Advertisement

Analyzing Rebound Effects

  • Ronald Schettkat
Chapter

Abstract

Improvements in resource efficiency1 are important for sustainable development but only if second round effects, i.e. economic responses to higher resource productivity – so called rebound effects – are not compensating or even overcompensating the potential savings of resources thus made possible. Are efficiency improvements in the use of natural resources the key for a sustainable development, are they the solution to environmental problems, or will rebound effects compensate or even overcompensate potential savings, will they fire back? The attractiveness of efficiency improvements, of technological solutions to environmental problems is obvious since they allow continuing with “business as usual” avoiding other measures which may be perceived as welfare reductions. But if rebound effects are very high, efficiency strategies cannot contribute substantially to sustainable development but may – as some authors argue – be the cause of environmental problems rather than the solution.

Keywords

Final Service Price Elasticity Rebound Effect Efficiency Gain Fuel Efficiency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Appelbaum E, Schettkat R (2001) Are prices unimportant? The changing structure of the industrialized economies. In: Ten Raa T, Schettkat R (eds) The growth of service industries: the paradox of exploding costs and persistent demand. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow K, Bolin B, Costanza R, Dasgupta P, Folke C, Holling C, Jansson B, Levin S, Mäler K, Perrings C, Pimentel D (1995) Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Ecol Econ 15:91–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumol W (2001) Paradox of the services: exploding costs, persistent demand. In: Raa T, Schettkat R (eds) The growth of service industries: the paradox of exploding costs and persistent demand. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker G (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Econ J 75:493–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkhout PHG, Muskens JC, Velthuijsen WJ (2000) Defining the rebound effect. Energy Policy 28:425–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berndt E, Wood D (1975) Technology, prices, and the derived demand for energy. Rev Econ Stat 57(3):259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berndt ER, Wood DO (1979) Engineering and econometric interpretations of energy-capital complementarity. Am Econ Rev 69(3):342–354Google Scholar
  8. Binswanger M (2001) Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? Ecol Econ 36:119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broadstock DC, Hunt LC, Sorrell S (2007) UKERC Review of Evidence from the Rebound Effect – Technical Report 3: Elasticity of substitution studies. UK Energy Research Centre: LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. de Grauwe P, Costa Storti C (2008) Monetary policy and the real economy. In: Schettkat R, Langkau J (eds) Economic policy for Germany and Europe. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 29–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank R (1999) Luxury fever: why money fails to satisfy in an era of excess. Free, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Galbraith JK (1958) The affluent society. Riverside, Boston, pp 152–160Google Scholar
  13. Goldberg PK (1998) The Effects of the Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency Standards. Journal of Industrial Economics 46(4):1–33Google Scholar
  14. Goodwin P (1992) A review of new demand elasticities with special reference to short and long run effects of price changes. J Transport Econ Policy 26(2):155–169Google Scholar
  15. Greene DL (1992) Vehicle use and fuel economy: how big is the “rebound” effect? Energy J 13:117–143Google Scholar
  16. Greene DL, Kahn JR, Gibson RC (1999) Fuel economy rebound effect for U.S. household vehicles. Energy J 20(3):1–31Google Scholar
  17. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1994) Economic growth and the environment. NBER Working Paper No. W4634Google Scholar
  18. Haughton J, Sarkar S (1996) Gasoline tax as a corrective tax: estimates for the United States, 1970–1991. Energy J 17(2):103–126Google Scholar
  19. Jänicke M, Mönch H, Binder M (1997) “Dirty Industries”: patterns of change in industrial countries. Environ Res Econ 9:467–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jevons WS (1865) The coal question: can Britain survive? In: Flux AS (ed) The coal question: an inquiry concerning the progress of the nation, and the probable exhaustion of our coal-mines. Augustus M. Kelley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones CT (1993) Another look at U.S. passenger vehicle use and the “Rebound? effect from improved fuel efficiency”. Energy J 14(4):99–110Google Scholar
  22. Jorgenson DW (1984) The role of energy in productivity growth. Energy J 5(3):11–26Google Scholar
  23. Kaldor N (1967) Causes of the slow rate of economic growth of the United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalwij A, Machin S (2007) Comparative service consumption in six countries. In: Gregory M, Salverda W, Schettkat R (eds) Services and employment. Explaining the U.S.-European gap. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 109–140Google Scholar
  25. Kaufmann RK, Azary-Lee IG (1990) A biophysical analysis of substitution: does substitution save energy in the US forest products industry? Ecological economics: its implications for Forest Management and Research. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Proceedings of a Workshop held in St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  26. Lancaster K (1991) Modern consumption theory. Edward Elgar, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  27. Layard R (2006) Happiness. Lessons from a new science. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller EM (1986) Cross-sectional and time-series biases in factor demand studies: explaining energy-capital complementary. Southern Econ J 52(3):745–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pasinetti L (1993) Structural economic dynamics. A theory of the economic consequences of human learning. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Patterson MG (1996) What is energy efficiency?: concepts, indicators and methodological issues. Energy Policy 24:377–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pickrell D, Schimek P (1999) Growth in Motor Vehicle Ownership and Use: Evidence from the Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey. Journal of Transportation and Statistics 2(1):1–17Google Scholar
  32. Sartori I, Hestnes A (2007) Energy use in the life-cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: a review article. Energy Build 39:249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saunders H (1992) The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth. Energy J 13(4):131–148Google Scholar
  34. Schettkat R, Yocarini L (2006) The shift to services employment: a review of the literature. Struct Change Econ Dynam 17:127–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schimek P (1996) Gasoline and Travel Demand Models Using Time Series and Cross-Section Data from the United States. Transportation Research Record 1558:83–89Google Scholar
  36. Shapiro C, Varian H (1999) Information rules: a strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  37. Small, K., Van Dender, K. (2005) The effect of improved fuel economy on vehicle miles traveled: estimating the rebound effect using U.S. State Date, 1966–2001. UCEI energy policy and economics working paper 014. University of California Energy Institute, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  38. Solow JL (1987) The capital-energy complementary debate revisited. Am Econ Rev 77(4):605–614Google Scholar
  39. Sorrell S (2007) The Rebound Effect: an Assessment of the Evidence for Economywide Energy Savings from Improved Energy Efficiency, London: UK Energy Research CentreGoogle Scholar
  40. Sorrell S, Dimitropoulos J (2007) UKERC review of evidence for the rebound effect. Technical Report 5: energy, productivity and economic growth studies. Working paper UDERC/WP/TPA/2007/013. UK Energy Research Centre, SussexGoogle Scholar
  41. Stigler G, Becker G (1977) De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. Am Econ Rev 67:76–90Google Scholar
  42. West SE (2004) Distributional Effects of Alternative Vehicle Pollution Control Policies. Journal of Public Economics 88 (3-4):735–757Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag HD 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald Schettkat
    • 1
  1. 1.Schumpeter School of Business and EconomicsUniversity of WuppertalWuppertalGermany

Personalised recommendations