Development of Constructs and Related Hypotheses

  • Christine Falkenreck
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


This chapter first gives a short overview of the C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development, followed by a detailed introduction of formative versus reflective measurement models as well as moderating and mediating effects. The requirements of the Bonferroni-Holm’s test are discussed, the development of constructs and related research questions are presented. The structural model of reputation and reputation transfer is introduced. Finally, to find answers on the research questions related to the structural model and the constructs, this chapter gives an overview of the hypotheses developed


Relationship Quality Stakeholder Group Attribute Classification Corporate Reputation Product Range 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aaker DA (1991) Managing brand equity: capitalizing on the value of a brand name. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Aaker DA, Keller KL (1990) Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. J Market 54:27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler P (2002) Market, hierarchy, and trust: the knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. In: Choo CW, Bontis N (eds) The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 23–34Google Scholar
  4. Anderson EW, Mittal V (2000) Strengthening the satisfaction-profit-chain. J Serv Res 3(2):107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson JC, Narus JA (2004) Business market management: understanding, creating and delivering value, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  6. Arndt J (1967) The role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. J Market Res 4(August):291–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Backhaus K, Voeth M (2007) Industriegütermarketing, 8th edn. Vahlen Verlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 6:1173–1182Google Scholar
  9. Batra R, Ray ML (1985) How advertising works at contact. In: Linda A, Mitchall AA (eds) Psychological processes and advertising effects: theory, research, and applications. Eribaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 13–43Google Scholar
  10. Benjamin BB, Podolny JM (1999) Status, quality, and social order in california wine industry. Admin Sci Q 44:563–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bergkvist L, Rossiter JR (2007) The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single item measures of the same constructs. J Market Res 44(May):175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bernstein D (1986) Company image and reality, a critique of corporate communications. Cassell Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Blalock HM (1968) The measurement problem: a gap between the languages of theory and research. In: Blalick HM, Blalock AB (eds) Methodology in social reseach. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 5–27Google Scholar
  14. Bollen KA (1984) Multiple indicators: internal consistency or no necessary relationship? J Qual Quant 18:377–385Google Scholar
  15. Bollen KA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Bollen KA, Lennox R (1991) Conventional wisdom on measurement: a structural equation perspective. Psychol Bull 110(2):305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Borsboom D, Mellenbergh GJ, Heerden JV (2003) The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychol Rev 110(2):203–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brock JK, Zhou Y (2005) Organizational use of the internet – scale development and validation. Internet Res 15(1):67–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bromley DD (1993) Reputation, image and impression management. John Wiley, Chichester, SussexGoogle Scholar
  20. Bruhn M (2003) Relationship marketing. Management of Customer Relationships, Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  21. Churchill GA (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J Market Res 16(3):64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coleman R (1990) Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  23. Collier JE, Bienstock CC (2006) Measuring service quality in E-Retailing. J Serv Res 8(3):260–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coltman T, Devinney M, Midgley D, Venaik S (2008) Formative versus reflective measurement models: two applications of formative measurement. J Bus Res 61(12):1250–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Costner HL (1969) Theory, deduction, and the rules of correspondence. Am J Sociol 75:245–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3):297–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Czellar S (2003) Consumer attitude toward brand extensions: an integrative model and research propositions. Int J Res Market 20(1):97–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dacin PA, Brown TJ (2002) Corporate identity and corporate associations: a framework for future research. Corp Reputation Rev 5(1/2):254–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. de Mooij M (1998) Masculinity/femininity and consumer behavior. In: Hofstede G et al (eds) Masculinity and femininity: the taboo dimension of national cultures. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 55–73Google Scholar
  30. de Ruyter K, Moorman L, Lemmink J (2001) Antecedents of commitment and trust in customer-supplier relationships in high technology markets. Ind Market Manag 30:271–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dellarocas C (2002) The digitization of word-of-mouth: promise and challenges of online reputation mechanisms. Paper of Sloan School of Management,
  32. Dentchev N, Heene A (2004) Managing the reputation of restructuring corporations: send the right signal to the right stakeholder. J Publ Aff 4(1):56–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Deshpandé R, Farley JU (2004) Organizational culture, market orientation, innovativeness, and firm performance: an international research odyssey. Int J Res Market 21(1):3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dholakia UM (2001) A motivational process model of product involvement and consumer risk perception. Eur J Market 35(11/12):1340–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Diamantopoulos A (1999) Viewpoint-export performance measurement: reflective versus formative indicators. Int Market Rev 16(6):444–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Diamantopoulos A (2005) The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing: a comment. Int J Res Market 22:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA (2006) Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: a comparison and empirical illustration. Br J Manag 17:263–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Diamantopoulos A, Winklhofer HM (2001) Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. J Market Res 38(5):269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Diamantopoulos A, Riefler P, Roth KP (2008) Advancing formative measurement models. J Bus Res 61:1066–1200Google Scholar
  40. Doney P, Cannon J (1997) An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. J Market 61(2):35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Dowling G (2001) Creating corporate reputation: identity, image and performance. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Dowling G (2004) Journalists’ evaluation of corporate reputations. Corp Reputation Rev 7(2):196–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Drolet A, Morrison DG (2001) Do we really need multiple-term measures in service research? J Serv Res 3:196–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Dunbar R, Schwalbach J (2000) Corporate reputation and performance in Germany. Paper no. 2000-1, Humboldt Universität Berlin, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Institut für ManagementGoogle Scholar
  45. Eberl M (2006) Unternehmensreputation und Kaufverhalten. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  46. Edwards JR, Bagozzi RP (2000) On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychol Methods 5(2):155–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Eggert A, Fassott G, Helm S (2005) Identifizierung und Quantifizierung mediierender und moderierender Effekte in komplexen Kausalstrukturen. In: Bliemel F, Eggert A, Fassott G, Henseler J (eds) Handbuch PLS-Pfadmodellierung: Methode, Anwendung, Praxisbeispiele. Schäfer-Poeschel Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 101–116Google Scholar
  48. EIU (2007) The 2007 e-readiness rankings. Economist Intelligence Unit. Available at Accessed 27 Feb 2008
  49. Finn A, Kayande U (2004) How fine is C-OAR-SE? A generalizability theory perspective on Rossiter’s procedure. Int J Res Market 19:305–335Google Scholar
  50. Firth-Cozens J (2004) Organisational trust: the keystone to patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 13:56–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  52. Fiske ST (1982) Schema-triggered affect: application to social perception. In: Clark MS, Fiske ST (eds) Affect and cognition: the 17th annual carnegie symposium on cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 55–78Google Scholar
  53. Fombrun CJ (1996) Realizing value from the corporate image. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  54. Fombrun CJ (2001) Corporate reputation – its measurements and management. Thexis 18(4):327–340Google Scholar
  55. Fombrun CJ, Gardberg NA (2002) The global reputation quotient project: first steps towards a cross-nationally valid measure of corporate reputation. Corp Reputation Rev 4(4):303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Fombrun CJ, Rindova V (1998) Reputation management in 1000 global firms, a benchmarking study. Corp Reputation Rev 1(3):205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Fombrun CJ, Shanley M (1990) What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Acad Manag J 33(2):233–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Fombrun CJ, Gardberg NA, Sever J (2000) The reputation quotient: a multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. J Brand Manag 7(4):241–255Google Scholar
  59. Forman J, Argenti P (2005) How corporate communication influences strategy implementation, reputation and the corporate brand: an exploratory qualitative study. Corp Reputation Rev 8(3):245–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Fornell C (1987) A second generation of multivariate analysis: classification of methods and implications for marketing research. In: Houston M (ed) Review of marketing. American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, pp 407–450Google Scholar
  61. Fornell C, Bookstein FL (1982) Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J Market Res 14(6):440–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Fornell C, Lorange P, Roos J (1990) The cooperative venture formation process: a latent variable structural modeling approach. Manag Sci 36(10):1246–1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Friman M, Gärling T, Millett B, Mattson J (2002) An analysis of international business-to-business relationships in the commitment-trust theory. Ind Market Manag 31:403–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ganesan S (1994) Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. J Market 58(2):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Gardberg N (2001) How do individuals construct corporate reputations? Dissertation, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Gardberg N (2006) Reputatie, reputation, réputation, reputazione, ruf: a cross-cultural qualitative analysis of construct and instrument equivalence. Corp Reputation Rev 9:39–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Gensch DH, Javalgi RG (1987) The influence of involvement on disaggregate attribute choice models. J Consum Res 14(1):71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Giering A (2000) Der Zusammenhang zwischen Kundenzufriedenheit und Kundenloyalität: Eine Untersuchung moderierender Effekte. Gabler, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  69. Gordon GL, Calantone RJ, di Benedetto CA (1993) Brand equity in the business-to-business sector: an exploratory study. J Product Brand Manage 2(3):4–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Gotsi M, Wilson AM (2001) Corporate reputation: seeking a definition corporate communications. Int J 6(1):24–30Google Scholar
  71. Grewal D, Krishnan R, Baker J, Borin N (1998) The effect of store name, brand name and price discounts on consumers’ evaluations and purchase intentions. J Retailing 74(3):331–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Griffin K (1975) The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication department. Psychol Bull 68:104–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Griffith DA, Myers M, Harvey MG (2006) An investigation of national culture’s influence on relationship and knowledge resources in interorganizational relationships between Japan and the United States. J Int Market 14(3):1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Grönroos C (2000) Service management and marketing, 2nd edn. John Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  75. Helgenson GJ, Kluge EA, Mager J, Taylor C (1984) Trends in consumer behaviour literature: a content analysis. J Consum Res 10:449–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Helm S (2006) Common grounds in the perception of corporate reputation? A comparison of three stakeholder groups. Paper presented at the 10th Reputation Institute Conference. New York, USA, May 25–28, 2006Google Scholar
  77. Helm S (2007) Unternehmensreputation und Stakeholder-Loyalität, Neue Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Bd. 356, Deutscher UniversitätsverlagGoogle Scholar
  78. Hennig-Thurau T, Hansen U (2001) Kundenartikulation im Internet. Die Betriebswirtschaft 61(5):3–38Google Scholar
  79. Ho S-C, Kauffman RJ, Liang T-P (2007) A growth theory perspective on B2C E-commerce growth in Europe: an exploratory study. Electron Commer Res Appl 6(3):237–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Hochberg Y (1988) A sharper bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75:800–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  82. Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations, 2nd edn. Sage, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  83. Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70Google Scholar
  84. Homburg C, Giering A (2001) Personal characteristics as moderators of the relationship between customer satisfaction and loyalty-an empirical analysis. Psychol Market 18(1):43–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Homburg C, Krohmer H, Workman J (2004) A strategy implementation perspective of market orientation. J Bus Res 57:1331–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Homburg C, Kuester S, Beutin N, Menon A (2005) Determinants of customer benefits in business-to-business markets: a cross-cultural comparison. J Int Market 13(3):1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Houston MJ, Rothschild ML (1978) Conceptual and methodological perspectives in involvement". In: Jain SC (ed) Research frontiers in marketing: dialogues and directions. American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, pp 184–187Google Scholar
  88. Huff L, Kelley L (2003) Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist societies: a seven-nation study. Organ Sci 14(1):81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Jarvis CB, Mackenzie SB, Podsakoff PM (2003) A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J Consum Res 30(3):199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Karaosmanoglu E, Melewar TC (2006) Corporate communications, identity and image: a research agenda. Corp Reputation Rev 14(1/2):196–206Google Scholar
  91. Keller KL (1993) Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity. J Market 57(1):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Keller KL (2003) Building, measuring, and managing brand equity, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  93. Klink RR, Smith DC (2001) Threats to the external validity of brand extension research. J Market Res 38:326–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Krathwohl DR (1985) Social and behavioral science research, Jossey bass social and behavioral science series. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  95. Kroeber-Riel W, Weinberg P (2003) Konsumentenverhalten, 8th edn. Franz Vahlen, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  96. Krugman HE (1965) The impact of television advertising: learning without involvement. Public Opin Q 29(3):349–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Kuhn K, Alpert F (2004) Applying Keller’s brand equity model in a B2B Context: limitations and an empirical test. Paper presented at the 2004 ANZMAC Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference. Available at
  98. Kumar P (2005) Brand counterextensions: the impact of brand extension success versus failure. J Market Res 62(May):183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Law KS, Wong C (1999) Multidimensional constructs in structural equation analysis: an illustration using the job perception and job satisfaction constructs. J Manag 25:143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Lee N, Lings I (2007) Doing business research-a guide to theory and practice. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  101. Lin CH, Sher PJ, Shih HY (2005) Past progress and future directions in conceptualizing customer perceived value. Int J Serv Industry Manag 16(4):318–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Lord FM, Novick MR (1968) Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Wesely, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  103. Lutz RJ (1985) Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude toward the Ad: a conceptual framework. In: Linda FA, Andrew AM (eds) Psychological processes and advertising effects: theory, research, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 45–63Google Scholar
  104. MacMillan K, Money K, Downing S, Hillenbrand C (2005) Reputation in relationships: measuring experiences, emotions and behaviors. Corp Reputation Rev 8(3):214–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Madrigal R (2000) The role of corporate associations in new product evaluations. Adv Consum Res 27(1):80–86Google Scholar
  106. Mann A (2004) Dialogmarketing: Konzeption und empirische Befunde. Gabler Verlag, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  107. McGuire J, Schneeweis T, Branch B (1990) Perceptions of firm quality: a cause or a result of firm performance. J Manag 16(1):167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Meffert H, Bierwirth A (2002) Corporate Branding-Führung der Unternehmensmarke im Spannungsfeld unterschiedlicher Zielgruppen. In: Meffert H, Burmann C, Koers M (eds) Markenmanagement. Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp 181–200Google Scholar
  109. Miller RG (1981) Simultaneous statistical inference. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  110. Mittal B (1989) A theoretical analysis of two recent measures of involvement. In: Thomas KS (ed) Advances in consumer research association for consumer research, vol 16. Provo, UT, pp 697–702Google Scholar
  111. Mittal B, Lee M (1989) A causal model of consumer involvement. J Econ Psychol 12(17):363–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Moorman C, Zaltman G, Deshpandé R (1992) Relationship between providers and users of marketing research: the dynamics of trust within and between organizations. J Market Res 29:314–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Moran MD (2003) Arguments for rejecting the sequential bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos 100(2):403–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Morgan RM, Hunt SD (1994) The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J Market 58:20–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Negandhi AR (1983) Cross-cultural management research, trend and future directions. J Int Bus Stud 14(2):17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Nunally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  117. O’Cass A (2000) An assessment of consumers product purchase decision, advertising and consumption involvement in fashion clothing. J Econ Psychol 21:343–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Palmatier RW, Dant R, Grewal D, Evans K (2006) Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: a meta-analysis. J Market 70:136–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1988) SERVQUAL: a multiple item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retailing 64(1):12–40Google Scholar
  120. Park CW, Lawson R, Milberg S (1989) Memory structure of brand names. In: Srull T (ed) Advances in consumer research, vol 16. Association for Consumer Research, UT, pp 726–731Google Scholar
  121. Park CW, Milberg S, Lawson R (1991) Evaluation of brand extension: the role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency. J Consum Res 18:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1981) Attitudes and persuasion: classic and contemporary approaches. William C. Brown, Dubuque, IAGoogle Scholar
  123. Ranaweera C, Prabhu J (2003) Customer satisfaction and trust as determinants of customer retention and positive word of mouth. J Target Meas Anal Market 12(1):82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Rauyruen P, Miller K (2005) Relationship quality as a predictor of B2B customer loyalty. J Bus Res 60:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. J Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Richins ML, Bloch PH (1991) Post-purchase product satisfaction: incorporating the effect of involvement and time. J Bus Res 23:145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Rindova V, Fombrun C (1999) Constructing competitive advantage: the role of firm-constituent interactions. Strat Manag J 20:691–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Rindova V, Williamson I, Petkova A (2005) Being good or being known: an empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Acad Manag J 48(6):1033–1049Google Scholar
  129. Roberts PW, Dowling GR (2002) Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strat Manag J 23:1077–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Ronen S (1986) Comparative and multinational management. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  131. Rosenzweig PM (1994) When can management science reseach be generalized internationally? Manag Sci 40:28–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Rossiter J (2002) The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. Int J Res Market 19:305–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Sanchez-Pérez M, Iniesta-Bonillo M (2004) Consumers felt commitment towards retailers: index development and validations. J Bus Psychol 19(2):141–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Schwager JH (2004) Markenerweiterung, Working Paper No. 145, FGM Verlag, MunichGoogle Scholar
  135. Schwaiger M (2004) Components and parameters of corporate reputation-an empirical study. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 56:46–71Google Scholar
  136. Schwalbach J (2002) Unternehmensreputation als Erfolgsfaktor. In: Rese M, Söllner A, Utzig B (eds) Relationship Marketing – Standortbestimmung und Perspektiven. Springer, Berlin, pp 225–238Google Scholar
  137. Schweizer T, Wijnberg N (1999) Transferring reputation to the corporation in different cultures: individuals, collectives, systems and the strategic management of corporate reputation. Corp Reputation Rev 2(3):249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Shapiro SD, Macinnis DJ, Heckler SE (1997) The effect of incidental and exposure on the formation of consideration sets. J Consum Res 24(1):94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Sharpiro C (1982) Consumer information product quality and seller reputation. Bell J Econ 13:20–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Shimp TA (1982) Thoughts on the concept of involvement. Unpublished Working Paper, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SCGoogle Scholar
  141. Simon HA (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ Sci 2:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Skowronski JJ, Carlston DE (1989) Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: a review of explanations. Psychol Bull 105(1):131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Smith DC, Park CW (1992) The effects of brand extensions on market share and advertising efficiency. J Market Res 29(3):296–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Smith RE, Swinyard WR (1982) Information response models: an integrated approach. J Market 46:81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Srite M, Karahanna E (2006) The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Q 30(3):679–704Google Scholar
  146. Steenkamp J-B, ter Hofstede F, Wedel M (1999) A cross-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. J Market 63(2):55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Swedberg R (2000) The social science view of entrepreneurship: introduction and practical applications. In: Swedberg R (ed) Entrepreneurship the social science view. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  148. Tauber EM (1981) Brand franchise extension: new product benefits from existing brand names. Bus Horiz 24:36–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Tversky A (1977) Features of similarity. Psychol Rev. 84:327–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. von Wangenheim F (2003) Weiterempfehlung und Kundenwert. Deutscher Universitätsverlag, GWV Fachverlage GmbH, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  151. von Wangenheim F, Bayón T (2007) The chain from customer satisfaction via word-of-mouth referrals to new customer acquisition. J Acad Market Sci 35:233–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Walsh G, Wiedmann K-P (2004) A conceptualization of corporate reputation in germany: an evaluation and extension of the RQ. Corp Reputation Rev 6(4):304–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Webster FE (1992) The changing role of marketing in the corporation. J Market 56:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Wiedmann K-P (2004) RQ Deutschland 2004, erste Ergebnisse und Einschätzungen sowie relevante Kontaktdaten. Universität Hannover, ArbeitspapierGoogle Scholar
  155. Wieseke J, Homburg C, Lee N (2008) Understanding the adoption of new brands through salespeople: a multilevel framework. J Acad Market Sci 36:278–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Witt K, Witt F-J (2008) Managers Methodenwind. Controller Magazin, May/June, pp 18–22Google Scholar
  157. Zaichkowsky JL (1985) Measuring the involvement construct. J Consum Res 12(3):341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Zaykin DV, Zhivotovsky LA, Westfall PH, Weir BS (2002) Truncated product method for combining p-values. Genet Epidemiol 22(2):170–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Zinkham GM, Munderrisoglu A (1985) Involvement, familiarity, cognitive differentiation, and advertising recall: a test of convergent and discriminant validity. Adv Consum Res 12(1):356–361Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Head of International Marketing ResearchUniversity of KasselKasselGermany

Personalised recommendations