Advertisement

Patent-Based R&D Strategies: The Case of STMicroelectronics’ Lab-on-Chip

  • Alberto Di Minin
  • Daniela Baglieri
  • Fabrizio Cesaroni
  • Andrea Piccaluga
Chapter

Abstract

R&D strategy formulation represents a critical task for those firms that base their competitive advantage on innovation. Different sources of information must be accessed in this respect, among which patents. Conventional patent analysis has commonly focused on factual information, while less scholarly attention has been devoted to the strategic role of patent analysis in supporting R&D strategic planning. Accordingly to this view, we conducted a case study of a multinational company that performed several patent analysis to enter in a new market domain. Although these findings can not be generalized, they shed new lights on the several tasks patent analysis might perform and the relevance to conceive patent information as a source of Business Intelligence Systems. In this respect, firms might include patent analysis as part of their Decision Support Systems and, consequently, invest in new competences and skills in order to handle complexity linked to the increasing amount of available patent data.

Keywords

Intellectual Property Patent Data International Patent Classification Scholarly Attention Patent Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Hall B.H. 2004. Exploring the Patent Explosion. In NBER Working Paper. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kortum S, Lerner J. 1999. What is behind the recent surge in patenting? Research Policy 28(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Badaracco JL. 1991. The Knowledge Link. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Levin RC. 1986. A New Look at the Patent System. The American Economic Review 76(2): 199–202.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR, Winter SG. 1984. Survey Research on R&D Appropriability and Technological Opportunity: Part 1. In Yale University Working Paper. Yale University.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mansfield E. 1981. Composition of R-and-D Expenditures – Relationship to Size of Firm, Concentration, and Innovative Output. Review of Economics and Statistics 63(4): 610–615.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rivette KG, Kline D. 1999. Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ernst H. 2003. Patent Information for Strategic Technology Management. World Patent Information 25(3): 233–242.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee S, Seol H, Park Y. 2008. Using patent information for designing new product and technology: keyword based technology roadmapping. R & D Management 38(2): 169–188.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chesbrough HW. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu CY, Yang JC. 2008. Decoding patent information using patent maps. Data Science Journal, 7, 14–22.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Malerba F, Orsenigo L. 1996. Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific. Research Policy, 25, 451–478.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu SJ, Shyu J. 1997. Strategic planning for technology development with patent analysis. International Journal of Technology Management 13(5–6): 661–680.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Narin G, Noma E.1987. Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy 16, 143–155.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bosworth DL. 1984. Foreign patent flows to and from the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 13, 115–124.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schultze U, Leidner DE. 2002. Studying knowledge management in information systems research: discourses and theoretical assumptions. MIS Q 26(3):213–242.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eisenhardt KM.1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grindley PC, Teece DJ. 1997. Managing intellectual capital: Licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics. California Management Review 39(2): 8–41.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Di Minin
    • 1
  • Daniela Baglieri
    • 2
  • Fabrizio Cesaroni
    • 3
  • Andrea Piccaluga
    • 1
  1. 1.Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, MAIN LabPisaItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Studi e Ricerche Economico-Aziendali ed AmbientaliUniversità di MessinaMessinaItaly
  3. 3.Departamento de Economía de la EmpresaUniversidad Carlos III de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations