The Role of Extraordinary Creativity in Organizational Response to Digital Security Threats

  • Maurizio Cavallari


The purpose of this paper is to provide a framework for exploring and studying extraordinary creativity when it comes to an organizational response to digital security. Three areas – inspiration, transformational leadership, and social capital – are argued to significantly impact the creative ability of IT professionals charged with the task of responding to digital security threats. Drawing from diverse literature, the framework offered has the potential to form a foundation for future research to enhance creativity to extraordinary levels when it comes to digital security.


Social Capital Transformational Leadership Blind Spot Leadership Behavior Unforeseen Event 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Cyberwar: The threat from the internet, The Economist, July 1st 2010, pag. 23–26. UK.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khansa, L., Liginlal, D. (2009). “Quantifying the benefits of investing in information security”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 52, No. 11, pp. 113–117.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bodin, L., Gordon, L., Loeb, M. (2008). “Information security and risk management”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 64–68.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fal', A. (2010). “Standardization in information security management”, Cybernetics & Systems Analysis, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 512–515.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Franken, R. E., (2006) Human Motivation. 6th Edition. London; Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stein, M. I. (1984) Stimulating Creativity, Vol. 1: Individual Procedures (New York, Academic Press).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ciborra, C. (2002) The Labyrinths of Information, Oxford University Press, UK, (3), 29–53.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seltzer, K. and Bentley, T. (1999) The Creative Age: Knowledge and Skills for the New Economy (London, Demos).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Amabile, T. M. (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cunning (Eds) Researching Organizational Behaviour (Greenwich, CT, JAI).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Amabile, T.M.(1996) Creativity in Context (Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity) (Boulder, CO, Westview).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barron, F. (1988) Putting creativity to work. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) The Nature of Creativity (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press) pag. 17.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mayer, R. E. (1999) Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of Creativity (New York, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bain P., Mann L., Pirola-Merlo A., 2001, “The innovation imperative: the relationship between team climate, and performance in research and development teams”, Small Group Research, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 55–73.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988) Society, culture and person: a system view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) The Nature of Creativity (New York, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996) Creativity, Flow, and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention (London, Rider Books).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999) Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of Creativity (New York, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perry-Smith J. E. & Shalley C. E., 2003, The social side of creativity: a static and dynamic social network perspective, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 89–106.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Järvinen, P. (1997) The new classification of research approaches. In: Zemanek H. (Eds): The IFIP Pink Summary - 36 years of IFIP. IFIP, Austria (pp. 124–131).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Järvinen, P. (2000) Research questions guiding selection of an appropriate research method. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Vienna, A.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gadamer, H. G. (1989) Truth and method. 2nd rev. ed., Sheed and Ward, London, UK.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mautner, T. (1996) A dictionary of philosophy. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Walsham, G. (1996) The emergence of interpretivism in IS research. Information Systems Research (6) (pp. 376–394).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Klein, H. K. & Myers, M. D. (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive Field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly (23) (pp. 67–94).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Klein, H. K. & Myers, M. D. (2001) A classification scheme for interpretive research in information systems. In: Trauth EM (Eds) Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends. Idea Group Publishing, Hersney, PA (pp. 218–239).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bassett-Jones, N. (2005), The Paradox of Diversity Management, Creativity and Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14: 169–175.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goleman, D., Kaufman et al. (1992) The Creative Spirit (New York, Dutton).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pirola-Merlo A., Mann L., 2004, “The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: aggregating across people and time”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol 25, pp. 235–257.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Taggar S., 2002, Individual Creativity and Group Ability to Utilize Individual Creative Resources: A Multilevel Model”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 315–330.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Amabile T. M., Barsade S. G., Staw B. M., 2005, “Affect and Creativity at Work”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 50, September, pp. 367–403.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Unsworth K., 2001, Unpacking Creativity, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 289–297.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sundgren M., Dimenaes E., Gustafsson J. E. & Selart, 2005, Drivers of organizational creativity: a path model of creative climate in pharmaceutical R&D, R&D Management, Vol. 35, No. 4 , pp. 359–374.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sherwood, D. Smart Things to Know About Innovation and Creativity, 2001, John Wiley& Sons.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pretorius M., Millard S. M., Kruger M. E., 2005, “Creativity, innovation and implementation: Management experience, venture size, life cycle stage, race and gender as moderators”, South Africa Journal of Business Management, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 55–68.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kwasniewska J., Necka E., 2004, “Perception of the Climate for Creativity in the Workplace: the Role of the Level in the Organization and Gender”, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 187–196.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Leenders R. Th. A. J. Van Engelen J. M. L. and Kratzer J., 2003, “Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective”, Journal of Engineering Technology Management, Vol. 20, pp. 69–92.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thrash, T. M., Maruskin, L. A., Cassidy, S. E., Fryer, J. W., Ryan, R. M., 2010, “Mediating between the muse and the masses: Inspiration and the actualization of creative ideas”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 98, No. 3, pp.469–487.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jaussi, K. S., Dionne, S. D., 2003, “Leading for creativity: The role of unconventional leader behavior”, Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 15 No. 4–5, pp. 475–498.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J. (Eds.) (1994). Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cialdini, R. B. (1989). Commitment and consistency: Hobgoblins of the mind. In H. J. Leavitt, L. R. Pondy, and D. M. Boje (Eds.), Readings in Managerial Psychology (4th ed., pp. 145–182) (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhou, J., Shinm S. J., Brass, D. J., Choi, J., Zhang, Z. (2009). “Social networks, personal values, and creativity: Evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 94, No. 6, pp. 1544–1552.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Adler, P. S., Kwon, S. (2002). “Social capital: Prospects for a new concept”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27, pp. 17–40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations