Skip to main content

The Impact of Teaching Evaluation: Factors that Favour Positive Views from Student Representatives

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Statistical Methods for the Evaluation of University Systems

Part of the book series: Contributions to Statistics ((CONTRIB.STAT.))

  • 877 Accesses

Abstract

The surveying of student opinions on teaching activities was introduced as an evaluation tool in Italian Universities in 1999. The aim of the considerable legislative changes put into place by the Ministry of Universities and Scientific and Technological Research, and the procedural efforts carried out by the National Committee for the Evaluation of University Systems (CNVSU), were to set up a procedure for teaching evaluation, where student opinions were to become one of the key parameters used within universities for “decision-making” purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    At the start of the interview: “Do you think that gathering opinions from at-tending students is useful?”

    At the end of the interview: “Does the gathering of opinions from attending students involve a considerable economic and organizational effort? Do you think that it is useful to use university resources for this activity?”

  2. 2.

    Kolmogorov-Smirnov test has shown that the two dependent variables distribution does not differ significantly from the normal distribution. Also the residual analysis was applied; it has highlighted no violation of regression model assumptions.

References

  1. Campostrini S, Bernardi L, Slanzi D (2008) Le determinanti della didattica attraverso il parere degli studenti. Franco Angeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gerzeli S, Parise N, Campostrini S, Magni C, Bernardi L (2008) L’impatto della valutazione della didattica sull’organizzazione universitaria: il parere dei presidi. In: Capursi V, Ghellini G (eds) Dottor DIVAGO. Discernere, Valutare e Governare la nuova Università. Franco Angeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldstein H (2003) Multilevel statistical models, 3rd edn. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lang J (2001) Improving structural policy under conditions of hybrid governance: multi-actor constellations, integrated feedback instruments and the use of evaluation results. Evaluation 7:7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Snijders T, Bosker R (1999) An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yang M, Goldstein H, Browne W, Woodhouse G (2002) Multivariate multilevel analyses of examination results. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 165(1):137–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Gerzeli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gerzeli, S. (2011). The Impact of Teaching Evaluation: Factors that Favour Positive Views from Student Representatives. In: Attanasio, M., Capursi, V. (eds) Statistical Methods for the Evaluation of University Systems. Contributions to Statistics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2375-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics