The Peculiarities of SMEs in Europe and Italy: Technology Transfer Policies

  • Riccardo Gallo
  • Marco Iezzi
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)


This paper aims to review and summarize the theme of technology transfer. Introducing the topic, first of all, the Authors will focus on the peculiarities of Italian small- and medium-sized enterprises. They will begin comparing the productive structure of Italian economy with other countries’; then they will focus on small-sized enterprises and their low innovation and co-operation capabilities. A relevant part of this work will be on the strategic relevance of the technology transfer; finally the authors will describe the role of RIDITT: this acronym stands for Italian Network for Innovation and technology transfer to SMEs.


Technology Transfer Venture Capital Innovation Activity Knowledge Creation Total Factor Productivity Growth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We would like to express our special thank to Marco Calabrò and Giancarlo Fiorito for their suggestions. The views expressed in the article are those of the authors and do not involve the responsibility of the institutions in which they work and, as always, the authors of the work are the only responsible for the content of it.


  1. Alfó M, Trovato G (2006) Credit rationing and the financial structure of Italian small and medium enterprises. J Appl Econ. Universidad de Buenos Aires, 9:167–184Google Scholar
  2. Bank of Italy (2009) Overview Economic Bulletin No. 58, RomeGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro R, Sala-I-Martin X (1997) Technological diffusion, convergence, and growth. J Econ Growth 2:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bozeman B (2000) Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Res Policy 29:627–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cainelli G, De Marchi M, Leoncini R, Poti B (2003) Ricerca e innovazione nelle imprese. In: M. Scarda (ed) Rapporto sul sistema scientifico e tecnologico in Italia. F. Angeli, Milano, pp. 163–174Google Scholar
  6. Castellacci F, Grodal S, Mendonca S, Wibe M (2005) Advances and challenges in innovation studies. J Econ Iss Bucknell University, Lewisburg, US 39:91–121Google Scholar
  7. Cohen W (1995) Empirical studies of innovative activity. In: Stoneman P (ed) Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 182–264Google Scholar
  8. De Marchi M, Poti’ BM, Reale E, Rocchi M, Scarda AM (2000) Il Monitoraggio della scienza e della tecnologia. F. Angeli, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  9. European Communities (2007) European innovation scoreboard 2007: comparative analysis of innovation performance. LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  10. European Communities (2006) European innovation scoreboard 2006: comparative analysis of innovation performance. LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  11. Faber J, Hesen B (2004) Innovation capabilities of European nations: cross-national analyses of patents and sales of product innovations. Res Policy 33:193–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallo R, Mallone M, Zezza V (2008) Trasferimento tecnologico: l’intervento Riditt. In: Oltre lo stato regolatore: scenari e politiche industriali per un’economia globalizzata. A cura di Cesare Pozzi, L’Industria numero speciale 2008, Il Mulino, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  13. Huergo E, Jaumandreu J (2004) how does probability of innovation change with firm age? small business economics. Springer, New York, NY, pp 187–202Google Scholar
  14. Istat (2006) The Italian innovation survey: methodological issues and operational process, Unit for Innovation and R/D statistics, RomeGoogle Scholar
  15. Kingsley G, Bozeman B, Coker K (1996) Technology transfer and absorption: an “R&D value-mapping” approach to evaluation. Res Policy 25: 967–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klette J, Kortum S (2002) Innovating firms and aggregate innovation, Staff Report 300, Federal Reserve Bank of MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  17. Mairesse J, Mohnen P (2002) Accounting for innovation and measuring innovativeness: an illustrative framework and an application. Am Econ Rev, Papers and Proceedings, 92, pp. 226–230Google Scholar
  18. Mayer S, Blaas W (2002) Technology transfer: an opportunity for small open economies. J Tech Transf 27:275–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mortensen P (2007) Innovation Indicators: more than technology? 32 CEIES Seminar, Arhus, Denmark, 5–6 Feb 2007Google Scholar
  20. OECD (2008) Oecd science, technology and industry outlook. Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  21. OECD (2007) Economic survey of Italy 2007. Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  22. Pianta M, Vaona A (2007) innovation and productivity in european industries, economics of innovation and new technology. Taylor and Francis Journals, Oxford, pp 485–499Google Scholar
  23. Porter ME, Van Opstal D (2001) US competitiveness 2001: strengths, vulnerabilities and long-term priorities. Council on Competitiveness, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Samitas A, Kenourgios D (2005) Entrepreneurship, small and medium size business markets and European economic integration. J Policy Model 27:363–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Struys W (2004) The future of the defence firm in small and medium countries. Defence Peace Econ 15:551–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Webster E (2003) Firms’ decisions to innovate and innovation routines, Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series 2003, N.5, University of Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento Ingegneria Chimica Materiali AmbienteUniversità di Roma “Sapienza”RomaItaly
  2. 2.Istituto per la Promozione IndustrialeRomaItaly

Personalised recommendations