Advertisement

Managing Creativity and Innovation in Web 2.0: Lead Users as the Active Element of Idea Generation

  • R. Consoli
Chapter

Abstract

This paper discusses the applicability of von Hippel’s lead user concept in a constellation of blogs. The lead user model represents a formal theory designed specifically for identify innovators. In order to examine the applicability of the lead user method, we proposed an approach based on Social Network Analysis. We chose blogs’ constellation based on Architecture to achieve our purpose. In this perspective, Architecture is only an example of creativity and of sharing interest among the sources of innovation.

The results of study indicates that the method of Social Network Analysis may be suitable for identifying the likely source of innovation. This paper illustrates the importance of quantitative approaches as tool to join theoretical and classical framework with actual growth of virtual communities, web-applications commonly associated with the term Web 2.0.

Keywords

Open Innovation Social Network Analysis Online Community Virtual Community Network Analysis Proceed 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Amabile, T.M. (1983) The Social Psychology of Creativity, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baron, R. (2007) Behavioral and Cognitive factors in Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1:167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., Freeman, L.C. (2002) Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis, Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eco, U. (2004) Combinatoria della Creatività, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Franke, N., Shah, S. (2003) How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users, Research Policy 32.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Franke, N., von Hippel, E., Schreier, M. (2006) Finding commercially attractive user innovations: a test of lead-user theory, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4):301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Füller, J., Bartl, M., Ernst, H., Mühlbacher, H. (2006) Community Based Innovation. How to Integrate Members of Virtual Communities into New Product Development, Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1): 57–73.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jeppesen, LB, Frederiksen, L. (2006) Why do Users Contribute to Firm-hosted User Communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments, Organization Science, 17: 45–63.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Milgram, S. (1967) The Small-World Problem, Psychology Today, 1:62–67.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller K., Fabian F., Lin S. (2009) Strategies for online communities, Strategic Management Journal, 30:305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nambisan, S. (2002) Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: Toward a theory, Academy of Management Review, 27(3):309–413.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nonaka, I. (1998) The Knowledge-Creating Company, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simonton, D.K. (1999) Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Von Hippel, E. (1988) The Sources of Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Von Hippel, E. (2001) Perspective: User toolkits for innovation, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(4): 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MessinaMessinaItaly

Personalised recommendations