ERP Acceptance: The Role of Affective Commitment
This study investigates the process of acceptance and use of ERP system by its users. The TAM is used as a starting point for this work. We assume that affective commitment directly also affects both the behavioral intention to ERP system use and it moderates the relationships between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and behavioral intention. A survey methodology was used to gather data from an Italian public transport firm. Findings show the importance of affective commitment in determining acceptance and use behavior by users.
KeywordsPartial Little Square Behavioral Intention Organizational Commitment Technology Acceptance Model Affective Commitment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Davis FD (1986) Technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. MIT: Doctoral dissertation. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 5.Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3):425–478Google Scholar
- 7.Malhotra Y, Galletta DF (1999) Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation. In: Proceedings of the Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los AlamitosGoogle Scholar
- 8.Malhotra Y, Galletta DF (2005) A multidimensional commitment model of volitional systems adoption and usage behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1):117–152.Google Scholar
- 13.Allen NJ, Meyer JP (1990) The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1): 1–18Google Scholar
- 14.Thatcher JB, McKnight DH, Ahuja MK (2002) Thework environment and technology acceptance: the influence of affective commitment, autonomy and trust. Information systems technical reports and working papers.Kellyschool of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
- 17.Abdi H (2003) Partial least squares (PLS) regression. In: M Lewis-Beck M, A Bryman A, T Futing T (eds.), Encyclopedia of social sciences research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 18.Gefen D, Straub T (2000) The relative importance of perceived ease-of-use in IS adoption: a study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(8):1–30Google Scholar
- 19.Ma Q, Liu L (2004) The technology acceptance model: a meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organ and End User Computing, 16(1):59–72.Google Scholar