Graphical Chain Models and their Application

  • Iris Pigeot
  • Stephan Klasen
  • Ronja Foraita


Graphical models are a powerful tool to analyze multivariate data sets that allow to reveal direct and indirect relationships and to visualize the association structure in a graph. As with any statistical analysis, however, the obtained results partly reflect the uncertainty being inherent in any type of data and depend on the selected variables to be included in the analysis, the coding of these variables and the selection strategy used to fit the graphical models to the data. This paper suggests that these issues may be even more crucial for graphical models than for simple regression analyses due to the large number of variables considered which means that a fitted graphical model has to be interpreted with caution. Sensitivity analyses might be recommended to assess the stability of the obtained results. This will be illustrated using a data set on undernutrition in Benin.


Graphical Model Markov Property House Quality Association Structure Graphical Chain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blauth, A., Pigeot, I. & Bry, F. (2000). Interactive analysis of high–dimensional association structures with graphical models, Metrika 51: 53–65.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caputo, A., Foraita, R., Klasen, S. & Pigeot, I. (2003). Undernutrition in Benin - An analysis based on graphical models, Social Science & Medicine 56: 1677–1697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cox, D. R. & Wermuth, N. (1993). Linear dependencies represented by chain graphs (with discussion), Statistical Science 8: 204–283.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Cox, D. R. & Wermuth, N. (1994). Tests of linearity, multivariate normality and the adequacy of linear scores, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C (Applied Statistics) 43: 347–355.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox, D. R. & Wermuth, N. (1996). Multivariate Dependencies, Chapman & Hall, London.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Edwards, D. (2000). Introduction to Graphical Modelling, 2 edn, Springer, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Foraita, R., Klasen, S. & Pigeot, I. (2008). Using graphical chain models to analyze differences in structural correlates of undernutrition in Benin and Bangladesh, Economics and Human Biology 6: 398—-419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foraita, R. & Sobotka, F. (2008). gmvalid: Validation of graphical models. R package version 1.2.Google Scholar
  9. Friedman, N., Goldszmidt, M. & Wyner, A. (1999a). Data analysis with bayesian networks: a bootstrap approach.Google Scholar
  10. Friedman, N., Goldszmidt, M. & Wyner, A. (1999b). On the application of the bootstrap for computing confidence measures on features of induced bayesian networks.Google Scholar
  11. Frydenberg, M. (1990). The chain graph markov property, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 17: 333–353.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Gorstein, J., Sullivan, K., Yip, R., de Onis, M., Trowbridge, F., Fajans, P. & Clugston, G. (1994). Issues in the assessment of nutritional status using anthropometry., Bull World Health Organ 72: 273–283.Google Scholar
  13. Green, P. J., Hjort, N. L. & Richardson, S. (eds) (2003). Highly Structured Stochastic Systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford.MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Klasen, S. (2003). Malnourished and surviving in South Asia, better nourished and dying young in Africa: what can explain this puzzle?, Measurement and Assessment of Food Deprivation and Undernutrition, FAO, Rome, pp. 283–287.Google Scholar
  15. Klasen, S. (2008). Poverty, undernutrition, and child mortality: Some inter-regional puzzles and their implications for research and policy, Journal of Economic Inequality 6: 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lauritzen, S. L. (1996). Graphical Models., Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. Lauritzen, S. L. & Wermuth, N. (1989). Graphical models for associations between variables, some of which are qualitative and some quantitative, Annals of Statistics 17: 31–57.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Macro (1996). MEASURE DHS datasets Bangladesh, Benin., last accessed: 10. Aug 2009.
  19. Steck, H. & Jaakkola, T. S. (2004). Bias-corrected bootstrap and model uncertainty, in S. Thrun, L. Saul & B. Schölkopf (eds), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  20. UNICEF (1998). The State of the World’s Children: Focus on Nutrition., UNICEF, New York.Google Scholar
  21. WHO (1995). Physical status: The use and interpretation of anthropometry, WHO Technical Report Series 854, WHO, Geneva.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bremen Institute for Prevention Research and Social Medicine (BIPS)University of BremenBremenGermany
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations