Advertisement

Empirical Results

  • Patrick Heinecke
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

The basic features of our data will be described for our research sample of 663 MNCs and our survey sample of 96 MNCs – as the empirical results of this work draw upon both of these secondary and primary data sources. To gain insights into the geographical and sectoral origin of our research sample, we will describe these 663 MNCs along their home country and their home region according to the location of their corporate headquarters (Rugman 2000: 9; Rugman and Verbeke 2004: 4) and their industry membership (Rugman 2005b: 79–182; Rugman and Oh 2007: 39, 42–43). Furthermore, based on company data, we will illustrate how our sample firms develop on average over the sample period 2000–2008 – utilizing Fortune Global 500 data on a consolidated basis issued by the magazine Fortune (2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009).

Keywords

Regional Strategy Sample Firm Manifest Variable Regional Success Sales Revenue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  3. Enright, M. J. (2005a). Regional management centers in the Asia-Pacific. Management International Review, 45(1), 59–82.Google Scholar
  4. Enright, M. J. (2005b). The roles of regional management centers. Management International Review, 45(1), 83–102.Google Scholar
  5. Fortune. (2001). The Fortune Global 500. Fortune, 144(2), F1–F10.Google Scholar
  6. Fortune. (2002). The Fortune Global 500. Fortune, 146(2), F1–F10.Google Scholar
  7. Fortune. (2003). The Fortune Global 500. Fortune, 148(2), F1–F10.Google Scholar
  8. Fortune. (2004). The Fortune Global 500. Fortune, 150(2), F1–F10.Google Scholar
  9. Fortune. (2005). The Fortune Global 500. Fortune, 152(2), F1–F10.Google Scholar
  10. Fortune. (2006). The Fortune Global 500. Fortune, 154(2), F1–F10.Google Scholar
  11. Fortune. (2007). The Fortune Global 500. Fortune, 156(2), F1–F10.Google Scholar
  12. Fortune. (2008). The Fortune Global 500. Fortune, 158(2), F1–F10.Google Scholar
  13. Fortune. (2009). The Fortune Global 500. Fortune, 160(2), F1–F10.Google Scholar
  14. Giere, J., Wirtz, B. W., & Schilke, O. (2006). Mehrdimensionale Konstrukte. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 66(6), 678–695.Google Scholar
  15. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), New challenges to international marketing (Advances in international marketing, Vol. 20, pp. 277–319). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  16. Homburg, C., & Giering, A. (1996). Konzeptualisierung und Operationalisierung komplexer Konstrukte: Ein Leitfaden für die Marketingforschung. Marketing – Zeitschrift für Forschung und Praxis, 18(1), 5–24.Google Scholar
  17. Lasserre, P. (1996). Regional headquarters: The spearhead for Asia Pacific markets. Long Range Planning, 29(1), 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ohmae, K. (1985). Triad power: The coming shape of global competition. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. Rugman, A. M. (2000). The end of globalization. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  20. Rugman, A. M. (2005b). The regional multinationals: MNEs and “global” strategic management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rugman, A. M., & Oh, C. H. (2007). Multinationality and regional performance, 2001–2005. In A. M. Rugman (Ed.), Regional aspects of multinationality and performance (Research in global strategic management, Vol. 13, pp. 31–43). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2004). A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Verbeke, A., Li, L., & Goerzen, A. (2009). Toward more effective research on the multinationality-performance relationship. Management International Review, 49(2), 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. von der Lippe, P., & Kladroba, A. (2002). Repräsentativität von Stichproben. Marketing – Zeitschrift für Forschung und Praxis, 24(2), 139–145.Google Scholar
  25. Yeung, H. W.-C., Poon, J., & Perry, M. (2001). Towards a regional strategy: The role of regional headquarters of foreign firms in Singapore. Urban Studies, 38(1), 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Heinecke
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations