Market Saturation or Market Concentration: Evidence on Competition Among U.S. Limited Service Franchise Brands

  • Robert E. Stassen
  • Marko Grünhagen
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


This study uses 1997 and 2002 U.S. Economic Census data for sales per establishment measures of performance and examines the effects of market structure and concentration in a cross-sectional analysis of 55 metropolitan areas. The findings challenge traditional perspectives on market concentration, whereas markets with higher concentration ratios based on a brand’s outlets and revenue were found to have significantly lower sales per establishment. Conversely, markets with greater variety of franchised and non-franchised restaurants show above average performance.

The results indicate the existence of an institutional submarket within a broader market of limited-service restaurant types, where evidence for competition exists among only the leading franchised formats, with non-franchised formats exhibiting little or no effects on the overall market’s sales per establishment. Both franchisors and franchisees considering entry into a new geographic market should continue to evaluate traditional measures of sales per store, and if unavailable, examine the concentration or variety of competitors at the brand level to estimate the potential for new establishments.


Market Concentration Geographic Market Franchise System Economic Census Online Directory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bain JS (1968) Industrial organization, 2nd ed. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Conlin M, Kadiyali V (2006) Entry-deterring capacity in the Texas lodging industry. J Econ Manag Strategy 15(1):167–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dant RP, Kaufmann PJ, Paswan AK (1992) Ownership redirection in franchised channels. J Public Policy Market 11(1):33–44Google Scholar
  4. Economic Censuses (1997 and 2002) Accommodation and food services; Table 1: sales size of establishment for the United StatesGoogle Scholar
  5. Economic Censuses (1997 and 2002) Establishment and firm size; Table 3: single unit and multiunit firms for the United StatesGoogle Scholar
  6. Economic Censuses (1997 and 2002) Establishment and firm size; Table 6: concentration by largest firms for the United StatesGoogle Scholar
  7. Economic Censuses (1997 and 2002) Miscellaneous subject series, establishment and firm size: Table 7. Establishments using a trade name authorized by franchisor for the United States and StatesGoogle Scholar
  8. Grünhagen M, Dorsch MJ (2003) Does the franchisor provide value to franchisees? Past, current and future value assessments of two franchisee types. J Small Bus Manag 41(4):366–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ingene CA (1983) Intertype competition: restaurants versus grocery stores. J Retailing 59(3):49–75Google Scholar
  10. Kalnins A (2004) An empirical analysis of territorial encroachment within franchised and company-owned branded chains. Market Sci 23(4):476–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Oxenfeldt AR, Kelly AO (1968–1969) Will successful franchise systems ultimately become wholly-owned chains? J Retailing 44(4):69–83Google Scholar
  12. Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategy. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Stassen RE. Mittelstaedt RA (1995) Territory encroachment in maturing franchise systems. J Market Channels 4(1/2):27–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Technomic Top 100 and Second 100 (2004) Update and analysis of the 100 Largest U.S. chain restaurant companies. Technomic, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. Yahoo Yellow Pages. retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert E. Stassen
    • 1
  • Marko Grünhagen
  1. 1.Walton College of BusinessUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations