Advertisement

Literature Review

  • René Rohrbeck
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

search on corporate foresight has its roots in the term strategic foresight. The reason for choosing the term corporate foresight in this thesis is to emphasize that the research is aimed at understanding foresight applied in private firms as opposed to the application in the public domain.

Keywords

Strategic Management Radical Innovation Contingency Factor Dynamic Capability Contingency Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abernathy W, Townsend P (1975) Technology, productivity and Process change. Technol Forecast Soc Change 7(4):379–396Google Scholar
  2. Adner R (2002) When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strateg Manage J 23(8):667–688Google Scholar
  3. Adner R, Zemsky P (2005) Disruptive technologies and the emergence of competition. Rand J Econ 36(2):229–254Google Scholar
  4. Afuah AN, Utterback JM (1997) Responding to structural industry changes: a technological evolution perspective. Ind Corp Change 6(1):183–202Google Scholar
  5. Allen TJ, Piepmeier JM, Cooney S (1971) International Technological Gatekeeper. Technol Rev 73(5):36–43Google Scholar
  6. Amanatidou E, Guy K (2008) Interpreting foresight process impacts: steps towards the development of a framework conceptualising the dynamics of foresight systems’. Technol Forecast Soc Change 75(4):539–557Google Scholar
  7. Ambrosini V, Bowman C (2009) What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? Int J Manage Rev 11(1):29–49Google Scholar
  8. Anderson J (1997) Technology foresight for competitive advantage. Long Range Plann 30(5):665–677Google Scholar
  9. Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant design – a cyclical model of technological-change. Adm Sci Q 35(4):604–633Google Scholar
  10. Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW (2009) Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ Sci 20(4):696–717Google Scholar
  11. Ansoff HI (1980) Strategic issue management. Strateg Manage J 1(2):131–148Google Scholar
  12. Ansoff HI, Declerck RP, Hayes RL (1976) From strategic planning to strategic management. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Arendt LA, Priem RL, Ndofor HA (2005) A CEO-adviser model of strategic decision making. J Manage 31(5):680–699Google Scholar
  14. Arnold HM (2003) Technology shocks: origins, management responses and firm performance. Physica Verlag Springer-Verlag GmbH & Co.KG, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  15. Ashton WB, Klavans RA (1997) Keeping abreast of science and technology: technical intelligence for business. Battelle Press, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  16. Bahrami H (1992) The emerging flexible organization – perspectives from Silicon Valley. Calif Manage Rev 34(4):33–52Google Scholar
  17. Barker D, Smith DJH (1995) Technology foresight using roadmaps. Long Range Plann 28(2):21–28Google Scholar
  18. Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage 17(1):99–120Google Scholar
  19. Bayus BL, Kang W, Agarwal R (2007) Creating growth in new markets: a simultaneous model of firm entry and price. J Prod Innov Manage 24(2):139–155Google Scholar
  20. Becker P (2002) Corporate foresight in Europe: a first overview working paper European Commission. European Commission, Brussels, p 31Google Scholar
  21. Bellone F et al (2008) Market selection along the firm life cycle. Ind Corp Change 17(4):753–777Google Scholar
  22. Bessant J et al (2005) Managing innovation beyond the steady state. Technovation 25(12):1366–1376Google Scholar
  23. Blackman DA, Henderson S (2004) How foresight creates unforeseen futures: the role of doubting. Futures 36(2):253–266Google Scholar
  24. Blind K, Cuhls K, Grupp H (1999) Current foresight activities in central Europe. Technol Forecast Soc Change 60(1):15–35Google Scholar
  25. Bogner WC, Barr PS (2000) Making sense in hypercompetitive environments: a cognitive explanation for the persistence of high velocity competition. Organ Sci 11(2):212–226Google Scholar
  26. Bondu J (2001) Benchmarking des Pratiques d’Intelligence Économique Intelligence Scientifique, Technique et Economique. ESIEE, Paris, p 126Google Scholar
  27. Bourgeois LJ, Eisenhardt KM (1988) Strategic decision-processes in high-velocity environments – 4 cases in the microcomputer industry. Manage Sci 34(7):816–835Google Scholar
  28. Breiner S, Cuhls K, Grupp H (1994) Technology foresight using a Delphi approach – a Japanese-German cooperation. R D Manage 24(2):141–153Google Scholar
  29. Brockhoff K (1993) Technologiemanagement – Das S-Kurven-Konzept. In: Hauschildt J, Grün O (eds) Ergebnisse empirischer betriebswirtschaftlicher Forschung: zu einer Realtheorie der Unternehmung: Festschrift für Eberhard Witte. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart, pp 328–353Google Scholar
  30. Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Adm Sci Q 42(1):1–34Google Scholar
  31. Bulinge F (2006) Le cycle du renseignement: analyse critique d’un model empirique. In: Moinet N, Chirouze Y (eds) L’intelligence économique. Edicions ESK, ParisGoogle Scholar
  32. Burmeister K et al (2002) Zukunftsforschung und Unternehmen – Praxis, Methoden, Perspektiven. Druck- und Verlagskooperative stattwerk e. G, EssenGoogle Scholar
  33. Burt G (2007) Why are we surprised at surprises? Integrating disruption theory and system analysis with the scenario methodology to help identify disruptions and discontinuities. Technol Forecast Soc Change 74(6):731–749Google Scholar
  34. Cairns G et al (2006) Enhancing foresight between multiple agencies: issues in the use of scenario thinking to overcome fragmentation. Futures 38(8):1010–1025Google Scholar
  35. Camerona J et al (2008) ‘The Navigator Network’: a new Zealand futurewatch case study. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 20(3):271–285Google Scholar
  36. Carlson LW (2004) Using technology foresight to create business value. Res Technol Manage 47(5):51–60Google Scholar
  37. Chandy RK, Tellis GJ (1998) Organizing for radical product innovation: the overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize. J Mark Res 35(4):474–487Google Scholar
  38. Chandy RK, Tellis GJ (2000) The incumbent’s curse? incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. J Mark 64(3):1–17Google Scholar
  39. Chermack TJ, Lynham SA, van der Merwe L (2006) Exploring the relationship between scenario planning and perceptions of learning organization characteristics. Futures 38(7):767–777Google Scholar
  40. Chermack TJ, van der Merwe L, Lynham SA (2007) Exploring the relationship between scenario planning and perceptions of strategic conversation quality. Technol Forecast Soc Change 74(3):379–390Google Scholar
  41. Child J (1972) Organizational structure, environment and performance – role of strategic choice. Sociol – J Br Sociol Assoc 6(1):1–22Google Scholar
  42. Child J (1997) Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations and environment: retrospect and prospect. Organ Stud 18(1):43–76Google Scholar
  43. Christensen CM (1997) The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  44. Collis D, Montgomery C (1995) Competing on resources: strategy in the 1990s. Harv Bus Rev 73(4):118–128Google Scholar
  45. Cooper RG (1983) Process model for industrial new product development. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 30(1):2–11Google Scholar
  46. Corner PD, Kinicki AJ, Keats BW (1994) Integrating organizational and individual information-processing perspectives on choice. Organ Sci 5(3):294–308Google Scholar
  47. Costanzo LA (2004) Strategic foresight in a high-speed environment. Futures 36(2):219–235Google Scholar
  48. Cuhls K (2001) Foresight with Delphi surveys in Japan. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 13(4):555–569Google Scholar
  49. Cuhls K (2003) From forecasting to foresight processes – new participative foresight activities in Germany. J Forecast 22(2–3):93–111Google Scholar
  50. Daft RL, Weick KE (1984) Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad Manage Rev 9(2):284–295Google Scholar
  51. Daft RL, Sormunen J, Parks D (1988) Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance – an empirical-study. Strateg Manage J 9(2):123–139Google Scholar
  52. Daheim C, Uerz G (2006) Corporate foresight in Europe: ready for the next step? Second international seville seminar on future-oriented technology analysis: impact of FTA approaches on policy and decision-making. Seville, Spain, 16Google Scholar
  53. Daheim C, Uerz G (2008) Corporate foresight in Europe: from trend based logics to open foresight. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 20(3):321–336Google Scholar
  54. Danneels E (2004) Disruptive technology reconsidered: a critique and research agenda. J Prod Innov Manage 21(4):246–258Google Scholar
  55. Danneels E (2008) Organizational antecedents of second-order competences. Strateg Manage J 29(5):519–543Google Scholar
  56. Davis A (2008) Barrieren bei der Implementierung von Corporate Foresight im Unternehmen und im Strategischen Management Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Institut für Wirtschaftspolitik und Wirtschaftsforschung (IWW). University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, p 245Google Scholar
  57. Day DL (1994) Raising radicals – different processes for championing innovative corporate ventures. Organ Sci 5(2):148–172Google Scholar
  58. Day GS, Schoemaker PJH (2004b) Driving through the fog: managing at the edge. Long Range Plann 37(2):127–142Google Scholar
  59. Day GS, Schoemaker PJH (2006) Peripheral vision: detecting the weak signals that will make or break your company. Harvard Business School, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  60. de Geus AP (1988) Planning as learning. Harv Bus Rev 66(2):70–74Google Scholar
  61. De Geus A (1997a) The living company. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  62. De Geus A (1997b) The living company. Harv Bus Rev 75(2):51–59Google Scholar
  63. Dean JW, Sharfman MP (1996) Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decisionmaking effectiveness. Acad Manage J 39(2):368–396Google Scholar
  64. Dew N, Goldfarb B, Sarasvathy S (2006) Optimal inertia: when organizations should fail ecology and strategy. Jai-Elsevier Ltd, Kidlington, pp 73–99Google Scholar
  65. Donaldson L (1999) The normal science of structural contingency theory. In: Clegg S, Hardy C (eds) Studying organization: theory & method. Sage Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Durand R (2003) Predicting a firm’s forecasting ability: the roles of organizational illusion of control and organizational attention. Strateg Manage J 24(9):821–838Google Scholar
  67. Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2005b) When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Res Policy 34(5):615–639Google Scholar
  68. Dutton JE, Jackson SE (1987) Categorizing strategic issues – links to organizational action. Acad Manage Rev 12(1):76–90Google Scholar
  69. Dutton JE, Ottensmeyer E (1987) Strategic issue management-systems – forms, functions, and contexts. Acad Manage J 12(2):355–365Google Scholar
  70. Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg Manage J 21(10–11):1105–1121Google Scholar
  71. Elenkov DS (1997) Strategic uncertainty and environmental scanning: the case for institutional influences on scanning behavior. Strateg Manage J 18(4):287–302Google Scholar
  72. Eto H (2003) The suitability of technology forecasting/foresight methods for decision systems and strategy – a Japanese view. Technol Forecast Soc Change 70(3):231–249Google Scholar
  73. Ettlie JE, Bridges WP, Okeefe RD (1984) Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Manage Sci 30(6):682–695Google Scholar
  74. Floyd SW, Wooldridge B (1997) Middle management’s strategic influence and organizational performance. J Manage Stud 34(3):465–485Google Scholar
  75. Garcia-Morales VJ, Ruiz-Moreno A, Llorens-Montes FJ (2007) Effects of technology absorptive capacity and technology proactivity on organizational learning, innovation and performance an empirical examination. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 19(4):527–558Google Scholar
  76. Gassmann O, Gaso B (2005) Organisational frameworks for listening post activities. Int J Technol Intell Plann 1(3):241–265Google Scholar
  77. Gemünden HG, Kock A (2009) Bei radikalen Innovationen gelten andere Spielregeln In: Harland PE, Schwarz-Geschka M (eds) Immer eine Idee voraus: Wie innovative Unternehmen Kreativität systematisch nutzen. Harland mediaGoogle Scholar
  78. Gemünden HG, Salomo S, Hölzle K (2007) Role models for radical innovations in times of open innovation. Creativity Innov Manage 16(4):408–421Google Scholar
  79. Georghiou L, Keenan M (2006) Evaluation of national foresight activities: assessing rationale, process and impact. Technol Forecast Soc Change 73(7):761–777Google Scholar
  80. Gersick CJG (1991) Revolutionary change theories – a multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Acad Manage Rev 16(1):10–36Google Scholar
  81. Gerybadze A (1994) Technology forecasting as a process of organisational intelligence. R D Manage 24(2):131–140Google Scholar
  82. Ghemawat P (1991) Market incumbency and technological inertia. Mark Sci 10(2):161–171Google Scholar
  83. Goll I, Rasheed AMA (1997) Rational decision-making and firm performance: the moderating role of environment. Strateg Manage J 18(7):583–591Google Scholar
  84. Gordon TJ, Glenn JC (2003) Futures research methodology. Millennium Project of the American Council of the United Nations University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  85. Govindarajan V, Kopalle PK (2006) The usefulness of measuring disruptiveness of innovations ex post in making ex ante predictions. J Prod Innov Manage 23(1):12–18Google Scholar
  86. Grupp H, Linstone HA (1999) National technology foresight activities around the globe – resurrection and new paradigms. Technol Forecast Soc Change 60(1):85–94Google Scholar
  87. Hambrick DC (1982) Environmental scanning and organizational strategy. Strateg Manage J 3(2):159–174Google Scholar
  88. Harroussi S (2004) Système de veille stratégique basé sur un réseau d’experts: méthodes et outils. Aix-en-Provence: Universität Paul Cézanne, Aix-Marseille III, 246Google Scholar
  89. Harvey E (1968) Technology and the structure of organizations. Am Sociol Rev 33:247–259Google Scholar
  90. Helfat CE (2007a) Dynamic capabilities: understanding strategic change in organizations. Blackwell, Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
  91. Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2003) The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strateg Manage J 24(10):997–1010Google Scholar
  92. Henderson R (1993) Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation – evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. Rand J Econ 24(2):248–270Google Scholar
  93. Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation – the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Adm Sci Q 35(1):9–30Google Scholar
  94. Heraud JA, Cuhls K (1999) Current foresight activities in France, Spain, and Italy. Technol Forecast Soc Change 60(1):55–70Google Scholar
  95. Hergert R (2007) Strategische Früherkennung: Wahrnehmung relevanter Umweltanreize oder wie ticken Unternehmen? Metropolis Verlag, MarburgGoogle Scholar
  96. Herzhoff M (2004) Szenario-Technik in der chemischen Industrie: Untersuchung von Software-Tools am Beispiel einer Studie zum Markt für Flammschutzmittel im Jahr 2010 und der praktischen Bedeutung der Szenario-Technik Fakultät II – Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften. Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, p 240Google Scholar
  97. Hilbert M, Miles I, Othmer J (2009) Foresight tools for participative policy-making in inter-governmental processes in developing countries: lessons learned from the eLAC policy priorities Delphi. Technol Forecast Soc Change 76(7):880–896Google Scholar
  98. Hitt MA, Tyler BB (1991) Strategic decision-models – integrating different perspectives. Strateg Manage J 12(5):327–351Google Scholar
  99. Hitt M, Keats B, DeMarie S (1998) Navigating in the new competitive landscape: building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Acad Manage Exec 12(4):22–42Google Scholar
  100. Horton A (1999) A simple guide to sucessful foresight. Foresight 1:5–9Google Scholar
  101. Hough JR, Ogilvie DT (2005) An empirical test of cognitive style and strategic decision outcomes. J Manage Stud 42(2):417–448Google Scholar
  102. Hough JR, White MA (2003) Environmental dynamism and strategic decision-making rationality: an examination at the decision-level. Strateg Manage J 24(5):481–489Google Scholar
  103. Huy QN, Mintzberg H (2003) The rhythm of change. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 44(4):79Google Scholar
  104. Ireland RD et al (1987) Strategy formulation processes – differences in perceptions of strength and weaknesses indicators and environmental uncertainty by managerial level. Strateg Manage J 8(5):469–485Google Scholar
  105. Jain SC (1984) Environmental scanning in United-States corporations. Long Range Plann 17(2):117–128Google Scholar
  106. Jemison DB (1984) The importance of boundary spanning roles in strategic decision-making. J Manage Stud 21(2):131–152Google Scholar
  107. Jennings D, Lumpkin J (1992) Insights between environmental scanning activities and Porter’s generic strategies: an empirical analysis. J Manage 18(4):791–803Google Scholar
  108. Josse G (2004) Strategische Frühaufklärung in der Touristik: Aufbau eines zielgebietsorientierten Frühaufklärungssystems für Reiseveranstalter. Deutscher Universitäts-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  109. Judge WQ, Douglas TJ (1998) Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: an empirical assessment. J Manage Stud 35(2):241–262Google Scholar
  110. Kameoka A, Yokoo Y, Kuwahara T (2004) A challenge of integrating technology foresight and assessment in industrial strategy development and policymaking. Technol Forecast Soc Change 71(6):579–598Google Scholar
  111. Käslin B (2008) Systematische Früherkennung von Emerging Risks in der Versicherungswirtschaft. Hochschule St. Gallen, St. Gallen, p 277Google Scholar
  112. Kelley D (2009) Adaptation and organizational connectedness in corporate radical innovation programs. J Prod Innov Manage 26(5):487–501Google Scholar
  113. Khandwalla PN (1977) The design of organizations. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  114. Konnola T, Brummer V, Salo A (2007) Diversity in foresight: insights from the fostering of innovation ideas. Technol Forecast Soc Change 74(5):608–626Google Scholar
  115. Krubasik EG (1982) Strategische Waffe. Wirtschaftswoche 26(25):28–33Google Scholar
  116. Krystek U (2007) Strategische Frühaufklärung. Zeitschrift für Controlling & Management 2007(Sonderheft 2):50–58Google Scholar
  117. Krystek U, Müller-Stewens G (1993) Frühaufklärung für Unternehmen: Identifikation und Handhabung zukünftiger Chancen und Bedrohungen. Schäffer-Poeschel, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  118. Krystek U, Müller-Stewens G (1999) Strategische Frühaufklärung. In: Hahn DT, Taylor B (eds) Strategische Unternehmungsplanung — Strategische Unternehmungsführung. Springer, Berlin, pp 497–517Google Scholar
  119. Kuhn TS (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  120. Lackman CL, Saban K, Lanasa JM (2000) Organizing the competitive intelligence function: a benchmarking study. Competitive Intell Rev 11(1):17–27Google Scholar
  121. Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and environment; managing differentiation and integration. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  122. Leifer RP (1997) Organizational and managerial correlates of radical technological innovation. Innov Technol Manage – The Key to Global Leadership 134–137Google Scholar
  123. Levinthal D (1992) Surviving Schumpeterian environments: an evolutionary perspective. Ind Corp Change 1(3):427–443Google Scholar
  124. Lichtenthaler E (2002) Organisation der Technology Intelligence – Eine empirische Untersuchung der Technologiefrühaufklärung in technologieintensiven Grossunternehmen. Verlag Industrielle OrganisationGoogle Scholar
  125. Lichtenthaler U (2009) Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes. Acad Manage J 52(4):822–846Google Scholar
  126. Liebl F (1996) Strategische Frühaufklärung: Trends – issues – stakeholders. Oldenbourg, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  127. Liebl F (2005) Technologie-Frühaufklärung: Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven. In: Albers S, Gassmann O (eds) Handbuch Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement: Strategie Umsetzung – Controlling. Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp 119–136Google Scholar
  128. Loveridge D (2001) Foresight – seven paradoxes. Int J Technol Manage 21(7–8):781–791Google Scholar
  129. Lucas HC, Goh JM (2009) Disruptive technology: how Kodak missed the digital photography revolution. J Strateg Inf Syst 18(1):46–55Google Scholar
  130. Markides C (2006) Disruptive innovation: in need of better theory. J Prod Innov Manage 23(1):19–25Google Scholar
  131. Martin BR (1995) Foresight in science and technology. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 7(2):139–168Google Scholar
  132. May RC, Stewart WH, Sweo R (2000) Environmental scanning behavior in a transitional economy: evidence from Russia. Acad Manage J 43(3):403–427Google Scholar
  133. Mietzner D, Reger G (2005) Advantages and disadvantages of scenario approaches for strategic foresight. Int J Technol Intell Plann 1(2):220–230Google Scholar
  134. Miles I (1999) Foresight and services: closing the gap? Serv Ind J 19(2):1–27Google Scholar
  135. Miller D (1993) The architecture of simplicity. Acad Manage Rev 18(1):116–138Google Scholar
  136. Mintzberg H, Westley F (1992) Cycles of organizational-change. Strateg Manage J 13:39–59Google Scholar
  137. Moore JF (1993) Predators and prey – a new ecology of competition. Harv Bus Rev 71(3):75–86Google Scholar
  138. Müller A (2008) Strategic Foresight – Prozesse strategischer Trend- und Zukunftsforschung in Unternehmen. Universität St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland, p 425Google Scholar
  139. Müller-Stewens G, Müller A (2009) Strategic Foresight – Trend- und Zukunftsforschung als Strategieinstrument. In: Reimer M, Fiege S (eds) Perspektiven des strategischen Controllings. Gabler, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  140. Nick A (2008) Wirksamkeit strategischer Frühaufklärung – Eine empirische Untersuchung Fakultät für Technologie und Management. Berlin, University of Technology, Berlin, p 232Google Scholar
  141. Nieto M, Quevedo P (2005) Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort. Technovation 25(10):1141–1157Google Scholar
  142. Nochur KS, Allen TJ (1992) Do nominated boundary spanners become effective technological gatekeepers? IEEE Trans Eng Manage 39(3):265–269Google Scholar
  143. Noke H, Perrons RK, Hughes M (2008) Strategic dalliances as an enabler for discontinuous innovation in slow clockspeed industries: evidence from the oil and gas industry. R D Manage 38(2):129–139Google Scholar
  144. Nutt PC (2007) Intelligence gathering for decision making. Omega 35(5):604–622Google Scholar
  145. O’Connor GC, DeMartino R (2006) Organizing for radical innovation: an exploratory study of the structural aspects of RI management systems in large established firms. J Prod Innov Manage 23(6):475–497Google Scholar
  146. O’Connor GC, Veryzer RW (2001) The nature of market visioning for technology-based radical innovation. J Prod Innov Manage 18(4):231–246Google Scholar
  147. O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2004) The ambidextrous organisation. Harv Bus Rev 82(4):74–81Google Scholar
  148. O’Reilly CA, Harreld JB, Tushman ML (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: IBM and emerging business opportunities. Calif Manage Rev 51:75–99Google Scholar
  149. OECD (1996) Special issue on governmental technology foresight exercises. STI Rev 17Google Scholar
  150. Oner M, Gol S (2007) Pitfalls in and success factors of corporate foresight projects. Int J Foresight Innov Policy 3(4):447–471Google Scholar
  151. Paap J, Katz R (2004) Anticipating disruptive innovation. Res Technol Manage 47:13–22Google Scholar
  152. Pennings JM (1975) Relevance of structural-contingency model for organizational-effectiveness. Adm Sci Q 20(3):393–410Google Scholar
  153. Penrose ET (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  154. Peterson JW (2002) Leveraging technology foresight to create temporal advantage. Technol Forecast Soc Change 69(5):485–494Google Scholar
  155. Pillkahn U (2007) Trends und Szenarien als Werkzeuge zur Strategieentwicklung: wie Sie die unternehmerische und gesellschaftliche Zukunft planen und gestalten. Publicis Corporate Publ, ErlangenGoogle Scholar
  156. Porter AL et al (2004) Technology futures analysis: toward integration of the field and new methods. Technol Forecast Soc Change 71(3):287–303Google Scholar
  157. Prahalad CK (2004) The blinders of dominant logic. Long Range Plann 37(2):171–179Google Scholar
  158. Raisch S (2008) Balanced structures: designing organizations for profitable growth. Long Range Plann 41(5):483–508Google Scholar
  159. Raisch S et al (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ Sci 20(4):685–695Google Scholar
  160. Reger G (2001a) Technology foresight in companies: from an indicator to a network and process perspective. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 13(4):533–553Google Scholar
  161. Reger G (2006) Technologie-Früherkennung: Organisation und Prozess. In: Gassmann O, Kobe C (eds) Management von Innovation und Risiko. Quantensprünge in der Entwicklung erfolgreich managen. Springer, Berlin, pp 303–330Google Scholar
  162. Reid SE, de Brentani U (2004) The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: a theoretical model. J Prod Innov Manage 21(3):170–184Google Scholar
  163. Renfro WL (1987) Issues management: the evolving corporate role. Futures 19(5):545–554Google Scholar
  164. Rohrbeck R, Döhler M, Arnold H (2009a) Creating growth with externalization of R&D results – the spin-along approach. Glob Bus organ Excell 28(4):44–51Google Scholar
  165. Roll M (2004) Strategische Frühaufklärung: Vorbereitung auf eine ungewisse Zukunft am Beispiel des Luftverkehrs. Dt. Univ.-Verl, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  166. Rollwagen I, Hofmann J, Schneider S (2008) Improving the business impact of foresight. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 20(3):335–347Google Scholar
  167. Romanelli E, Tushman ML (1994) Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium – an empirical-test. Acad Manage J 37(5):1141–1166Google Scholar
  168. Rothwell R (1992) Successful industrial-innovation – critical factors for the 1990s. R D Manage 22(3):221–239Google Scholar
  169. Rothwell R (1994) Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. Int Mark Rev 11(1):7–31Google Scholar
  170. Salo AA (2001) Incentives in technology foresight. Int J Technol Manage 21(7–8):694–710Google Scholar
  171. Salo A, Cuhls K (2003) Preface – technology foresight – past and future. J Forecast 22(2–3):79–82Google Scholar
  172. Salo A, Gustafsson T, Ramanathan R (2003) Multicriteria methods for technology foresight. J Forecast 22(2–3):235–255Google Scholar
  173. Sandström C, Magnusson M, Jörnmark J (2009) Exploring factors influencing incumbents’ response to disruptive innovation. Creativity Innov Manage 18(1):8–15Google Scholar
  174. Sanz-Menendez L, Cabello C, Garcia CE (2001) Understanding technology foresight: the relevance of its S & T policy context. Int J Technol Manage 21(7–8):661–679Google Scholar
  175. Savioz P (2002) Technology Intelligence in technology-based SMEs. ETH Zurich, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  176. Sawyerr OO (1993) Environmental uncertainty and environmental scanning activities of Nigerian manufacturing executives – a comparative-analysis. Strateg Manage J 14(4):287–299Google Scholar
  177. Scapolo F (2005) New horizons and challenges for future-oriented technology analysis—The 2004 EU–US seminar. Technol Forecast Soc Change 72(9):1059–1063Google Scholar
  178. Schoemaker PJH, Heijden CAJMvd (1992) Integrating scenarios into strategic planning at Royal Dutch/Shell. Plann Rev 20(3):41–46Google Scholar
  179. Schreyögg G (1978) Umwelt, Technologie und Organisationsstruktur: eine Analyse des kontingenztheoretischen Ansatzes. Haupt, BernGoogle Scholar
  180. Schwair TM (2001) Inventing the future, not only predicting the future – futures research at Siemens AG, corporate technology. Futures Res Q 17(3):35–41Google Scholar
  181. Schwarz J (2005) Pitfalls in implementing a strategic early warning system. Foresight 7(4):22–30Google Scholar
  182. Schwarz J-O (2007) Assessing future disorders in organizations: implications for diagnosing and treating schizophrenic, depressed or paranoid organizations. Foresight 9(2):15–26Google Scholar
  183. Schwarz JO (2009) Business wargaming: developing foresight within a strategic simulation. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 21(3):291–305Google Scholar
  184. Schwenk CR (1984) Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision making. Strateg Manage J 5:111–128Google Scholar
  185. Shrivastava P, Grant JH (1985) Empirically derived models of strategic decision-making processes. Strateg Manage J 6(2):97–113Google Scholar
  186. Slaughter RA (1998) Futures studies as an intellectual and applied discipline. Am Behav Sci 42(3):372–385Google Scholar
  187. Sood A, Tellis GJ (2005) Technological evolution and radical innovation. J Mark 69(3):152–168Google Scholar
  188. Sorescu AB, Chandy RK, Prabhu JC (2003) Sources and financial consequences of radical innovation: insights from pharmaceuticals. J Mark 67(4):82–102Google Scholar
  189. Specht D, Mieke C, Behrens S (2003) Methoden der Technologiefrühaufklärung. Industriemanagement 19(3):71–74Google Scholar
  190. Stadler C, Hinterhuber HH (2005) Shell, Siemens and DaimlerChrysler: leading change in companies with strong values. Long Range Plann 38(5):467–484Google Scholar
  191. Stevens GA, Burley J (2003) Piloting the rocket of radical innovation. Res Technol Manage 46(2):16–25Google Scholar
  192. Stubbart CI, Knight MB (2006) The case of the disappearing firms: empirical evidence and implications. J Organ Behav 27(1):79–100Google Scholar
  193. Stuckenschneider H, Schwair T (2005) Strategisches Innovations-Management bei Siemens. In: Albers S, Gassmann O (eds) Handbuch Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement – Strategie – Umsetzung – Controlling. Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp 763–780Google Scholar
  194. Talke K (2007) Corporate mindset of innovating firms: influences on new product performance. J Eng Technol Manage 24(1–2):76–91Google Scholar
  195. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manage J 18(7):509–533Google Scholar
  196. Tellis GJ (2006) Disruptive technology or visionary leadership? J Prod Innov Manage 23(1):34–38Google Scholar
  197. Thomas JB, McDaniel RR (1990) Interpreting strategic issues – effects of strategy and the information-processing structure of top management teams. Acad Manage J 33(2):286–306Google Scholar
  198. Thomas JB, Clark SM, Gioia DA (1993) Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance – linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. Acad Manage J 36(2):239–270Google Scholar
  199. Tsoukas H, Shepherd J (2004a) Coping with the future: developing organizational foresightfulness – introduction. Futures 36(2):137–144Google Scholar
  200. Tsoukas H, Shepherd J (2004b) Managing the future: foresight in the knowledge economy. Blackwell, Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
  201. Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Adm Sci Q 31(3):439–465Google Scholar
  202. Tushman ML, Virany B, Romanelli E (1985) Executive succession, strategic reorientations, and organization evolution – the Minicomputer industry as a case in point. Technol Soc 7(2–3):297–313Google Scholar
  203. Tushman ML, Newman WH, Romanelli E (1986) Convergence and upheaval – managing the unsteady pace of organizational evolution. Calif Manage Rev 29(1):29–44Google Scholar
  204. Van Den Bosch F, Volberda H, de Boer M (1999) Coevolution of firm absorptive capactiy and knowledge environment: organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organ Sci 10(5):551–568Google Scholar
  205. Van der Duin PA, den Hartigh E (2007) Linking futures research with management science: improving innovation and strategy processes within companies. From Oracles to Dialogue; Exploring New Ways to Explore the Future, COST A22 Conference, Athens, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  206. Van der Heijden K (2005) Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation. Wiley, Chichester, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  207. Van der Helm R (2007) Ten insolvable dilemmas of participation and why foresight has to deal with them. Foresight 9(3):3–17Google Scholar
  208. Van der Meulen B, Lohnberg A (2001) The use of foresight: institutional constraints and conditions. Int J Technol Manage 21(7–8):680–693Google Scholar
  209. van der Meulen B, de Wilt J, Rutten H (2003) Developing futures for agriculture in the Netherlands: a systematic exploration of the strategic value of foresight. J Forecast 22(2–3):219–233Google Scholar
  210. Volberda HW, Lewin AY (2003) Guest editors’ introduction – co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: from evolution to co-evolution. J Manage Stud 40(8):2111–2136Google Scholar
  211. Vroom V, Jago A (1988) Managing participation: a critical dimension of leadership. Development 7(5):32–42Google Scholar
  212. Vroom VH, Yetton PW (1973) Leadership and decision-making. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  213. Wack P (1985) Scenarios: uncharted waters ahead. Harv Bus Review (Sept-Oct): 73–89Google Scholar
  214. Walter A (1999) Relationship promoters: driving forces for successful customer relationships. Ind Mark Manage 28(5):537–551Google Scholar
  215. Weick KE (1988) Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations. J Manage Stud 25(4):305–317Google Scholar
  216. Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manage J 5(2):171–180Google Scholar
  217. Woodward J (1958) Management and technology. H. M. Stationery Off, LondonGoogle Scholar
  218. Yasai-Ardekani M, Nystrom PC (1996) Designs for environmental scanning systems: tests of a contingency theory. Manage Sci 42(2):187–204Google Scholar
  219. Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manage Rev 27(2):185–203Google Scholar
  220. Zehir C, Ozsahin M (2008) A field research on the relationship between strategic decision-making speed and innovation performance in the case of Turkish large-scale firms. Manage Decis 46(5–6):709–724Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag HD 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department for Innovation and Technology ManagementTU BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations