Open Access Rules and Equilibrium Broadband Deployment

  • Glenn A. Woroch
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)


Investment in advanced communications infrastructure promises such tantalizing payoffs as accelerated economic growth and enhanced national competitiveness. Relatively little disagreement arises in policy debates that such benefits are possible—usually only their size and distribution across the population are at issue. Bitter disputes, however, have occurred over which path will lead the communications sector to deploy these technologies most expeditiously and equitably.


Broadband Network Operating Profit Digital Subscriber Line Broadband Service Deployment Cost 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baer W (1995) Telecommunications infrastructure competition: The costs of delay. Telecommunications Policy 19(5): 351–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boone J (2000) Competitive pressure: The effects on investments in product and process innovation. Rand Journal of Economics 31(3): 549–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crandall R, Sidak G, Singer H (2002) The empirical case against asymmetric regulation of broadband Internet access. Berkeley Law and Technology Journal 17(1): 953–87Google Scholar
  4. Faulhaber G, Hogendorn C (2000) The market structure of broadband telecommunications. Journal of Industrial Economics 48(3): 305–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Floyd E, Gabel D (2003) An econometric analysis of the factors that influence the deployment of advanced telecommunications services. Draft August 31Google Scholar
  6. Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1985) Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology. Review of Economic Studies 52(3): 383–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1987) Understanding rent dissipation: On the use of game theory in industrial organization. American Economic Review 77(2): 176–81Google Scholar
  8. Gabel D, Huang G-L (2003) Promoting innovation: Impact of local competition and regulation on deployment of advanced telecommunications services for businesses. DraftGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilbert RJ, Newbery DMG (1982) Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. American Economic Review 72(3): 514–26Google Scholar
  10. Greenstein S, McMaster S, Spiller P (1995) The effect of incentive regulation on infrastructure modernization: Local exchange companies’ deployment of digital technology. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 4(2): 187–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haring J, Rettle M, Rohlfs J, Shooshan H (2002) UNE prices and telecommunications investment. Strategic Policy Research Inc. July 17Google Scholar
  12. Hausman J (1997) Valuation and the effect of regulation on new services in telecommunications. Brookings Papers: Microeconomics pp 1–38Google Scholar
  13. Hausman J (2000) Regulation by TSLRIC: Economic effects on investment and innovation. In: Sidak JG, Engel C, Knieps G (eds) Competition and regulation in telecommunications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  14. International Telecommunication Union (2003) The birth of broadband. ITU, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  15. Katz M, Shapiro C (1987) R&D rivalry with licensing or imitation. American Economic Review 77(3): 402–20Google Scholar
  16. Kridel D, Sappington D, Weisman D (1996) The effects of incentive regulation in the telecommunications industry: A survey. Journal of Regulatory Economics 9: 269–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee CH (2001) State Regulatory Commission treatment of advanced services: Results of a survey. National Regulatory Research Institute, MarchGoogle Scholar
  18. Owen BM, Rosston GL (2003) Local broadband access: Primum non nocere or primum processi? A property rights approach. Stanford University, SIEPR Discussion Paper 02-37, JulyGoogle Scholar
  19. Oxman J (1999) The FCC and the unregulation of the Internet. FCC, Office of Plans and Policy Working Paper No. 31, JulyGoogle Scholar
  20. Pindyck RS (2004) Mandatory unbundling and irreversible investment in telecom networks. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 10287, Cambridge, FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  21. Riordan M (1992) Regulation and preemptive technology adoption: Cable TV versus telephone companies. Rand Journal of Economics 23(3): 334–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rohlfs J, Jackson C, Kelley T (1991) Estimation of the loss to the US caused by the FCC’s delay in licensing cellular telecommunications. National Economic Research Associates, Washington DC, NovemberGoogle Scholar
  23. Willig R, Lehr W, Bigelow J, Levinson S (2002) Stimulating investment and the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Draft, October 11Google Scholar
  24. Woroch G (1998) Facilities competition and local network investment: Theory, evidence and policy implications. Industrial and Corporate Change 7(4): 601–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Woroch G (2000) Competition’s effect on investment in digital infrastructure. Draft, JulyGoogle Scholar
  26. Woroch G (2002) Open access rules and the broadband race. The Law Review of Michigan State University-Detroit College of Law 3: 719–42Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glenn A. Woroch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of California BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations