Technological and Organizational Structures: A Case of Adaptation in the Archaeological Sector

  • Alessio Maria Braccini
  • Tommaso Federici
Conference paper


In the archaeological sector, information about finds and related documents is highly relevant, but no information system (IS) is available to manage it. Professionals working in the field are often not used to managing information by means of technology and, moreover, work practices are not standardized. The introduction of a new IS to track events and record information in such an environment is therefore a big challenge. An adaptation between technology and organization is then to be expected, in order to find an appropriate form of integration. By adopting a structuration theory perspective, this work analyses the case of a project in which an IS to manage finds was designed, experimented with, discussed, and then developed.


Structuration Theory Final User Initial Inertia Technology Expert Information System Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jones MR, Karsten H (2008) Gidden’s structuration theory and information systems research. MIS Q 32(1):127–157Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Poole MS, DeSanctis G (2004) Structuration theory in information systems research: methods and controversies. In: Whitman ME, Wosczynski AB (eds) The handbook for information systems research (pp.206–249). Idea Group Inc., HersheyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pozzenbon M, Pinsonneault A (2005) Challenges in conducting empirical work using structuration theory: learning from IT research. Org Stud 26(9):1353–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DeSanctis G, Poole MS (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Org Sci 5(2):121–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Markus ML, Silver MS (2008) A foundation for the study of IT effects: a new look at desanctis and poole's concepts of structural features and spirit. JAIS 9(10–11):609–632Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dennis AR, Wixom BH (2002) Investigating the moderators of the group support systems use with meta-analysis. J Manage Inf Syst 18(3):235–257Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rao VS, Jarvenpaa SL (1991) Computer support of groups: theory-based models for GDSS research. Manage Sci 37(19):1347–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Niederman F, Briggs R, de Vreede GJ, Kolfschoten GL (2008) Extending the contextual and organizational elements of adaptive structuration theory in GSS research. JAIS 9(10–11):633–652Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schultze U, Orlikowski WJ (2004). A practice perspective on technology-mediated network relations: the use of internet-based self-serve technologies. Inf Syst Res 15: 87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boudreau MC, Robey D (2005) Enacting integrated information technology: a human agency perspective. Org Sci 16(1):3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Org Sci 11(4):404–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Braccini AM, Federici T (2008) Knowledge sharing in a cultural heritage context: an exploratory study. In: Proceedings of the Mediterranean conference on information systems, MCIS 2008, Hammamet, Tunisia, 24–26 October 2008Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University LUISS Guido CarliRomeItaly
  2. 2.University of TusciaViterboItaly

Personalised recommendations