Skip to main content

Transferring FAME, a Methodology for Assessing Open Source Solutions, from University to SMEs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Management of the Interconnected World

Abstract

We present FAME (Filter, Analyze, Measure and Evaluate), a simplified approach for Open Source software assessment. This approach has been derived by more heavyweight, proven approaches developed in a University research environment, to match the needs of small organizations. The proposed approach has been developed by CC-ICT-SUD, a consortium for the delivery of technology transfer services, and for transferring advanced methodologies for software evaluation and assessment from academic to industrial contexts, in particular for Small and Medium Enterprises (SME). The FAME methodology is briefly described, and a case study involving the choice of a document management system for a SME is presented, showing how the approach can be used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam S, Lakhani K (2005) Perspectives on free and open source software. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  2. FLOSS (2003) Free/Libre and open source software: survey and study: final report. Available at: http://FLOSS.infonomics.nl

  3. Senyard A, Michlmayr M (2004) How to have a successful free software project. In: APSEC, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp 84–91

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michlmayr M (2005) Software process maturity and the success of free software projects. In: Zielinski K, Szmuc T (eds) Software engineering: evolution and emerging technologies. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crowston K, Annabi H, Howison J (2003) Defining open source soft ware project success. In: ICIS, Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, pp 327–340

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crowston K, Annabi H, Howison J, Masango C (2004) Towards a portfolio of floss project success measures. Open Source Workshop of the International Conference on Software Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  7. QUALOSS (2008) http://www.qualoss.org

  8. FLOSSMetrics (2008) http://flossmetrics.org

  9. SQO-OSS (2008) http://www.sqo-oss.eu

  10. QUALIPSO (2008) http://www.qualipso.org

  11. Cau A, Concas G, Marchesi M (2006) Extending OpenBRR with automated metrics to measure object oriented open source project success. The workshop on evaluation frameworks for OSS, collocated in the second international conference on OSS2006

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ciolkowski M, Soto M (2008) Towards a comprehensive approach for assessing open source projects. In: Dumke RR et al (eds) Proceedings of the international conferences on software process and product measurement. Munich, Germany, November 18–19. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5338. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 316–330

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deprez, JC, Alexandre S (2008) Comparing assessment methodologies for free/open source software: OpenBRR and QSOS. Lecture notes in computer science, Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mannaro, K Concas G, Marchesi M (2006) NVAF: un Framework per una valutazione di tipo comparativo delle soluzioni software nelle Pubbliche Amministrazioni. Esperta 2006, Como, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cau A (2007) EFFLOSS: an evaluation framework for Free/Libre Open Source. PhD Thesis

    Google Scholar 

  16. Business Readiness Rating (2005) A proposed open standard to facilitate assessment and adoption of open source software. http://www.openbrr.org

  17. Golden B (2004) Succeeding with open source. Addison-Wesley Information Technology Series, Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  18. Open Source Maturity Model (2000) Published on: http://www.seriouslyopen.org

  19. QSOS (2006) Method for Qualification and Selection of Open Source software (QSOS) version 1.6 Atos Origin, April 2006. http://qsos.org

  20. Jones C (2000) Software assessments, benchmarks, and best practices. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  21. Basili V (1995) Applying the Goal/question/metric Paradigm in the Experience Factory. Software quality assurance and measurement: a worldwide perspective, Chapter 2. International Thomson Computer Press, London, pp 21–44

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

CC - ICT-SUD funded this technology transfer experience.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filippo E. Pani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pani, F.E., Sanna, D., Marchesi, M., Concas, G. (2010). Transferring FAME, a Methodology for Assessing Open Source Solutions, from University to SMEs. In: D'Atri, A., De Marco, M., Braccini, A., Cabiddu, F. (eds) Management of the Interconnected World. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2404-9_57

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics