The Cross-Level Antecedents of Dynamic Capabilities Development: The Case of Network Exploitation Capability
This study will conceptualize antecedents of dynamic capabilities at the individual and organizational level. My focus is on network exploitation capability, defined as the ability of an organization to effectively “orchestrate” the combination of traditional and technology-enabled distribution channels for its product or service. My analysis has allowed me to reach four main results: (1) to distinguish individual antecedents from the organizational ones; (2) to list the individual and organizational antecedents in terms of sensing, seizing and reconfiguring; (3) to underscore the existing relationship between individual and organizational antecedents; to provide a small theoretical contribution to the literature concerning dynamic capabilities1.
KeywordsBusiness Model Distribution Channel Dynamic Capability Tangible Asset Business Experience
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
I’m grateful to Gabriele Piccoli for his helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
- 3.Nelson RR, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 4.Felin T, Hesterly WS (2006) The knowledge-based view, heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Acad Manage Rev 32(1): 195–218Google Scholar
- 9.Wade M, Hulland J (2004) The resource-based view and information system research: review, extension and suggestions for future research. MIS Q 28(1):107–142Google Scholar
- 10.Bhatt GD, Grover V (2005) Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: an empirical study. J Manage Inf Syst 22(2):253–277Google Scholar
- 11.Winter SG (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities.Strateg Manage J October Special Issue 24:991–996Google Scholar
- 13.Piccoli G, Ives B (2005) Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: a review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Q 29(4): 747–776Google Scholar
- 14.Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj AS, Grover V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of IT in contemporary firms.MIS Q 27(2):237–263Google Scholar
- 15.Pavlou PA, El Sawy O (2006) The nature and role of dynamic capabilities: conceptualization and measurement. Working paper, Anderson School of Management, University of California, RiversideGoogle Scholar
- 18.Ross JW, Beath CM, Goodhue D (1996) Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Manage Rev 38(1):31–45Google Scholar
- 20.Bassellier G, Homer B, Benbasat I (2001) Information technology competence of business managers: a definition and research model.J Manage Inf Syst 17(4):159–182Google Scholar
- 25.Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. WH. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar