Advertisement

The Value of Business Metadata: Structuring the Benefits in a Business Intelligence Context

  • D. Stock
  • R. Winter
Chapter

Abstract

Business metadata (BM) plays a crucial role in increasing data quality of information systems (IS), especially in terms of data believability, ease of understanding, and accessibility. Despite its importance BM is primarily discussed from a technical perspective, while its business value is scarcely addressed. Therefore, this article aims to contribute to the further development of existing research by providing a conceptual framework of qualitative and quantitative benefits. A financial service provider case is presented that demonstrates how this conceptual framework has successfully been applied in a two-stage cost-benefit analysis.

Keywords

Credit Risk User Profile Business Intelligence Improve Data Quality Financial Service Provider 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Luftman, J.N., Kempaiah, R., Rigoni, E.H.: Key Issues for IT Executives 2008. MISQ Executive 8, pp. 151–159 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., Chowa, C.: Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants. Management Science 52, pp. 1849–1864 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wixom, B.H., Watson, H.J.: An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success. MIS Quarterly 25, pp. 17–41 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, R.Y., Strong, D.M.: Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems 12, pp. 5–34 (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jarke, M., Lenzerini, M., Vassiliou, Y., Vassiliadis, P.: Fundamentals of Data Warehouses. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foshay, N., Mukherjee, A., Taylor, A.: Does Data Warehouse End-User Metadata Add Value? Communications of the ACM 50, pp. 70–77 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foshay, N.: The Influence of End-user Metadata on User Attitudes toward, and Use of, a Data Warehouse. IBM, Somers (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schulze, K.-D., Besbak, U., Dinter, B., Overmeyer, A., Schulz-Sacharow, C., Stenzel, E.: Business Intelligence-Studie 2009. Steria Mummert Consulting AG, Hamburg (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shankaranarayanan, G., Even, A.: Managing Metadata in Data Warehouses: Pitfalls and Possibilities. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 14, pp. 247–274 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shankaranarayanan, G., Even, A.: The metadata enigma. Communications of the ACM 49, pp. 88–94 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fisher, C.W., Chengalur-Smith, I., Ballou, D.P.: The Impact of Experience and Time on the Use of Data Quality Information in Decision Making. Information System Research 14, pp. 170–188 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Even, A., Shankaranarayanan, G., Watts, S.: Enhancing Decision Making with Process Metadata: Theoretical Framework, Research Tool, and Exploratory Examination. In: Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28, pp. 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. Decision Support Systems 15, pp. 251–266 (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Gengler, C.E., Rossi, M., Hui, W., Virtanen, V., Bragge, J.: The Design Science Research Process: A Model for Producing and Presenting Information Systems Research. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, pp. 83–106. (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dempsey, L., Heery, R.: Metadata: A Current View of Practice and Issues. Journal of Documentation 54, pp. 145–172 (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tannenbaum, A.: Metadata Solutions: Using Metamodels, Repositories, XML, and Enterprise Portals to Generate Information on Demand. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marco, D.: Building and Managing the Meta Data Repository. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, Chichester, u.a. (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Müller, R., Stöhr, T., Rahm, E.: An Integrative and Uniform Model for Metadata Management in Data Warehousing Environments. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Design and Management of Data Warehouses, pp. 12–28. ACM Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bauer, A., Günzel, H.: Data Warehouse Systeme - Architektur, Entwicklung, Anwendung. dpunkt.verlag, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vaduva, A., Vetterli, T.: Metadata Management for Data Warehousing: An Overview. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 10, pp. 273–298 (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    DAMA: The DAMA Guide to the Data Management Body of Knowledge. Technics Publications, New Jersey (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Darke, P., Shanks, G.: Stakeholder viewpoints in requirements definition: A framework for understanding viewpoint development approaches. Requirements Engineering 1, pp. 88–105 (1996)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leité, J.C.S.P., Freeman, P.A.: Requirements Validation Through Viewpoint Resolution. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 17, pp. 1253–1269 (1991)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Whitman, M.R., Mattord, H.H.: Principles of Information Security. Course Technology (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ackoff, R.L.: From Data to Wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 16, pp. 3–9 (1989)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wand, Y., Wang, R.Y.: Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Communications of the ACM 39, pp. 86–95 (1996)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hüner, K.M., Otto, B.: The Effect of Using a Semantic Wiki for Metadata Management: A Controlled Experiment. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–9. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stock, D., Gubler, P.: A Data Model for Terminology Management of Analytical Information. In: Proceedings of European Students Workshop on Information System, pp. 1–14. (2009)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chengalur-Smith, I., Ballou, D.P., Pazer, H.L.: The Impact of Data Quality Information on Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 11, pp. 853–864 (1999)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shankaranarayanan, G., Watts-Sussman, S.: A Relevant Believable Approach for Data Quality Assessment. In: Proceedings of the MIT International Conference on Information Quality, pp. 178–189. (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Information ManagementUniversity of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations