A System Dynamics Model to Identify and Measure the Paper Digitization Advantages in Public Administration

  • Nunzio Casalino
  • Stefano Armenia
  • Mauro Draoli
Conference paper


This study provides a System Dynamics model built to identify the benefits arising from the process of digitization in the Italian Public Administration. The paper describes the process in terms of the causal relationships between systemic variables that define the underlying structure of the problem. The analysis focuses on the interaction between the “outer world” of the citizens and the “inner world” of the Italian Administrations, by designing a causal loop diagram and a stock and flow simulation model. The systemic approach allows considering many crucial aspects for the digitization problem and provides a rich analysis that shows how those obstacles brought forward by social and psychological factors may become a great obstacle to organizational change.


Administrative Process Document Management Paper Document Digital Document Causal Loop Diagram 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Armenia S, Canini D, Casalino N (2008) A system dynamics approach to the paper dematerialization process in the Italian public administration. In D'Atri et al. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Aspects of Information Systems Studies. Springer, Heidelberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    CNIPA (2006) La dematerializzazione della documentazione amministrativa. Quaderno 24, RomeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    CNIPA (2006) La dematerializzazione della documentazione amministrativa – Libro bianco del Gruppo di lavoro interministeriale per la dematerializzazione della documentazione tramite supporto digitale, RomeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Senge P (1992) The fifth discipline. Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics – system thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin McGraw Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ridolfi P (2007) Dematerializzazione e semplificazione dei procedimenti: l’Innovazione possibile. In Dal protocollo alla conservazione sostitutiva: la gestione efficace di contenuti e processi, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Radzicki MJ (2007) Foundation of system dynamics modeling. Office of Policy and International AffairsGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Casalino N (2008) Gestione del cambiamento e produttività nelle aziende pubbliche. Metodi e strumenti innovativi, Cacucci Editore, BariGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Piano E-gov (2012) Ministero per la pubblica amministrazione e l'innovazioneGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morecroft JDW, Sterman J (2000) Modeling for learning organization. Productivity Press, OregonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bass F (1969) A new product growth model for consumer durables. Manage Sci 15(5):215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burns JR (2002) A matrix architecture for development of system dynamic models. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference System Dynamics Society, Palermo, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burns JR (2002) A component strategy for the formulation of system dynamics model. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference System Dynamics Society, Palermo, ItalyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nunzio Casalino
    • 1
  • Stefano Armenia
    • 2
  • Mauro Draoli
    • 3
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche ed AziendaliUniversità degli Studi “Guglielmo Marconi”RomaItaly
  2. 2.CATTID, Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”RomaItaly
  3. 3.DigitPA, National Centre for Informatics in PARomaItaly

Personalised recommendations