Advertisement

Governance and Contested Land Use in the Netherlands

The Case of the Drentsche Aa
  • Severine van Bommel
  • Noelle Aarts
  • Esther Turnhout
  • Niels Roling
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter investigates, theoretically as well as empirically, the way in which initiatives aimed at territorial governance work out in practice. The concept of territorial governance has increasingly received attention in policy plans as well as in the policy science literature. So far, little is known about how espoused shifts towards territorial governance manifest themselves in practice. By analysing the shift in governance in the Drentsche Aa in the Netherlands, this chapter sheds light on what happens when the espoused shift to territorial governance is applied to concrete situations, in which different dilemmas and opposing forces are at play. It shows that territorial governance in the Drentsche Aa area is struggling with tensions between regional multi-actor practices and hierarchical policy practices. We conclude that shifts in governance indeed occurred in this area, but that they manifested themselves in practice as hybrids between area based hierarchy and multi actor initiatives. As such the shifts are not as straightforward and unambiguous as sometimes thought and/or aimed for in literature, but instead their manifestation in practice is complex, ambiguous and context dependent.

Keywords

Policy Process Policy Practice Governance Context Multi Actor Multifunctional Agriculture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arcadis (2002) Nationaal beek- en esdorpenlandschap Drentsche Aa. Beheer-, Inrichtings-, en Ontwikkelingsplan (BIOPLAN). Arcadis, ApeldoornGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker JP, De Vries Y (1983) Natuurbeheer in het Stroomdallandschap Drentsche A. Natura 80:19–28Google Scholar
  3. Bogaert DCM (2004) Natuurbeleid in Vlaanderen – Natuurontwikkeling en draagvlak als vernieuwingen? PhD dissertation. Nijmegen Catholic University, NijmegenGoogle Scholar
  4. Boonstra FG (2004) Laveren tussen regio’s en regels. Verankering van beleidsarrangementen rond plattelandsontwikkeling in Noordwest Friesland, de Graafschap en Zuidwest Salland. PhD dissertation. Nijmegen Catholic University, NijmegenGoogle Scholar
  5. De Bruijn DJA, Kickert WJM, Koppenjan JFM (1993) Inleiding: beleidsnetwerken en overheidsturing. Netwerkmanagement in het openbaar bestuur. In: Koppenjan JFM, de Bruijn JA, Kickert WJM (eds) Over de mogelijkheden van overheidssturing in beleidsnetwerken. VUGA Uitgeverij, ’s-Gravenhage, pp 177–196Google Scholar
  6. Ernst A (1976) Tien jaar Stroomdallandschap Drentsche A (1965–1975). Natuur en Landschap 30:13–17Google Scholar
  7. Glück P (2000) Policy means for ensuring the full value of forests to society. Land Use Policy 17:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hooghe L, Marks G (2001) Multi-level governance and European integration. Rowman and Littlefield, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  9. Ison R, Röling N, Watson D (2007) Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning. Environ Sci Policy 10:499–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jordan A, Wurzel AKW, Zito A (2005) The rise of ‘new’ policy instruments in comparative perspective: has governance eclipsed government? Polit Stud 53:477–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kooiman J (2000) Societal governance: levels, modes, and orders of social-political interaction. In: Pierre J (ed) Debating governance. Authority, steering and democracy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Koppenjan JFM, De Bruijn JA, Kickert WJM (1993) Over de mogelijkheden van overheidssturing in beleidsnetwerken. VUGA Uitgeverij, ’s-GravenhageGoogle Scholar
  13. LNV (1997) Programma Beheer, het beheer van natuur, bos en landschap binnen en buiten de Ecologische Hoofdstructuur. Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij, ’s-GravenhageGoogle Scholar
  14. LNV (2000) Natuur voor mensen, mensen voor natuur: Nota natuur, bos en landschap in de 21e eeuw. Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer, en Visserij, ’s-GravenhageGoogle Scholar
  15. Pierre J (2000) Debating governance. Authority, steering and democracy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Pierre J, Peters BG (2000) Governance, politics, and the state. Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  17. Powell W (1991) Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organisation. In: Thompson G, Frances J, Levavcic R, Mitchell J (eds) Markets and hierarchies and networks: the coordination of social life. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Rhodes R (1997) Understanding governance: policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosenbaum A, Shepherd A (2000) IASIA symposium on governance, responsibility and social enhancement: governance, good government and poverty reduction. Int Rev Admin Sci 66:269–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. State Forest Service (1965) Stroomdallandschap Drentsche A. Beschrijving en gedachtenplan met betrekking tot het beheer en agrarisch gebruik, de landschappelijke-, en recreatieve ontwikkeling. State Forest Service, AssenGoogle Scholar
  21. Teisman GR (1995) Complexe besluitvorming. Een pluricentrisch perspektief op besluitvorming over ruimtelijke investeringen. VUGA Uitgeverij BV,’s GravenhageGoogle Scholar
  22. Turnhout E, Van der Zouwen M (2011) ‘Governance without governance’: how nature policy was democratized in the Netherlands. Under review at Critical Policy Analysis (in preparation)Google Scholar
  23. Van Bommel S (2008) Understanding experts and expertise in different governance contexts. The case of nature conservation in the Drentsche Aa area in the Netherlands. PhD Dissertation. Wageningen University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Bommel S, Röling N (2004) The Drentsche Aa area in the Netherlands. SLIM Case Study Monograph. Open University, Milton KeynesGoogle Scholar
  25. Van der Zouwen M (2006) Nature policy between trends and traditions. Dynamics in nature policy arrangements in the Yorkshire Dales, Doñana and the Veluwe. PhD Dissertation. Catholic University Nijmegen, NijmegenGoogle Scholar
  26. Van der Zouwen M, Van Tatenhove JPM (2001) Implementatie van Europees natuurbeleid in Nederland. Planbureaustudies Natuurplanbureau, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Kersbergen K, Van Waarden F (2001) Shifts in governance: problems of legitimacy and accountability. NWO Social Science Research Council, ‘s GravenhageGoogle Scholar
  28. Verbeeck B, Leroy P (2006) A target group approach in Flemish environmental policy: establishing new government-industry relations? In: Leroy P, Arts B (eds) Institutional dynamics in environmental governance. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  29. VROM, LNV (1995) Het landelijk gebied de moeite waard: Structuurschema groene ruimte deel 4, de planologische kernbeslissing. Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij, ’s-GravenhageGoogle Scholar
  30. Wettenhall R (2003) The rhetoric and reality of public-private partnerships. Public Org Rev 3:77–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Williamson O (1988) Corporate finance and corporate governance. J Fin 43:567–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Severine van Bommel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Noelle Aarts
    • 1
  • Esther Turnhout
    • 2
  • Niels Roling
    • 1
  1. 1.Communication Science GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenNetherlands
  2. 2.Forest and Nature Conservation Policy GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenNetherlands

Personalised recommendations