Skip to main content

Reshaping eGovernment Through Institutional Agents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Management of the Interconnected World

Abstract

The eGovernment stage is being populated by a cast of intermediary actors from both the private and the not-for-profit sectors, as a result of the multichannel strategies with which many countries are seeking to give new impulse to their eGovernment plans. This paper claims that a fuller understanding of these players’ role is crucial in developing socially-aware eGovernment policies and suggests the usefulness of adopting an institutional perspective to place the intermediaries in an adequate frame of reference. In particular, it suggests that it might be fruitful to slot the intermediaries into the “institutional agent” category. Some implications ensuing from this study are proposed and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Frissen V, Millard J, Huijboom N (2007) The future of eGovernment, Seville

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burt B, Taylor J (2003) Constructing new ways of living together: government relationships with the voluntary sector in the information polity. Inf Polity 8:181–192

    Google Scholar 

  3. European i2010 initiative (2007) To be part of the information society, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  4. OECD (2004) The e-Government imperative. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  5. Scott WR (1998) Organizations. Rational, natural and open systems. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zinnbauer D (2007) What can social capital and ICT do for inclusion. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Seville

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pasic A, Sassen AM, Garcia A (2004)e-Government Intermediation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3183: 88-92

    Google Scholar 

  8. e-Envoy (2003) Policy framework for a mixed economy in the supply of e-Government services. Implementation Guidelines 1 London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hill R, Beynon-Davies P, Williams MD (2008) Older people and internet engagement. Inf Technol People 21(3):244–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liou KT:(2008) E-Government development and China’s administrative reform. Int J Public Adm 31(1):76–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lowe C (2003) Ten steps to massive take-up of eGovernment in Europe. Int J Commun Law Policy 8:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rajalekshmi K (2007) E-Governance services through telecenters: the role of human intermediary and issues of trust. Inf Technol Int Dev 4(1):19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De', R (2006) E-Government systems in developing countries: issues and concerns. IIMB Manage Rev 18(4):277–288

    Google Scholar 

  14. Millard J (2006) User attitudes to e-government citizen services in Europe. Int J Electronic Gov Res 2(2):49–58

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ebbers WE, Pieterson WJ, Noordman HN (2008) Electronic government: rethinking channel management strategies. Gov Inf Q 25(2):181–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gibson A, Bertot JC, McLure C (2009) Emerging role of public librarians as e-Government providers. In: HICSS-42 Hawaii international conference on systems science, Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

  17. Akesson M, Skalén P, Edvardsson B (2008) E-Government and service orientation: gaps between theory and practice. Int J Public Sector Manage 21(1):74–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Millard J (2006) eGovernance and eParticipation: lessons from Europe in promoting inclusion and empowerment, Citeseer

    Google Scholar 

  19. Klecun E (2008) Bringing lost sheep into the fold: questioning the discourse of the digital divide. Inf Technol People 21(3):267–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. IPTS (2006) Towards the eGovernment Vision for the EU in 2010: research policy challenges. European Commission Directorate General

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scott WR (2008) Lords of the dance: professionals as institutional agents. Organ Stud 29(2):219–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Scott WR (2003) Institutional carriers: reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences. Ind Corp Change 12(4):879–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Warner ME, Hefetz A (2008) Managing markets for public service: the role of mixed public-private delivery of city services. Public Adm Rev 68(1):155–166

    Google Scholar 

  24. Avgerou C, Ciborra C, Cordella A, Kallinikos J (2006) e-Government and trust in the state: lessons from electronic tax systems in Chile and Brazil, LSE, pp 1–38

    Google Scholar 

  25. Carter L, Weerakkody V (2008) E-government adoption: a cultural comparison. Inf Syst Front 10(4):473–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bekkers V (2007) The governance of back-office integration. Public Manage Rev 9(3):388–400

    Google Scholar 

  27. Grimsley M, Meehan A (2007) e-Government information systems: evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. Eur J Inf Syst 16(2):134–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maddalena Sorrentino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sorrentino, M., Solari, L. (2010). Reshaping eGovernment Through Institutional Agents. In: D'Atri, A., De Marco, M., Braccini, A., Cabiddu, F. (eds) Management of the Interconnected World. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2404-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics