Advertisement

Labour Market Performance of University Graduates: Evidence from Italy

  • B. d’Hombres
  • S. Tarantola
  • D. Van Nijlen
Conference paper
Part of the Contributions to Statistics book series (CONTRIB.STAT.)

Abstract

The massification of tertiary education, increased student mobility through the implementation of the Bologna process, the need for economic rationale behind the allocation of public funds and the demand for higher accountability and transparency have all contributed to the growing interest associated with the publication of rankings of higher education institutions. Multiple indicators, ranging from input indicators to process and outcome indicators, are combined into a single index representing overall university “excellence”.1 While, on the one hand, it could be argued that university mission is multidimensional and that it is not possible to condense the diversified work going on within universities into a single number or ranking, on the other hand, for governance purposes, there is an increasing need to be able to measure “excellence”. In addition, academic rankings provide information for comparative assessments which contribute to fostering quality within the academic community. Finally, customers, students and parents can make more informed choices about where to purchase education.

Keywords

Hourly Wage Labor Market Outcome Wage Equation Labor Market Performance Employment Probability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Professor Tuzzi for her review as well as the participants to the 2008 DIVAGO final workshop in Palermo for the useful comments.

References

  1. 1.
    Bagues M, Labini MS, Zinovyeva N (2008) Differential grading standards and university funding: evidence from Italy. Working papers 2008-07, FEDEAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boero B, McKnight A, Naylor R, Smith J (2001) Graduates and graduate labour markets in the UK and Italy. Working paper CRENoS 200111, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, SardiniaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bratti M, McKnight A, Naylor R, Smith J (2004) Higher education outcomes, graduate employment and university performance indicators. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 167(3):475–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brunello G, Cappellari L (2008) The labour market effects of alma mater. evidence from Italy. Econ Educ Rev 27:564–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cappellari L, Lucifora C (2008) The “Bologna Process” and college enrolment decisions. IZA discussion papers 3444, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Card D, Krueger AB (1992) Does school quality matter? Returns to Education and the characteristics of public schools in the United States. J Polit Econ 100(1):1–40, University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cingano F, Cipollone P (2007) University drop-out. The case of Italy. Economic working papers 626, Bank of Italy, Economic Research DepartmentGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    d’Hombres (2007) The impact of university reforms on dropout rates and students’ status: evidence from Italy. JRC Scientific and Technical reports 22733Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Di Pietro G, Cutillo A (2006) University quality and labour market outcomes in Italy. Lab Rev Lab Econ Ind Relat 20(1):37–62Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldstein H, Spiegelhalter D (1996) League tables and their limitations: statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance. J R Stat Soc 159(3):385–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salmi J, Alenoush S (2007) League tables as policy instruments: uses and misuses. J Higher Educ Manage Policy 19(2):24–62Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith JP, McKnight A, Naylor R (1999) Graduate employment outcomes and university performance measures. Econ J 110(464):F382–F411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith J, Naylor R (2001) Determinants of degree performance. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 63:29–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Usher A, Savino M (2006) A world of difference: a global survey of university league tables. Educational Policy Institute, TorontoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Econometrics and Applied Statistics UnitCRELL, Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen European Commission, Joint Research CentreIspraItaly
  2. 2.Econometrics and Applied Statistics UnitCRELLIspraItaly
  3. 3.Centre for Educational Effectiveness and Evaluation, Katholieke UniversiteitLeuvenBelgique

Personalised recommendations