M., Axtell, R. (1996): Growing Artificial Societies. Social Science from the Bottom Up, Brookings Institutions Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ewert, U.C.; Roehl, M., Uhrmacher, A. (2003): Consequences of Mortality Crises in Pre-Modern European Towns: A Multiagent-Based Simulation Approach. This book, 175–196

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M., the ABC Research Group (1999): Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gilbert, N. Troitzsch, K.G. (1999): Simulation for the Social Scientist. Open University Press, Buckingham-Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  18. Halpin, B. (1999): Simulation in Society. American Behavioral Scientist 42(10), 1488–1508

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hammel, E.A., McDaniel, C.K., Wachter, K.W. (1979): Demographic Consequences of Incest Tabus: A Microsimulation Analysis. Science 205, 972–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hammel, E.A., Wachter, K.W. (1996): Evaluating the Slavonian Census of 1698. Part II: A microsimulation test and extension of the evidence. European Journal of Population 12 (4), 295–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hedström, P., Swedberg, R. (Eds.) (1998): Social Mechanisms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  22. Heiland, F. (2003): The Collapse of the Berlin Wall — Simulating State-Level East to West German Migration Patterns. This book, 73–96

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hobcraft, J. (2000): Moving Beyond Elaborate Description: Towards Understanding Choices About Parenthood. Paper presented at the FFS Flagship Conference, Brussels, May 29–31

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jager, W., Janssen, M.A. (2003): Diffusion Processes in Demographic Transitions: A Prospect on Using Multi Agent Simulation to Explore the Role of Cognitive Strategies and Social Interactions. This book, 55–72

    Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson, P.E. (1999): Simulation Modeling in Political Science. American Behavioral Scientist 42(10), 1509–1530

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kohler, T.A., Gumerman, G.J. (Eds.) (2000): Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies. Agent-Based Modeling of Social and Spatial Processes. Santa Fe Institute, New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  27. König, A., Möhring, M., Troitzsch, K.G. (2003): Agents, Hierarchies and Sustainability. This book, 197–210

    Google Scholar 

  28. Land, K.C. (1986): Methods for national population forecasts: a review. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81, 888–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lesthaeghe, R. (2000): Fertility and partnership change: FFS contributions and requirement s for the future. Paper presented at the FFS Flagship Conference, Brussels, May 29–31

    Google Scholar 

  30. Macy, M.W., Willer, R. (2002): From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling. Annual Review of Sociology 28, 143–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Murphy, M. (2003): Bringing behavior back into micro-simulation: Feedback mechanisms in demographic models. This book, 159–174

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nakazawa, M., Ohtsuka, R. (1997): Analysis of completed parity using microsimulation modeling. Mathematical Population Studies 6(3), 173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Palloni, A. (2000): Demographic analysis: new theories, new methods and new data. In: De Sandre P., Ongaro F. (Eds.): Demografia: presente e futuro, 61–88, Cleup, Padova

    Google Scholar 

  34. Riley, J., Sheps, M. (1966): An analytic simulation model of human reproduction with demographic and biological components. Population Studies 19, 297–310

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ruggles, S. (1993): Confessions of a microsimulator. Historical methods 26(4), 161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Saam, N.J. (1999): Simulating the micro-macro link: new approaches to an old problem and an application to military coups. Sociological Methodology 29, 43–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schelling, T.C. (1971): Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1, 143–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tesfatsion, L. (Eds.) (2001): Special Issue of Agent-based Computational Economics. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 25, 281–654

    Google Scholar 

  39. Todd, P.M. (1997): Searching for the next best mate. In: Conte R., Hegselmann R., Terna P. (Eds.): Simulating Social Phenomena, 419–436, Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  40. Todd, P.M., Billari, F.C. (2002): Population-Wide Marriage Pattern s Produced by Individual Mate-Search Heuristics. This book, 117–137

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tomassini, C., Wolf, D. (2000): Shrinking Kin Networks in Italy Due to Sustained Low Fertility. European Journal of Population 16, 353–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Van Imhoff, E., Post, W.J. (1998): Microsimulation methods for population projection. Population: An English Selection 10(1) [Special issue on “New Methodological Approaches in the Social Sciences”], 97–138

    Google Scholar 

  43. Vaupel, J.W., Carey, J.R., Christensen, K., Johnson, TE., Yashin, A.I., Holm, N.V., Iachine, I.A., Khazaeli, A.A., Liedo, P., Longo, Y.D., Zeng, Y., Manton, K.G., Curtsinger, J.W. (1998): Biodemographic Trajectories of Longevity. Science 280(5365), 855–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wachter, K.W. (1987): Microsimulation of household cycles. In: Bongaarts, J., Burch, T.K., Wachter, K.W. (Eds.): Family demography. Methods and their application, Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wilson, C. (1999): Evolutionary Theory and Historical Fertility Change. Population and Development Review 25, 531–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wolf, D. (2001): The Role of Microsimulation in Longitudinal Data Analysis. Canadian Studies in Population 28, 165–179

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Billari, F.C., Ongaro, F., Prskawetz, A. (2003). Introduction: Agent-Based Computational Demography. In: Billari, F.C., Prskawetz, A. (eds) Agent-Based Computational Demography. Contributions to Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2715-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2715-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1550-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-2715-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics