The Doha Round: A New Agreement on Agriculture?

  • James D. Gaisford
  • William A. Kerr


Ukraine, and other countries negotiating accession to the WTO, will ultimately have to conform to the requirements of the multilateral trading system. Trade in agricultural products, however, was only partially incorporated into the GATT system in the Uruguay Round. Since efforts are under way, now in conjunction with the wider Doha Round of negotiations, to bring agriculture closer to the norms of the international trading system, Ukraine faces a moving target. Consequently, this paper endeavours to provide some guidance on the likely directions for the agricultural trade regime.


European Union World Trade Organization Uruguay Round Export Subsidy Agricultural Trade 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Gaisford, J. D., J. E. Hobbs, W. A. Kerr, N. Perdikis, and M. D. Plunkett (2001): The Economics of Biotechnology.Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  2. Gaisford, J. D and W. A. Kerr (2001): Economic Analysis for Trade Negotiations. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  3. Gaisford, J. D. and W. A Kerr (forthcoming): Deadlock in Geneva: The Battle Over Export Subsidies in Agriculture. International Economic Journal.Google Scholar
  4. Hobbs, A. L., J. E Hobbs, G. E. Isaac, and W. A. Kerr (forthcoming): Ethics, Domestic Food Policy and Trade Law: Assessing the EU Animal Welfare Proposal to the WTO, Food Policy.Google Scholar
  5. Hobbs, A. L. and W. A. Kerr (2000): First Salvoes: A Guide to the Opening Proposals at the WTO Negotiations on Agricultural Trade. Agribusiness Paesaggio and Ambiente, 4(2), pp. 97–108.Google Scholar
  6. Isaac, G. E., M. Phillipson, and W. A. Kerr (2002): International Regulation of Trade in the Products of Biotechnology. Estey Centre Research Papers No. 2, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, Saskatoon, pp 159.Google Scholar
  7. Kerr, W. A. (2000): The Next Step Will be Harder: Issues for the New Round of Agricultural Negotiations at the World Trade Organization, Journal of World Trade, 34 (1), pp. 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kerr, W. A and J. E. Hobbs (2002): The North American-European Union Dispute Over Beef Produced Using Growth Hormones: A Major Test for the New International Trade Regime. The World Economy, 25 (2), pp. 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leger, L. A, J. D. Gaisford, and W. A Kerr (1999): Labour Market Adjustments to International Trade Shocks. In: S. Bhagwan Dahiya (ed.): The Current State of Economic Science, No.4, Rohtak, Spellbound Publications, pp. 2011–2034.Google Scholar
  10. Perdikis, N., W. A Kerr, and J. E. Hobbs (2001): Reforming the WTO to Defuse Potential Trade Conflicts in Genetically Modified Goods. World Economy, No. 24 (3), pp. 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rude, J. (2001): Multifunctionality: An Examination of the Issues and Remedies, In: Michelmann, H. J., J. Rude, J. Stabler, and G. Storey (eds.): Globalization and Agricultural Trade Policy, Lynne Rienner, Boulder, pp. 239–254.Google Scholar
  12. Russia, Ukraine to Push Against New Limits Set in EU Grains Deal, Inside US Trade, November 15, 2002.Google Scholar
  13. Skully, D. W. (2001): Economics of Tariff-Rate Quota Administration. Technical Bulletin No. 1893, Market and Trade Economics Division, Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington ( Scholar
  14. US-EU Deal will not Touch US Grains Exports, Caps Black Sea Wheat, Inside US Trade, November 8, 2002.Google Scholar
  15. Von Braun, J, P. Wobst, and U. Grote (2002): New Development Aspects of Agricultural World Trade. Bridges Between Trade and Sustainable Development, No.6 (5), pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
  16. WTO (2002a): WTO Members set Schedule to meet 12-Month Modalities Deadline. WTO News: 2002 Press Releases, Press/282, March 27. Available at Scholar
  17. WTO (2002b): WTO Agriculture Negotiations Backgrounder: The Issues, and Where We are Now. Updated October 2002. Available at http://www.wto.orgienglish/tratop_e/agric_e /negs_bkgrnd00_contents_e.htm.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • James D. Gaisford
    • 1
  • William A. Kerr
    • 2
  1. 1.University of CalgaryCanada
  2. 2.University of SaskatchewanCanada

Personalised recommendations