Impact of Stratified Randomization in Clinical Trials

  • Vladimir V. Anisimov
Conference paper
Part of the Contributions to Statistics book series (CONTRIB.STAT.)


This paper deals with the analysis of randomization effects in clinical trials.The two randomization schemes most often used are considered: unstratified and stratified block-permuted randomization. A new analytic approach using a Poisson-gamma patient recruitment model and its further extensions is proposed. The prediction of the number of patients randomized in different strata to different treatment arms is considered. In the case of two treatments, the properties of the total imbalance in the number of patients on treatment arms caused by using stratified randomization are investigated and for a large number of strata a normal approximation of imbalance is proved. The impact of imbalance on the power of the trial is considered. It is shown that the loss of statistical power is practically negligible and can be compensated by a minor increase in sample size. The influence of patient dropout is also investigated.


Poisson Process Sample Size Increase Multicentre Clinical Trial Randomization Scheme Incomplete Block 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anisimov, V. V. (2007). Effect of imbalance in using stratified block randomization in clinical trials. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute - LXII, Proc. of the 56 Annual Session, Lisbon, 5938–5941.Google Scholar
  2. Anisimov, V. V. and V. V. Fedorov (2006). Design of multicentre clinical trials with random enrolment. In Advances in Statistical Methods for the Health Sciences (N. Balakrishnan, J. L. Auget, M. Mesbah, and G. Molenberghs eds). Berlin: Birkhäuser, 387–400.Google Scholar
  3. Anisimov, V. V. and V. V. Fedorov (2007). Modeling, prediction and adaptive adjustment of recruitment in multicentre trials. Statistics in Medicine 26, 4958–4975.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Hallstrom, A. and K. Davis (1988). Imbalance in treatment assignments in stratified blocked randomization. Controlled Clinical Trials 9, 375–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lachin, J. M. (1988). Statistical properties of randomization in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 9, 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Matts, J. P. and J. M. Lachin (1988). Properties of permuted-block randomization in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 9, 327–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pocock, S. J. (1983). Clinical Trials. A Practical Approach. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Rosenberger, W. F. and J. M. Lachin (2002). Randomization in Clinical Trials. New York: Wiley.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Statistics UnitGlaxoSmithKline, New Frontiers Science Park (South)EssexUK

Personalised recommendations