Innovation Management within the Plural Form Network

  • Gérard Cliquet
  • Minh-Ngoc Nguyen
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


Nowadays, most retail chains are organized in a network structure, which operates under the principals of mutual communication and cooperation for lower overhead cost, increased responsiveness and flexibility, and greater operational efficiency (Lozenzoni and Baden 1995). In addition, thanks to interfaces between many units, the network is a powerful tool to foster innovation. However, networks can also block innovation because of the divergence of interests among units (Hagedoorn 1995). A franchised network is an illustration of this, due to the fact that franchisees, as independent small business owner, have the right not to adopt all the modifications proposed by the franchiser. A solution is to use the plural form, associating franchise and company arrangements. In reality, the plural form is increasingly used in retailing; it has advantages over the pure franchised and wholly owned chains in terms of innovation.

This paper deals with innovation management within the plural form network. Firstly, difficulties in managing innovation faced by network operators are pointed out. Secondly, why the plural form could facilitate innovation is explained. Finally, the innovation process models are established, which highlight how innovations are made and managed in the plural form network. Data for analysis are obtained by interviews with network operators in France.

On the whole, this work tends to show the superiority of the plural form and has a practical purpose to help the plural form network to optimize the management of innovation projects.


Innovation Process Innovation Management Chain Operator Innovation Project Plural Form 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Allen TJ (1985) Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anchrol RS (1996) The Franchise as a Network Organization. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the International Society of Franchising, Honolulu, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barreyre PY (1980) Typologie des innovations. Revue Française de Gestion jan-feb:9–15Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bradach JL, Eccles RG (1989) Price, Authority and Trust: From Ideal types to Plural Forms. Annual Review of Sociology 15:97–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bradach JL (1997) Using Plural Form in the Management of Restaurant Chains. Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 2:276–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bradach JL (1998) Franchise organization. Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown JW, Utterback JM (1985) Uncertainty and technical Communication Patterns. Management Science 31, 3:301–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cliquet et al. (1998) Plural Form Networks: Franchise vs. Company Arrangements: Conflicting or Complementary organizations? Report on Research Contract Commissioned by the French Franchise Federation (FFF)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cliquet G (2000) Plural Forms in Store Networks: A Model for Store Network Evolution. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 10, 4:369–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cliquet G (2002) Les réseaux mixtes franchise/succursalisme: Apport de la littérature et implications pour le marketing des réseaux de points de vente. Recherche et Applications en Marketing 17, 1:57–73Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cliquet G, Perrigot R (2002) An Application of Survival Analysis to French Hotel Networks. Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Society of Franchising Conference, Orlando, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cooper RB, Zmud RW (1990) Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach. Management Science 36:123–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cooper RG (1993) Winning at New Products. Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Draf RL (1978) A Dual Core Model of Organizational Innovation. Academy of Management Journal 21:193–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Drucker P (1985) Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ebadi YM, Utterback JM (1984) The Effects of Communication on Technological Innovation. Management Science 30, 5:572–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ettlie JE (1980) Adequacy of Stage Models for Decisions on Adopting of Innovation. Psychological Reports 46:991–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fidler LA, Johnson JD (1984) Communication and Innovation Implementation. Academy of Management Review 9, 4:704–11Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fombrun CJ (1982) Strategies for Network Research in Organizations. Academy Management Review 7, 2: 280–91Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garvin DA (1993) Building a Learning Organization. Harvard Business Review, July-August:78–91Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gomez Arias JT (1995) Do Networks Really Foster Innovation? Management Decision 33, 9:52–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hagedoorn J (1995) A Note on International Market Leaders and Networks of Strategic Technology Partnering. Strategic Management Journal 16:241–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Håkansson H, Havila V, Pedersen AC (1999) Learning in Network. Industrial Marketing Management 28:443–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Håkansson H, Ford D (2002) How Should Company Interact in Business Networks? Journal of Business Research 55:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jallat F (1994) Innovation dans les services: les facteurs de success. Décisions Marketing 2: 23–30Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jallat F (1999) Spécificités des processus et gestion de l’innovation dans les services. Market Management 4:31–42Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lafontaine F, Shaw KL (1999) Targeting Managerial Control: Evidence from Franchising. Working paper, University of Michigan Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lewin-Solomons SB (1999) Innovation and Authority in Franchise System: An Empirical Exploration of the Plural Form. Journal paper no. J-18005 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Project No. 3530Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lewin-Solomons SB (1998) The Plural Form in Franchising: A Synergism of Market and Hierarchy. Working paper, University of Cambridge and Iowa State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liebmann HP, Foscht T, Angerer T (2003) Innovation in Retailing: Gradual or Radical Innovations of Business Models. European Retail Digest 37:55–60Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lozenzoni G, Baden Fuller C (1995) Creating a Strategic Center to Manage a Web of Partners. California Management Review 37, 3: 146–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Meyer AD, Goes JB (1988) Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multilevel Contextual Analysis. Academy of Management Journal 31:897–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Paswan AK, Wittman CM (2003) Franchise System and Knowledge Management. Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Society of Franchising Conference, San Antonio, TexasGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pelz DC (1983) Qualitative Case Histories of Urban Innovations: Are There Innovating Stage? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 30:60–7Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rogers EM (1983) Diffusion of Innovation. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Semlinger K (1993) Small Firms and Outsourcing as Flexibility Reservoirs of Large Firms. In: Graher G (ed) The Embedded Firm: On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks. Routledge, London New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Saren MA (1984) A Classification and Review of Models of the Intra-firm Innovation Process. R&D Management 14, 1:11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shane SA (1996) Hybrid Organizational Arrangements and Their Implications for Firm Growth and Survival: A Study of New Franchisors. Academy of Management Journal 39, 1:216–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sorenson O, Sørensen JB (2001) Finding the Right Mix: Organizational Learning, Plural Forms and Franchise Performance. Strategic Management Journal 22:713–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Souder WE, Moenaert RK (1992) Integrating Marketing and R&D Project Personnel within Innovation Projects: An Information Uncertainty Model. Journal of Management Studies 29, 4:485–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stanworth J, Price S, Purdy D, Zafiris N, Gandolfo A (1996) Business Format Franchising: Innovation and Creativity or Replication or Conformity? Proceedings of the 10th Annual conference of the International Society of Franchising, Honolulu, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stanworth J, Healeas S, Purdy D, Watson A, Stanworth C (2003) Entrepreneurial Teams, Intellectual Capital Acquisition and Knowledge Management-New Perspectives on Franchising as a Small Business Growth Strategy. Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Society of Franchising Conference, San Antonio, TexasGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gérard Cliquet
    • 1
  • Minh-Ngoc Nguyen
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Research on Economics and ManagementUniversity of Rennes 1 IGR-IAERENNES Cedex 7France
  2. 2.Center for Research on Economics and ManagementUniversity of Rennes 1 IREIMAR — Campus de BeaulieuRennesFrance

Personalised recommendations