Citizens Participation in Public Decisions: The Open Source Role

  • Lucia Scudu
Conference paper


This article explores the emerging challenges and opportunities of Open Source Software used in Public Sector as an instrument and method to ensure and to encourage citizen participation in public decisions in e-Democracy projects. The main aim is to verify the presence of these projects and to check if they’re realized using Open Source Software and what are the reasons which support this choice. The Open Source can be considered also as an operating model which is used to the development of the software itself. This operating model is based on the democratic principle of sharing information and results, of transparency and participation among community members, in order to achieve common goals. For these characteristics it can be successful used in other fields. The paper will verify, through a research regarding the Italian Regional Administrations how the OSS can be considered a useful operating model that allows to include citizen in public decisions as well as a software.


Public Sector Operating Model Open Source Public Choice Open Source Software 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    von Krogh G, Spaeth S (2007) The open source software phenomenon: characteristics that promote research. J Strateg Inf Syst 16(3):236–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ulhoi JP (2004) Open source development: a hybrid in innovation and management theory. Manage Decis 42(9):1095. ABI/INFORM GlobalCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feller J, Fitzgerald B (2000) A framework analysis of the open source development paradigm. University College Cork, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berry DM, Moss G (2006) Free and open source software: opening and democratising e-government’s black box. Inf Polity 11(1):21–34Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rushkoff D (2003) Open source democracy how online communication is changing offline politics. DEMOS, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jayasena GN, Karunaratna DD (2007) Towards an enabling framework for eDemocracy through the integration of citizen participation along the spatial dimension using free and open source technologies. Spec Issue Int J Comput Internet Manage 15(SP4)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kavanagh E (2006) Citizen auditors-web-enabled, open-source government. Public Manager 35(1):20–25Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brito J (2008) Improving government transparency online. Public Manager 37(1): 22–26Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moynihan DP (2004) Building secure elections: e-voting, security, and systems theory. Public Adm Rev 64(5):515–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rios Insua D, Kersten GE, Rios GC (2008) Towards decision support for participatory democracy, Information Systems and E-Business Management, 6(2):161–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Formez (2004) Linee guida per la promozione della cittadinanza digitale: e-democracy. Supema srlGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gordon TF, Richter G (2002) Discourse support systems for deliberative democracy. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2456:325–334Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schmidt-Belz B, Gordon TF, Voss H (1998) Urban planning with GeoMed first user experiences. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geopraphic Information Systems, (pp.82–87), New York: ACMGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marzano F, Pubblica Amministrazione 2.0? eventi/edemocracy-marzano, Accessed April 2010
  15. 15.
    Manzari V, Il contributo delle nuove tecnologie al processo di e-Demoracy. lano_ottobre2008_a_101.pdf, Accessed April 2010

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CagliariCagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations