Advertisement

A Customizable Glanceable Peripheral Display for Monitoring and Accessing Information from Multiple Channels

  • D. Angelucci
  • A. Cardinali
  • L. Tarantino
Chapter

Abstract

Nowadays the availability of virtually infinite information sources over the web makes information overload a severe problem to be addressed by tools able to aggregate and deliver information from selected channels in a personalized way. The support provided by portals (e.g., iGoogle) forces users to abandon primary tasks to monitor useful information. Feed readers are sometimes based on peripheral notifications that do not interfere with primary tasks but are often mostly textual. In this paper we present a customizable glanceable peripheral display able to aggregate notifications from multiple sources (e.g., email, news, weather forecast) as well as to provide quick access to information sources. The design is based on state-of-the-art guidelines and on preliminary usability studies conducted at mockup level both on the abstract model and on its realization.

Keywords

Primary Task Traffic Information Detailed Component Redundant Code Synthetic Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Angelucci, D. (2009) Un display periferico per la notifica di informazioni critiche: architettura e sviluppo del sistema. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica e dell’Informazione, Università degli Studi dell’Aquila, Master Thesis.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angelucci, D., Di Paolo S., Tarantino L. (2009). Designing a glanceable peripheral display for severity based multiple alarm visualization. In L. Lo Bello & G. Iannizzotto (Eds.) Proc of 2 nd Int Conf on Human System Interaction, HIS’09, IEEE Catalog Number: CFP0921D-USB, ISBN: 978-1-4244-3960-7, Library of Congress: 2009900916, Track TT4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cardinali, A., (2010) Visualizzazione e notifica periferica di informazioni in contesto multi-source: usabilità ed implementazione di un caso. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica e dell’Informazione, Università degli Studi dell’Aquila, Master Thesis..Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Di Paolo S. & Tarantino L. (2009). A peripheral notification display for multiple alerts: design rationale. In A. D’Atri & D. Saccà (Eds.) Information systems: people, organizations, Institutions, and Technologies, (pp. 521.528). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gantz J., Boyd A., Dowling S. (2009). Cutting the Clutter: Tackling Information Overload at the Source. http://www.xerox.com/assets/motion/corporate/pages/programs/information-overload/pdf/Xerox-white-paper-3-25.pdf
  6. 6.
    Matthews T., Forlizzi J., Rohrbach S. (2006). Designing glanceable peripheral displays. EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley, Technical Report No. EECS-2006-113. http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2006/EECS-2006-113.pdf
  7. 7.
    Matthews T., Dey A. K., Mankoff J., Carter S., Rattenbury T. (2004). A toolkit for managing user attention in peripheral displays. In S. Feiner & J. A. Landay (Eds.), Proc of the 17th Annu. ACM Symp. on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 247–256), Santa Fe: ACM.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McCrickard D. S., Catrambone R., Stasko J. (2001). Evaluating animation in the periphery as a mechanism for maintaining awareness. In M. Hirose (Ed.) Proc IFIP TC.13 Int. Conf. on Human Computer Interaction INTERACT'01 (pp. 148–156). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mc Farlane, D. (1999). Coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. In M. A. Sasse & C Johnson (Ed.) Human Computer Interaction INTERACT’99 (pp. 295.303). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hess. S. M. & Detweiler, M. C. (1994). Training to reduce the disruptive effects of interruptions. Proc of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 38 th annual meeting (1173–1177). Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nielsen, J. (2000) Why You Only Need to Test With 5 Users. In Alertbox, March 19, 2000. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html
  12. 12.
    Rhodes J. S., Benoit G. E., Payne D. G. (2000). Factors affecting memory for dynamically changing system parameters: implications for interface design. In Proc of IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress (pp. 284–285). Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    van Dantzich M., Robbins D., Horvitz E., Czerwinski M. (2002). Scope: Providing Awareness of Multiple Notifications at a Glance. In M. De Marsico, S. Levialdi, E. Panizzi (Eds.) Proc of the 6th Int. Working Conf. on Advanced Visual Interfaces AVI 2002 (pp. 157–166). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Istituto di Analisi dei Sistemi ed Informatica Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IASI-CNR)RomaItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica e dell’InformazioneUniversità degli Studi dell’AquilaL’AquilaItaly

Personalised recommendations