Complex Networks Framework for Valuation in Software Markets

  • Andreas Kemper
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


The examination of the previously designed network effects framework revealed research opportunities by considering properties, dynamics and topologies of networks. The goal of this chapter is to close the identified research gap. Hence, the previously designed network effects framework for valuations in software markets is modified based on the derived insights of the complex networks analysis of customer networks. This modification is achieved in a two step process. First, an overview of the framework and the modifications based on the complex networks research is provided, before the individual phases are described in detail.


Cash Flow Complex Network Real Option Network Effect Software Company 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bassen, A., & Popovic, T. (2004). Die Bewertung von B2C-E-Commerce-Unternehmen. Finanz Betrieb, 838–850.Google Scholar
  2. Berger (2008). Boosting IT efficiency. Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, München.Google Scholar
  3. Bernoulli, D. (1760). Essai d’une nouvelle analyse de la mortalite causee par la petite verole. Memoris of Mathematical and Physical Academy of Royal Science Paris, 1–45. Effect of cowpox inoculation on the spread of smallpox.Google Scholar
  4. Groehn, A. (1997). Ein Modell der Netzeffekte in der Software-Industrie. Number 790. Kiel: The Kiel Institute of World Economics. Network Effects in Software Markets.Google Scholar
  5. Hommel, U., & Pritsch, G. (1999). Marktorientierte Investitionsbewertung mit dem Realoptionsansatz. Finanzmarkt- und Portfoliomanagement,13, 121–144.Google Scholar
  6. Kalkota, R., & Robinson, M. (2001). E-business 2.0: Roadmap for success. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  7. Meffert, H. (2000). Marketing. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  8. Niederdrenk, R., & Maack, B. (2008). Trumpf im Bieterwettbewerb: Die richtige Commercial Due Diligence. M&A Review,5, 229–233.Google Scholar
  9. Porter, M. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review,86, 78–93.Google Scholar
  10. Schwartz, E., & Moon, M. (2000). Rational pricing of internet companies. Financial Analysts Journal,56, 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. von Westarp, F. (2003). Modeling Software Markets - Empirical Analysis, Network Simulations, and Marketing Implications. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Wirtz, J., & Kam, W. (2001). An empirical study on internet-based business-to-business ecommerce in singapore. National University of Singapore,1, 1–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations