Advertisement

Respecting the Deal: How to Manage Co-opetitive Actors in Open Innovation

  • Riccardo Bonazzi
  • Lotfi Hussami
  • Pius Bienz
  • Yves Pigneur
Conference paper

Abstract

Platforms like E-bay allow product seekers and providers to meet and exchange goods. On the same way in open innovation, as defined by Chesbrough, an enterprise can collect ideas from outside the company. But on E-bay, the seeker can return the product if it does not correspond to the expectations, since E-bay is the third-party actor in charge of assuring that the agreement between seekers and providers will be respected. So who does provide the same service for what concerns open innovation, where specifications might not fully defined? In this paper we shall describe the business model of an organizational structure to support the elicitation and respect of agreements between actors, who have conflicting interests but that gain from cooperating together. The concepts of the model will be illustrated to derive a set of propositions and a simple example will illustrate one of its possible instantiations. The description of our first evaluation phase shall find place at the end.

Keywords

Business Model Open Innovation Service Level Agreement Business Unit Customer Segment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brandenburger AM, Nalebuff BJ (1997) Co-opetition: a revolution mindset that combines competition and cooperation: the game theory strategy that's changing the game of business. Currency, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    West J, Gallagher S (2006) Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Manage 36(3):319–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Simard C, West J (2006) Knowledge networks and geographic locus of innovation. In Chesbrough HW, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (eds) Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doz YL, Hamel G (1998) Alliance advantage: the art of creating value through partnering. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vanhaverbeke W (2006) The inter-organizational context of open innovation. In Chesbrough HW, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (eds) Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wagner S, Layton M (2007) The two faces of risk. Available at http://www.deloitte.com
  7. 7.
    Kahn R, Blair BT (2004) Information nation: seven keys to information management compliance. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee AS (1999) Inaugural editor's comments. MIS Q 23(1):v–xi.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cox RA, Marriott I, Seabrook D (2003) Trust and control: the key to optimal outsourcing relationships. Gartner Inc., StamfordGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hagel J (2002) Leveraged growth: expanding sales without sacrificing profits. Harv Bus Rev 80(10):68–79Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Willcocks LP, Lacity MC, Kern T (1999) Risk mitigation in IT outsourcing strategy revisited: longitudinal case research at LISA. J Strateg Inf Syst 8(3):285–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Tucci CL (2005) Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept. Commun Associat Inf Syst 16(1):1–25Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2006) Strategies for two-sided markets. Harv Bus Rev 84(10):92–101Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bonazzi R, Hussami L, Pigneur Y (2008) Compliance management is becoming a major issue in IS design. In ITAIS 2008 proceedings. Springer, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cullen A (2008) Current practices for IT centers of excellence (CoEs). Forrester Research Inc., WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Volonino L, Gessner GH, Kermis, GF (2004) Holistic compliance with sarbanes-oxley. Commun Associat Inf Syst 14(1):457–468Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cox R, De Jong B (2005) The right retained team is critical for successful outsourcing. Gartner Inc., StamfordGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Joha A (2003) The retained organization after IT outsourcing. The design of its organizational structure. Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management. Delft University of Technology, DelftGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bonazzi R, Pigneur Y (2009) Compliance management in multi-actor contexts. In GRCIS09 proceedings. Amsterdam. Available at http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-459/paper7.pdf
  20. 20.
    Benbasat I, Zmud RW (2003) The identity crisis within the IS discipline: defining and communicating the discipline's core propertie. MIS Q 27(2):183–194Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Riccardo Bonazzi
    • 1
  • Lotfi Hussami
    • 1
  • Pius Bienz
    • 1
  • Yves Pigneur
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Business and Economics, Information Systems InstituteUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations