Selective Assembly for Maximizing Profit in the Presence and Absence of Measurement Error

  • Shun Matsuura
  • Nobuo Shinozaki


Selective assembly is an effective approach for improving the quality of a product assembled from two components when the quality characteristic is the clearance between the mating components. A component is rejected if its dimension is outside specified limits of the dimensional distribution. Acceptable components are sorted into several classes by their dimensions, and the product is assembled from randomly selected mating components from the corresponding classes. We assume that the two component dimensions are normally distributed with equal variance, and that measurement error, if any, is also normally distributed. Taking into account the quality loss of a sold product, the selling price of an assembled product, the component manufacturing cost, and the income from a rejected component, we discuss the optimal partitioning of the dimensional distribution to maximize expected profit, including the optimal choice of the distribution limits or truncation points. Equations for a set of optimal partition limits are given and its uniqueness is established in the presence and absence of measurement error. It is shown that the expected profit based on the optimal partition decreases with increasing variance of the measurement error. In addition, some numerical results are presented to compare the optimal partitions for the cases when the truncation points are and are not fixed.


Quality Loss Optimal Partition Dimensional Distribution Mating Component Selective Assembly 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This research was supported by Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows, 20.381.


  1. 1.
    Dalenius, T. (1950): “The problem of optimal stratification”. Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift, 33, 203-212.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eubank, R.L. (1988): “Optimal grouping, spacing, stratification, and piecewise constant approximation”. SIAM Review, 30, 404-420.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fang, X.D., Zhang, Y. (1995): “A new algorithm for minimizing the surplus parts in selective assembly”. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 28, 341-350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kannan, S.M., Jayabalan, V., Ganesan, S. (1997): “Process design to control the mismatch in selective assembly by shifting the process mean”. Proceedings of International Conference on Quality Engineering and Management, P.S.G. College of Technology, Coimbatore, South India, 85-91.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kannan, S.M., Jayabalan, V. (2001): “A new grouping method for minimizing the surplus parts in selective assembly”. Quality Engineering, 14, 67-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kannan, S.M., Jayabalan, V. (2001): “A new grouping method to minimize surplus parts in selective assembly for complex assemblies”. International Journal of Production Research, 39, 1851-1864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kannan, S.M., Jayabalan, V. (2002): “Manufacturing mean design for selective assembly to minimize surplus parts”. Proceedings of International Conference on Quality and Reliability, I.C.Q.R. RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia, 259-264.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kannan, S.M., Jayabalan, V. (2003): “Genetic algorithm for minimizing assembly variation in selective assembly”. International Journal of Production Research, 41, 3301-3313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kannan, S.M., Asha, A., Jayabalan, V. (2005): “A new method in selective assembly to minimize clearance variation for a radical assembly using genetic algorithm”. Quality Engineering, 17, 595-607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kwon, H.M., Kim, K.J., Chandra, M.J. (1999): “An economic selective assembly procedure for two mating components with equal variance”. Naval Research Logistics, 46, 809-821.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matsuura, S., Shinozaki, N. (2007): “Optimal binning strategies under squared error loss in selective assembly with measurement error”. Communications in Statistics–Theory and Methods, 36(16), 2863-2876.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mease, D., Nair, V.N., Sudjianto, A. (2004): “Selective assembly in manufacturing: Statistical issues and optimal binning strategies”. Technometrics, 46, 165-175.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mease, D., and Nair, V.N. (2006): “Unique optimal partitions of distributions and connections to hazard rates and stochastic ordering”. Statistica Sinica, 16, 1299-1312.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pugh, G.A. (1986): “Partitioning for selective assembly”. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 11, 175-179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pugh, G.A. (1986): “Group formation in selective assembly”. SME Ultratech Conference Proceedings, 2117-2123.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pugh, G.A. (1992): “Selective assembly with components of dissimilar variance”. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 23, 487-491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taguchi, G. (1986): “Introduction to Quality Engineering: Designing Quality into Products and Processes”. Asian Productivity Organization.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tarpey, T., Flury, B. (1996): “Self-consistency: A fundamental concept in statistics”. Statistical Science, 11, 229-243.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Science and TechnologyKeio UniversityYokohamaJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Science and TechnologyKeio UniversityYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations