• Michael Rauscher
  • Benjamin Lünenbürger
Part of the ZEW Economic Studies book series (ZEW, volume 26)


It is sometimes argued that globalisation undermines environmental policy because countries are tempted to use lax environmental standards to make domestic industries more competitive on world markets. Since each country tries to be competitive on world markets, environmental policy may suffer from a ‘race towards the bottom’. To avoid such developments it is frequently suggested to harmonise environmental standards or to introduce trade measures against ‘dirty’ goods from abroad in order to level the playing-field. Such suggestions rather contradict most trade and environmental economic theory. According to economic theory, environmental policy — in a world of perfect competition — should be determined by the country-specific endowments with environmental resources and not by internationally uniform standards. Factors influencing the endowments are physical and geographical conditions but also the willingness of the people to pay for environmental quality. Since these conditions can be different across countries, uniform environmental standards and/or trade measures are likely to be inefficient (see Bhagwati and Srinivasan, 1996, for instance). Consequently, trade policy should be rather independent from environmental policy.


Environmental Policy Price Elasticity Energy Price Final Good Energy Market 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barrett, S. (1994), Strategic Environmental Policy and International Trade, Journal of Public Economics 54, 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhagwati, J. and T.N. Srinivasan (1996), Trade and the Environment: Does Environmental Diversity Detract from the Case of Free Trade?, in: J. Bhagwati, R.E. Hudec (Eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade? Volume 1: Economic Analysis, Cambridge, 159–232.Google Scholar
  3. Burniaux, J.M. and J. Oliveira-Martins (2000), Carbon Emission Leakages: A General Equilibrium View, OECD, Economics Department Working Paper 242, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Copeland, B.R. and M.S. Taylor (2000), Free Trade and Global Warming: A Trade Theory View of the KyotoProtocol, NBER Working Paper No. w7657, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  5. Gürtzgen, N. and M. Rauscher (2000), Environmental Policy, Intra-Industry Trade, and Transfrontier Pollution, Environmental and Resource Economics 17, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoel, M. (1994), Efficient Climate Policy in the Presence of Free Riders, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27, 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoel, M. (1997), Environmental Policy with Endogenous Plant Locations, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 99, 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huntington, H.G. (1992), Inferred Demand and Supply Elasticities from a Comparison of World Oil Models, in: Sterner, T. (Ed.), International Energy Economics, London, 239–261.Google Scholar
  9. Krugman, P.R. (1979), Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade, Journal of International Economics 9, 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krugman, P.R. (1980), Scale Economies, Product Differentiation and the Pattern of Trade, American Economic Review 67, 298–307.Google Scholar
  11. Kuik, O.H. and H. Verbruggen (2001), The Kyoto Regime, Changing Patterns of International Trade, and Carbon Leakage, unpublished manuscript, Verbruggen.Google Scholar
  12. Markusen, J.R. (1975), International Externalities and Optimal Tax Structures, Journal of International Economics 5, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rauscher, M. (1997), International Trade, Factor Movements, and the Environment, Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. Rauscher, M. (2002), Environmental Policy in Open Economies and Leakage Problems, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Rauscher
    • 1
  • Benjamin Lünenbürger
    • 1
  1. 1.University of RostockRostockGermany

Personalised recommendations