Skip to main content

Graphical Models for Clustered Binary and Continuous Responses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Directional and Linear Statistics

Abstract

Graphical models for clustered data mixed with discrete and continuous responses are developed. Discrete responses are assumed to be regulated by some latent continuous variables and particular link functions are used to describe the regulatory mechanisms. Inferential procedures are constructed using the full-information maximum likelihood estimation and observed/empirical Fisher information matrices. Implementation is carried out by stochastic versions of the generalized EM algorithm. As an illustrative application, clustered data from a developmental toxicity study is re-investigated using the directed graphical model and the proposed algorithms. A new interesting directed association between two mixed outcomes reveals. The proposed methods also apply to cross-sectional data with discrete and continuous responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amemiya T (1985) Advanced econometrics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berger J (2000) Bayesian analysis: A look at today and thoughts of tomorrow. J Am Stat Assoc 95:1269–1276

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bollen K (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Broniatowski M, Celeux G, Diebolt J (1983) Reconnaissance de mélanges de densités par un algorithme d’apprentissage probabiliste. In: Diday E (ed) Data analysis and informatics, vol 3. Amsterdam, North Holland, pp 359–374

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cappé O, Robert C (2000) Markov chain monte carlo: 10 years and still running! J Am Stat Assoc 95:1282–1286

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Catalano P, Ryan L (1992) Bivariate latent variable models for clustered discrete and continuous outcomes. J Am Stat Assoc 87:651–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Celeux G, Diebolt J (1983) A probabilistic teacher algorithm for iterative maximum likelihood estimation. In: Bock H (ed) Classification and related methods of data analysis. Amsterdam, North Holland, pp 617–623

    Google Scholar 

  8. Celeux G, Diebolt J (1985) The SEM algorithm: a probabilistic teacher algorithm derived from the EM algorithm for the mixture problem. Comput Stat Q 2:73–82

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chan J, Kuk A (1997) Maximum likelihood estimation for probit-linear mixed models with correlated random effects. Biometrics 53:86–97

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Daniels M, Pourahmadi M (2002) Bayesian analysis of covariance matrices and dynamic models for longitudinal data. Biometrika 89:553–566

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Delyon B, Lavielle M, Moulines E (1999) Convergence of a stochastic approximation version of the EM algorithm. Ann Stat 27:94–128

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Dempster A, Laird N, Rubin D (1977) Maximum likelihood estimation form incomplete data via the em algorithm (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Series B 39:1–38

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Dunson D (2000) Bayesian latent variable models for clustered mixed outcomes. J R Stat Soc Series B 62:355–366

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Dunson D, Chen Z, Harry J (2003) A bayesian approach for joint modeling of cluster size and subunit-specific outcomes. Biometrics 59:521–530

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards D (1990) Hierarchical interaction models (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Series B 52:3–20

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Edwards D, Lauritzen S (2001) The TM algorithm for maximising a conditional likelihood function. Biometrika 88:961–972

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Gueorguieva R, Agresti A (2001) A correlated probit model for joint modelling of clustered binary and continuous responses. J Am Stat Assoc 96:1102–1112

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Gueorguieva R, Sanacora G (2006) Joint analysis of repeatedly observed continuous and ordinal measures of disease severity. Stat Med 25:1307–1322

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Haavelmo T (1943) The statistical implications of a system of simultaneous equations. Econometrica 11:1–12

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Heckman J, MaCurdy T (1980) A life cycle model of female labour supply. Rev Econ Stud 47:47–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Koster J (1996) Markov properties of non-recursive causal models. Ann Stat 24:2148–2177

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Lauritzen S, Wermuth N (1989) Graphical models for associations between variables, some of which are qualitative and some quantitative. Ann Stat 17:31–57

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin X, Ryan L, Sammel M, Zhang D, Padungtod C, Xu X (2000) A scaled linear mixed model for multiple outcomes. Biometrics 56:593–601

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Louis T (1982) Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Series B 44:226–233

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. McLachlan GJ, Krishnan T (1997) The EM algorithm and extensions. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Miglioretti D (2003) Latent transition regression for mixed outcomes. Biometrics 59:710–720

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Price C, Kimmel C, Tyl R, Marr M (1985) The developmental toxicity of ethylene glycol in rats and mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 81:113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rochon J (1996) Analyzing bivariate repeated measures for discrete and continuous outcome variables. Biometrics 52:740–750

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Roy J, Lin X, Ryan L (2003) Scaled marginal models for multiple continuous outcomes. Biostatistics 4:371–383

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Sammel M, Lin X, Ryan L (1999) Multivariate linear mixed models for multiple outcomes. Stat Med 18:2479–2492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wei G, Tanner M (1999) A Monte Carlo implementation of the EM algorithm and the poor man’s data augmentation algorithm. J Am Stat Assoc 85:699–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zellner A (1962) An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. J Am Stat Assoc 57:348–368

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin T. Wells .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wells, M.T., Zhang, D. (2011). Graphical Models for Clustered Binary and Continuous Responses. In: Wells, M., SenGupta, A. (eds) Advances in Directional and Linear Statistics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2628-9_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics