Zusammenfassung
Big asset management funds have an incentive to identify portfolio managers who show ex post investment results maximizing the fund utility. This analysis cannot be restricted on rate of returns as they do not take into account different levels of return volatility. Therefore performance is a much better measure than a return rate. Performance is a measure describing the relation between return and risk of an asset. Asset management reports in Germany and the Principality of Liechtenstein show that portfolio reporting gives information on rates of return, but no information on portfolio risk and performance ratios.
In the following we give an overview on traditional performance ratios and show the use of performance ratios in asset management. Using different ratios can lead to different rankings of portfolios. But which portfolio is the best from the investor’s viewpoint? We propose that this question can be answered looking at the portfolio situation of the investor. If a bank has a perfect overview on all assets of a client, the bank is in a position to identify the performance ratio leading to the optimal ranking decision of the client. In order to offer this valuable service the bank needs a very deep information of the clients personal wealth situation, which offers the bank an important competitive advantage in relation to other banks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
AIMR Association for Investment Management and Research (1999). Global Investment Performance Standards
Bodie, Z., Kane, A., Marcus, A.J. (2002). Investments, 5. Aufl., Boston
Copeland, T.E., Weston, J.F. (1988). Financial Theory and Corporate Policy, 3. Aufl., Reading
Ferguson, R. (1986). The Trouble with Performance Measurement, in: Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 12, pp. 4–9
Fischer (2000). zitiert in Steiner/Bruns 2002
Franke, G., Hax, H. (1999). Finanzwirtschaft des Unternehmens und Kapitalmarkt, 4. Aufl., Berlin
Gerke, W., Bank, M. (1998). Finanzierung, Stuttgart
Henriksson, R.D., Merton, R.C. (1981). On Market Timing and Investment Performance. II. Statistical Procedures for Evaluating Forecast Skills, in: Journal of Business, Vol. 54
Schiereck, D., Viebahn, M. (2003). Vermögensreporting — Informationsbereitstellung durch das Berichtswesen von Vermögensverwaltungen, European Business School, Department of Finance, Working Paper Series, No. 15
Sharpe, W.F. (1992). Asset Allocation: Management Style and Performance Measurement, in: Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 19, Winter, pp. 7–19
Spremann, K. (2003). Portfoliomanagement, 2. Aufl., München und Wien
Steiner, M., Bruns, C. (2002). Wertpapiermanagement, 8. Aufl., Stuttgart
Treynor, J.L., Mazuy, K. (1966). Can Mutual Funds Can Outguess the Market? in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 43
Wilkens, M., Scholz, H. (1999). Von der Treynor-Ratio zur Market Risk-Adjusted Performance, in: Finanz Betrieb, 1. Jg., pp. 308–313
Wittrock, C. (2000). Messung und Analyse der Performance von Wertschriftenportfolios, 3. Aufl., Bad Soden
Zimmermann, H. (1992). Performance-Messung im Asset-Management, in: Controlling, hrsg. von K. Spremann und E. Zur, Wiesbaden, pp. 49–109
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Menichetti, M.J. (2004). Die Performance-Darstellung von Wertschriften-Portfolios. In: Schädler, P., Menichetti, M.J. (eds) Private Banking im Qualitätswettbewerb um den Kunden. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2697-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2697-5_4
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0259-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-2697-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive