Open Innovation and Crowdsourcing: The Case of Mulino Bianco



In this paper, authors focus on the open innovation and crowdsourcing experience of an Italian firm the Mulino Bianco. Crowdsourcing is currently one of the most discussed keywords within the open innovation community. Crowdsourcing opens the company’s innovation funnel – the scope for screening ideas. Therefore, the firms gain more ideas for innovations. The major question for both research and business is how to find and lever the enormous potential of the collective intelligence to broaden the scope of open the R&D process.


Innovation Process Open Innovation Collective Intelligence Page View Market Launch 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Chesbrough, H.W. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, Harvard Business School Press Books.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rigby, D., and Zook, C. 2002. Open-market innovation. Harvard Business Review, October, 80–89.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hagedoorn, J. 1993. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14:371–385.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., and Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41:116–145.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sakakibara, M. 2001. Cooperative research and development: Who participates and in which industries do projects take place? Research Policy, 30:993–1018.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Von Hippel, E., and Von Krogh, G. 2003. Open Source Software and the ‘Private-Collective’ Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science, Organization Science (14:2), pp. 209–223.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carmel, E. 2006. Building Your Information Systems from the Other Side of the World: How Infosys Manages Time Zone Differences, MISQ Executive (5:1), pp. 43–53.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carmel, E., and Agarwal, R. 2001. Tactical Approaches for Alleviating Distance in Global Software Development, IEEE Software (18:2), pp. 22–29.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carmel, E., and Tjia, P. 2005. Offshoring Information Technology: Sourcing and Outsourcing to a Global Workforce, Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bonabeau E. 2009.Decisions 2.0: The Power of Collective Intelligence, MIT Sloan Management Review.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dahlander, L., and Magnusson, M. G. 2005. Relationships between Open Source Software Companies and Communities: Observations from Nordic Firms, Research Policy (34), pp. 481–493.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fichman, R. G. 2004. Going Beyond the Dominant Paradigm for IT Innovation Research: Emerging Concepts and Methods, Journal of the Association for Information Systems (5:8), pp. 314–355.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Howe, J. 2006. The rise of crowdsourcing, Wired, (14:6).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CagliariCagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations