Advertisement

How to Reduce the Rebound Effect?

  • Wolfgang Irrek
Chapter

Abstract

There are different definitions of the rebound effect that depend on the definition of resource efficiency or energy efficiency and on the boundaries drawn (cf., e.g., Hertwich 2005; Schettkat 2009). For the purpose of this paper, the following definition is applied: If the use of an environmentally, socially or economically more efficient good (e.g., an infrastructure that enables an increase in resource efficiency or allows people to save time, or a product or service that is resource-efficient and saves costs of consumers) induces effects that partly or even fully compensate the ecological, social or economic efficiency gains achieved by this good, this can be called a rebound effect. So there is a link between using the good and the side effects observed. In other words, general economic innovation and growth effects should not be called rebound effects following this definition.

Keywords

Energy Efficiency Rebound Effect Efficiency Gain Resource Efficiency Energy Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barker T, Dagoumas A, Rubin J (2009) The macroeconomic rebound effect and the world economy. Energy Efficiency 2:411–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beckenbach F, Briegel R (2009) Innovation, growth and mitigating emission impacts – an agent-based muli level approach. Draft paper for the 2nd International Wuppertal Colloquium on “Sustainable Growth, Resource Productivity and Sustainable Industrial Policy – Recent Findings, New Approaches for Strategies and Policies”, 10–12 September 2009, University of Wuppertal, Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, WuppertalGoogle Scholar
  3. Brot für die Welt, EED [Evangelischer Entwicklungsdienst] and BUND [Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland] (eds) (2008) Zukunftsfähiges Deutschland in einer globalisierten Welt, Ein Anstoß zur gesellschaftlichen Debatte, Eine Studie des Wuppertal Instituts für Klima, Umwelt, Energie, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  4. Dimitropoulos J (2007) Energy productivity improvements and the rebound effect: an overview of the state of knowledge. Energy Policy 35(12):5965–6558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ECEEE [european council for an energy efficient economy](2009) Draft input to the upcoming EU Action Plan for Energy Efficiency, Draft eceee discussion paper, Version: 17 August 2009, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  6. Hertwich EG (2005) Consumption and the rebound effect, an industrial ecology perspective. J Ind Ecol 9(1–2):85–98Google Scholar
  7. IEA [International Energy Agency] (2005) Learning from the critics – the experience with energy efficiency policies and programmes in IEA countries, IEA information paper by Howard Geller (Southwest Energy Efficiency Project) and Sophie Attali (ICE Con-sultants), ParisGoogle Scholar
  8. Irrek W, Kristof K (2008) Ressourceneffizienz: Warum sie verdient, viel schneller umgesetzt zu werden, Wuppertal Paper No. 176, Wuppertal Institute, WuppertalGoogle Scholar
  9. Irrek W, Thomas S (2006) Der EnergieSparFonds für Deutschland, edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung 169, DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
  10. Kromer S (2006) Risk analysis overview, presentation at the California Evaluation Protocols Public Workshop, 28 March 2006. CPUC, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  11. Linz M, Luhmann H-J (2006) Wie der Fortschritt in Energieeffizienz regelmäßig “abprallt”, Bild des Monats, Energie & Management, 1 November 2006, 11Google Scholar
  12. Madlener R, Alcott B (2008) Energy rebound and economic growth: a review of the main issues and research needs. Energy. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2008.10.011 Google Scholar
  13. Pasche M (2002) Technical progress, structural change, and the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 42(3):381–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. PUC [State of California Public Utilities Commission] (2006) California energy efficiency evaluation protocols: technical, methodological, and reporting requirements for evaluation professionals, prepared by The TecMarket Works Team, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  15. Schettkat R (2009) Analyzing rebound effects. Wuppertal Paper No. 177, Wuppertal Institute, WuppertalGoogle Scholar
  16. Sorrell S (2007) The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. UK Energy Research Centre, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. SRC International et al (2001) A European ex-post evaluation guidebook for DSM and EE service programmes, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  18. Thomas S, Boss G (1995) Evaluierung des KesS-Programms der RWE Energie AG. Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen 45(6):372–377Google Scholar
  19. Ürge-Vorsatz D, Novikova A, Sharmina M (2009) Counting good: quantifying co-benefits of improved efficiency in buildings, eceee Summer Study Proceedings “Act! innovate! deliver! reducing energy demand sustainably”. pp 195–195Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag HD 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ruhr West University of Applied Sciences, CampusBottropGermany

Personalised recommendations