Advertisement

The Dutch Energy Transition Approach

  • René Kemp
Chapter

Abstract

The term transition is employed by various scholars and organisations working on sustainable development. The first book containing these terms was the book The Transition to Sustainability. The Politics of Agenda 21 in Europe, edited by Timothy O’Riordan and Heather Voisey, published in 1998. This book was followed by two other books which similar titles: Our Common Journey: A transition toward sustainability by The Board on Sustainable Development of the US National Research Council (NRC 1999) and Sustainable development: The challenge of transition edited by Jurgen Schmandt and C.H. Ward contained contributions from Frances Cairncross, Herman Daly, Stephen Schneider which came out in 2000.

Keywords

Transition Management Sustainable Energy Transition Approach Transition Path Energy Innovation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bergek A, Jacobsson S, Carlsson B, Lindmark S, Rickne A (2008) Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Res Policy 37:407–429Google Scholar
  2. Berkhout F, Smith A, Stirling A (2004) Technological regimes, transition contexts and the environment. In: Elzen B, Geels F, Green K (eds) System innovation and the transition to sustainability: theory evidence and policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 48–75Google Scholar
  3. Dietz F, Brouwer H, Weterings R (2008) Energy transition experiments in the Netherlands. In: van den Bergh J, Bruinsma F (eds) Managing the transition towards renewable energy: theory and practice from local, regional and macro perspectives. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 217–244Google Scholar
  4. Dirven J, Rotmans J, Verkaik A-J (2002) Samenleving in Transitie: een vernieuwend gezichtspunt, essayGoogle Scholar
  5. Energy Innovation Agenda (2008) Government white paper, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  6. EZ ( 2008) Bloemlezing energietransitie, november 2008, Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Den HaagGoogle Scholar
  7. EZ (2009) Energietransitie. Duurzaam doorgaan, Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Den HaagGoogle Scholar
  8. Foxon F, Reed MS, Stringer LC (2009) Governing long-term social–ecological change: what can the adaptive management and transition management approaches learn from each other? Environ Policy Governance 19:3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freeman C, Louçã F (2001) As times goes by. From the industrial revolutions to the information revolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31(8/9):1257–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geels FW (2004) From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory, Res Policy 33(6–7): 897–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geels FW (2005) Technological transitions, a co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  13. Geels FW (2006) Co-evolutionary and multi-level dynamics in transitions: The transformation of aviation systems and the shift from propeller to turbojet (1930–1970). Technovation 26(9):999–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geels FW, Kemp R (2007) Dynamics in socio-technical systems: typology of change processes and contrasting case studies. Technol Soc 29(4):441–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geels FW, Raven RPJM (2007) Socio-cognitive evolution and co-evolution in competing technical trajectories: biogas development in Denmark (1970–2002). Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 14(1):63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geels FW, Schot JW (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy 36(3):399–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Genus A, Coles A-M (2008) Rethinking the multilevel perspective of technological transitions. Res Policy 37(9):1436–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grin J (2006) Reflexive modernization as a governance issue – or: designing and shaping re-structuration. In: Voß JP, Bauknecht D, en Kemp R (eds) Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 57–81Google Scholar
  19. Grin J, Grunwald A (eds) (2000) Vision assessment: shaping technology in the 21st century society. Towards a repertoire for technology assessment. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. Hekkert MP, Suurs RAA, Negro SO, Kuhlmann S, Smits REHM (2007) Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. Technol Forecast Soc Change 74(4):413–432Google Scholar
  21. Hendriks C (2008) On inclusion and network governance: the democratic disconnect of Dutch energy transitions. Public Admin 86(4):1009–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holtz G, Brugnach M, Pahl-Wostl C (2008) Specifying “Regime” – a framework for defining and describing regimes in transition research. Technol Forecast Soc Change 75:623–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoogma R, Kemp R, Schot J, Truffer B (2002) Experimenting for sustainable transport. The approach of strategic niche management. EF&N Spon, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacob K (2007) Comment: management of industrial transformation: potentials and limits from a political science perspective. In: Lehmann-Waffenschmidt M (ed) Innovations towards sustainability. Conditions and consequences. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 95–100Google Scholar
  25. Jacobsson S, Bergek A (2004) Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Ind Corp Change 13(5):815–849Google Scholar
  26. Jacobsson S, Bergek A, Finon D, Lauber V, Mitchell C, Toke D, Verbruggen A (2009) EU renewable energy support policy: faith or facts. Energy Policy 37:2143–2146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kemp R (2009) Eco-innovations and transitions. Economia delle fonti di energia e dell’ambiente (special issue on ‘Heterodox environmental economics’) 52(1):103–124Google Scholar
  28. Kemp R, Loorbach D (2006) Transition management: a reflexive governance approach. In: Voss J-P, Bauknecht D, Kemp R (eds) Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgard, Cheltenham, pp 103–130Google Scholar
  29. Kemp R, Rotmans J (2009) Transitioning Policy: Co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands. Policy Sci 42:303–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kemp R, Loorbach D, Rotmans J (2007a) Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol (special issue on (co)-evolutionary approach to sustainable development) 14:78–91Google Scholar
  31. Kemp R, Loorbach D, Rotmans J (2007b) Assessing the Dutch energy transition policy: how does it deal with dilemmas of managing transitions? J Environ Plann Policy Manage 9:315–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kern F, Howlett M (2009) Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sci 42:391–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Landes D (1969) The unbound Prometheus: technological and industrial development in Western Europe from 1750 to the present. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Loorbach D (2007) Transition management. New mode of governance for sustainable development. International Books, Utrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  35. Markard J, Truffer B (2008) Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework. Res Policy 37(4):596–615Google Scholar
  36. Meadowcroft J (2007) Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. J Environ Policy Plann 9:299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meadowcroft J (2009) What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sci 42(4):323–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mumford L (1934) Technics and civilization. Harcourt Brace and Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. National Research Council (1999) Our common journey: a transition toward sustainability. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Riordan T, Voisey H (1998) The transition to sustainability. The politics of Agenda 21 in Europe. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Rammel C, van der Bergh JCJM (2003) Evolutionary policies for sustainable development: adaptive flexibility and risk minimising. Ecol Econ 47:121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reckwitz A (2002) Toward a theory of social practices; a development in culturalist theorizing. Eur J Soc Theory 5(2):243–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rip A, Kemp R (1996) Towards a theory of socio-technical change, mimeo. University of Twente, EnschedeGoogle Scholar
  44. Rip A, Kemp R (1998) Technological change. In: Rayner S, Malone L (eds) Human choice and climate change, vol 2, Resources and technology. Batelle, Washington, DC, pp 327–399Google Scholar
  45. Rosenberg N (1982) Inside the black box. Technology and economics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Rotmans J (2005) Maatschappelijke innovatie. Tussen droom en werkelijkheid staat complexiteit, oratie EUR (Societal innovation. Between dream and reality stands complexity, inaugural speech Erasmus University Rotterdam)Google Scholar
  47. Rotmans J, Kemp R (2008) Detour ahead. A response to Shove and Walker about the perilous road of transition management. Environ Plann A 40:1006–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rotmans J, Kemp R, van Asselt M, Geels F, Verbong G, Molendijk K (2000) Transities & transitiemanagement. De casus van een emissiearme energievoorziening (Transitions and transition management). The case of an clean energy system, final report of study “Transitions and Transition management” for the 4th National Environmental Policy Plan (NMP-4) of the Netherlands, October 2000. ICIS & MERIT, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  49. Rotmans J, Kemp R, van Asselt M (2001) More evolution than revolution. Transition management in public policy. Foresight 3(1):15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shove E (2004) Sustainability, system innovation and the laundry. In: Elzen B, Geels F, Green K (eds) System innovation and the transition to sustainability: theory evidence and policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 76–94Google Scholar
  51. Shove E, Walker G (2007) CAUTION: transitions ahead! Environ Plann A 39:763–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shove E, Walker G (2008) Transition management and the politics of shape shifting. Environ Plann A 40:1012–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith A, Kern F (2009) The transitions story line in Dutch Environmental Policy. Environ Politics 18(1):78–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith A, Stirling A (2008) Social–ecological resilience and socio-technical transitions: critical issues for sustainability governance. STEPS Centre Working Paper, University of SussexGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith A, Stirling A, Berkhout F (2005) The governance of sustainable sociotechnical transitions. Res Policy 34:1491–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smits R, Kuhlman S (2004) The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. Int J Foresight Innov Policy 1(1/2):4–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spaargaren G (2003) Sustainable consumption: a theoretical and environmental policy perspective. Soc Nat Res 16:687–701Google Scholar
  58. Spaargaren G, Mommaas H, van den Burg S, Maas L, Drissen E, Dagevos H, Bargeman B, Putman L, Nijhuis J, Verbeek D, Sargant E (2007) Duurzamer Leefstijlen en Consumptiepatronen: een theoretisch perspectief voor de analyse van transitieprocessen binnen consumptiedomeinen. Onderzoeksrapport TMB-project, Environmental Policy Group Wageningen Universiteit/Milieu Natuur Planbureau/Tilburg Universiteit Telos/Landbouw Economisch InstituutGoogle Scholar
  59. Staatscourant (2008) Instellingsbesluit van het Regieorgaan Energietransitie Nederland, Staatscourant 25 febr 2008, nr. 39, p.39Google Scholar
  60. Verbong G (2000) De Nederlandse overheid en energietransities: een historisch perspectief, backround report for project “Transities en transitiemanagement”, Eindhoven, NederlandGoogle Scholar
  61. Verbong GPJ, Geels FW (2007) The ongoing energy transition: lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy 35(2):1025–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weterings R (2006) Quick scan koplopersloket. Een evaluatie van werkwijze, output en effecten. Competentie Centrum Transities, UtrechtGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag HD 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • René Kemp
    • 1
  1. 1.UNU-MERIT, ICISMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations