Advertisement

The Law of Consumer Demand in Japan: A Macroscopic Microeconomic View

  • Yuji Aruka
Chapter

Abstract

In economics, there have been found few fundamental theories as complying with statistical laws, really examined by observation. Econometrics still clings to a very special structure, patronized with favoritism by the traditional economic theory. In 1990s, Hidenbrand, Grandmont, Grodal and others have tried to formulate consumer demand by a procedure definitely different from the traditional way of using an individualistic utility function. An alternative approach is to make assumptions on the population of the households as a whole – the macroscopic microeconomic approach. If the households’ demand functions are not identical then one needs a certain form of heterogeneity of the population of households. This approach really also requires the empirical tests. The method of nonparametric test on income distribution to estimate covariances on the households spending may be applied. In this article, Japanese Family Expenditure Data is used for estimation. The law of consumer demand is one of the most important topics since a birth of economics. Our statistical economics should, first of all, demand innovation in this area.

Keywords

Covariance Matrix Income Distribution Average Income Consumer Demand Positive Semidefinite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aruka Y (2000) Family expenditure data in Japan, and the law of demand: macroscopic Microeconomic View, Discussion Paper Series, 9. The Institute of Economic Research, Chuo University, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  2. Haerdle W (1990) Applied nonparametric regression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Haerdle W, Stoker T (1989) Investigating smooth multiple regression by the method of average derivatives. J Am Stat Assoc UK 84:986–995Google Scholar
  4. Hildenbrand W (1994) Market demand. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  5. Hildenbrand W, Kneip A (1993) Family expenditure data, heteroscedasticity and the law of demand. Ricerche Economiche 47:137–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lewbel A (1994) An examination of Werner Hildenbrand’s market demand. J Econ Lit 32:1832–1841Google Scholar
  7. Mitjushcin LG, Polterovich WM (1978) Criteria for monotonicity of demand functions. Ekonomka i Matematicheskie Metody 14:122–128 (in Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of CommerceChuo UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations