Advertisement

The Role of ICT in Clinical Risk Management: First Evidence from an Italian Experience

  • Gustavo Barresi
  • Carmelo Marisca
Conference paper

Abstract

Clinical risk management may be considered as a set of actions with the aim of raising performance and health-care safety, through error learning. Most studies carried out and guidelines introduced give ample scope, to information and communication technology in clinical risk management. The assumption, in this case, is that human errors are an inevitable component in real life. Although this component can never be totally eliminated, the risk of error can be greatly reduced, if precise codes of behavior, shared by all health-care workers, are backed-up by suitable information and technological support. With all of the above in mind, referring to the case in hand, we will try to pinpoint critical points associated with computerization of procedures and introduction of new technological instruments to manage clinical risk in a health-care institution, and how they should be dealt with. In particular, we will try to identify the key factors in related organizational change.

Keywords

Organizational Procedure Active Failure Error Learning Ample Scope Clinical Risk Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tartaglia R, Bagnara S, Bellandi T, Albolino S (2005) Healthcare systems ergonomics and patient safety. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Helmereich R (2000) On error management: lessons from aviation. Br Med J 320:781–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reason J (2000) Human error: models and management. Br Med J 320:768–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brusoni M, Trinchero E (2008) Soluzioni aziendali e competenze emergenti per la ge-stione del rischio e della sicurezza. In Anessi Pessina E, Cantù E (eds) Rapporto OASI 2008 – l'aziendalizzazione della sanità in Italia. Egea, Milan, pp 421–440Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daft LR (2004) Organizzazione aziendale. Apogeo, MilanGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Italian Ministry for Public Health (2007) Raccomandazione per la prevenzione della reazione trasfusionale da incompatibilità AB0, Italian Ministry for Public Health, RomeGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Italian Ministry for Public Health (2008) Protocollo per il Monitoraggio degli Eventi Sentinella, Italian Ministry for Public Health, RomeGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anessi Pessina E, Cantù E (2005) L’aziendalizzazione della sanità in Italia. Rapporto OASI 2005. Egea, MilanGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brusoni M, Cosmi L, Trinchero E (2006) Prospettive regionali per la gestione del rischio clinico: una prima indagine esplorativa. In Anessi Pessina E, Cantù E (eds) Rapporto OASI 2006 – L'aziendalizzazione della sanità in Italia. Egea, MilanGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tartaglia R, Albolino S, Bellandi T (2005) Il modello toscano per la gestione del rischio clinico. Clin Governance 11:38–43Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vichi MC (2002) Aspetti informatici del monitoraggio dei percorsi. In Casati G, Vichi MC (eds) Il percorso assistenziale del paziente in ospedale. McGraw-Hill, Milan, pp 451–522Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DDEAUniversity of MessinaMessinaItaly

Personalised recommendations