Governance, Rural Development and Farmers’ Participation in Irish Local Food Movements

  • Áine Macken-Walsh


As exponents of the “post-industrial” and “post-productivist” economy, it is accepted that many of the economic activities in line with the contemporary rural development agenda (as supported by the EU LEADER programme, for example) do not have a mainstream agriculture “tag”. It is envisaged that the governance approach to rural development, by providing a mechanism for the participation of a variety of local sectoral stakeholders, gives rise to an increased capacity to appraise and tap into nuanced local development resources. Particular forms of economic activity, which concentrate to a large extent on high value-added food production, tourism activities and the valorisation of natural resources have emerged in line with the contemporary rural development agenda and arguably represent a new status quo in the rural economy. In the bureaucratic and academic literatures, the “newness” of what is described as the knowledge-based culture economy continues to be emphasised, as if in reflection of the persisting challenges that arise in the transition from “labour and material value to design value”. This paper presents an Irish case-study to explore the socio-cultural factors that frame “conventional” farmers’ engagement in “alternative” local food movements, which have gained prominence within the context of the contemporary rural development agenda.


Rural Development Local Food Cultural Capital Farm Household Rural Economy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Barnett C (1998) Cultural twists and turns: environment and planning. Society Space 16:631–634Google Scholar
  2. Bogue P (2006) Farming post decoupling – A Co. Clare survey. A research survey of the opinions of farm families in Co. Clare rural resource development (RRD) Ltd. Co. Clare, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourdieu P (1993) The field of cultural production. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu P (1996) Three forms of capital. In: Richardson JG (ed) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyle GE (2008) Opening address at the Teagasc national rural development conference, Galway, 22 Feb 2008. Teagasc, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  6. Burton RJF (2004a) Reconceptualising the ‘behavioural approach’ in agricultural studies: a socio-psychological perspective. J Rural Stud 20:359–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burton RJF (2004b) Seeing through the ‘good farmer’s’ eyes: towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of ‘productivist’ behaviour. Sociol Ruralis 44(2):195–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burton RJF, Wilson GA (2006) Injecting social psychology theory into conceptualisations of agricultural agency: towards a post-productionist farmer self-identity. J Rural Stud 22:95–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burton RJF, Kuczera C, Schwarz G (2008) Exploring farmers’ cultural resistance to voluntary agri-environmental schemes. Sociol Ruralis 48(1):16–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cawley M, Gillmor D (2008) ‘Culture economy’, ‘integrated tourism’ and ‘sustainable rural development’: evidence from Western Ireland in Robinson. In: Robinson GM (ed) Sustainable rural systems: sustainable agriculture and rural communities. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  11. CEC (1988) The future of rural society. Directorate General for AgricultureGoogle Scholar
  12. Clare County Library (2000) Social, economic and cultural profile of Co. Clare. Clare County Council.
  13. Clear C (2008) Social change and everyday life in Ireland: 1850–1922. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  14. Cloke P, Marsden T, Mooney PH (2006) Handbook of rural studies. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  15. Conway A (1991) Developing the ‘rural economy’. In: Reynolds B, Healy SJ (eds) Rural development policy: what future for rural Ireland? Conference of major religious superiours (Ireland), the Justice Commission, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  16. CORASON (2009) Project Briefing Paper. Accessed 19 May 2009
  17. Curtin C, Varley T (1997) Take your partners and face the music; the state, community groups and area-based partnerships in rural Ireland. In: Paul Brennan (ed) L’Irlande, Identités et Modernité. Centre de Gestion des Revues, Université Charles de Gaulle, FranceGoogle Scholar
  18. Fonte M (2008) Knowledge, food and place: a way of producing, a way of knowing. Sociol Ruralis 48(3):200–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garcia-Ramon MD, Canoves G, Valdovinos N (1995) Farm tourism, gender, and the environment in Spain. Ann Tour Res 22(2):267–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gubrium J, Holstein J (1995) The active interview. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  21. Gubrium J, Holstein J (eds) (2001) Handbook of interview research. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Haugen MS, Vik J (2008) Farmers as entrepreneurs: the case of farm-based tourism. Int J Entrepreneurship Small Bus 6(3):321–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kearney B, Boyle GE, Walsh JA (1995) EU LEADER 1 initiative in Ireland. Evaluations and recommendations. Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry, Agriculture House, Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  24. Kovach I, Kucerova E (2006) The project class in Central Europe: the Czech and Hungarian cases. Sociol Ruralis 46:3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. LEADER European Observatory (1997) Organising local partnerships: innovation in rural areas, Notebook no.2. Leader European Observatory, Brussels.
  26. Lowe P, Ray C, Ward N, Wood D, Woodward R (1998) Participation in rural development: a review of European experience, Research Report. Centre for Rural Economy (CRE), University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK. ISBN 1-898655-44-8Google Scholar
  27. Macken-Walsh A (2009) ‘Barriers to change’: a sociological study of rural development in Ireland, Teagasc National Report. Teagasc Rural Economy Research Centre (RERC), Ireland. ISBN 1-84170-542-XGoogle Scholar
  28. Moseley M (2003b) Rural development, principles and practice. Sage, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Brien M, Hennessy T (2008) An examination of the contribution of off-farm income to the viability and sustainability of farm households and the productivity of farm businesses. Teagasc End of Project Report (RMIS 5490). Teagasc Rural Economy Research Centre (RERC), IrelandGoogle Scholar
  30. Osti G (2000) Leader and partnerships: the case of Italy. Sociol Ruralis 40(2):172–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pobal (2009) The smallholders’ initiative. IrelandGoogle Scholar
  32. Pratt C (2004) The cultural economy. Int J Cult Stud 7(1):117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ray C (1999) Endogenous development in the era of reflexive modernity. J Rural Stud 15(3):257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ray C (2000) Endogenous socio-economic development and trustful relationships: partnerships, social capital and individual agency. Centre for Rural Economy Working Paper no. 45, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UKGoogle Scholar
  35. Share P, Tovey H, Corcoran MP (2006) A sociology of Ireland. Gill & Macmillan, DublinGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharpley R, Vass A (2006) Tourism, farming and diversification: an attitudinal study. Tour Manag 27(5):1040–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Strauss A (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research – grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage, USAGoogle Scholar
  39. Teagasc (2005) Internal Communication of Teagasc Rural Development Commodity Group, November 2005. Teagasc, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  40. Tovey H (2006) New movement in old places? The alternative food movement in rural Ireland. In: Connolly L, Hourigan N (eds) Social movements and Ireland. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  41. Valentine G (1999) Eating in home, consumption and identity. Sociol Rev 47(3):491–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vanclay F (2004) Social principles for agricultural extension to assist in the promotion of natural resource management. Aust J Exp Agric 44(3):213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wengraf T (2001) Qualitative interviewing: biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teagasc Rural Economy Research Centre (RERC)Athenry Mellow’s Campus, Athenry, Co.GalwayIreland

Personalised recommendations