A Note on the Relationship between Two Approaches to Optimal Design under Correlation

Conference paper
Part of the Contributions to Statistics book series (CONTRIB.STAT.)


The note demonstrates the relationship between two recently developed methods for characterizing optimal designs, when the errors/observations in the experiments are correlated according to a given correlation structure. The understanding of this relationship can help to improve the applicability of the methods by providing new frameworks for their tuning parameters.


Optimal Design Information Matrix Design Measure Correlate Error Information Matrice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



We are grateful to two anonymous referees, whose comments helped to improve our paper, particularly our English.


  1. Fedorov, V. (1996). Design of spatial experiments: Model fitting and prediction. In S. Gosh and C. R. Rao (Eds.), Handbook of Statistics 13, 515–553. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Fedorov, V. and W. Möller (2007). Optimum design for correlated fields via covariance kernel expansions. In J. López-Fidalgo, J. M. Rodríguez-Díaz, and B. Torsney (Eds.), mODa 8 - Advances in Model-Oriented Design, 57–66. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Möller, W. G. (2007). Collecting Spatial Data: Optimum Design of Experiments for Random Fields, 3rd ed. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. Möller, W. G. and A. Pázman (2003). Measures for designs in experiments with correlated errors. Biometrika 90, 423–434.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Möller, W. G. and L. Pronzato (2009). Towards an optimal design equivalence theorem for random fields? (Submitted).Google Scholar
  6. Pázman, A. and J. Laca (2008). Modifications and extensions of the method of virtual noise in correlated experimental design. Tatra Mountains Mathematical Publications 39, 125–133.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Pázman, A. and W. G. Möller (1998). A new interpretation of design measures. In A. C. Atkinson, L. Pronzato, and H. P. Wynn (Eds.), MODA 5 - Advances in Model-Oriented Data Analysis and Experimental Design, 239–246. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Pázman, A. and W. G. Möller (2001). Optimal design of experiments subject to correlated errors. Statistics & Probability Letters 52, 29–34.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Rao, C. R. (2001). Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Santner, T. J., B. J. Williams, and W. Notz (2003). The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. New York: Springer-Verlag.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Comenius UniversityBratislavaSlovakia
  2. 2.Dept. of Applied StatisticsJohannes-Kepler-UniversityLinzAustria

Personalised recommendations