Advertisement

Future Directions of Quality Perception

  • Lalit Wankhade
  • Balaji Dabade
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

The prevailing literature on information economics, marketing science, business studies, and quality management revealed the commonality and the gaps on quality perception. Basic theory building process that links all these disciplines is completed and sufficient instruments, to contain quality uncertainty or to promote quality perception, are formulated in the earlier chapters. Though the developed tools follow the scientific method of enquiry to make their validity easier, the further refining to the measure of quality perception is still possible. Hence, avenues are opened in this chapter for the future work on quality perception.

Keywords

Information Asymmetry Product Life Cycle System Dynamic Model Quality Perception Information Economic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aaker DA, Jacobson R (1994) The financial information content of perceived quality. J Mark Res 31(2):191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akerlof G (1970) The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and market mechanism. Q J Econ 84(3):485–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali A, Seshadri S (1993) Customer perception and competitive quality strategy. Managerial Decis Econ 14(3):235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown JA (1995) Perceptions of quality in the global market. TQM Mag 7(6):52–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(10):297–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garvin D (1984) What does product quality really means? Sloan Manage Rev 26(1):25–43Google Scholar
  7. Hellofs LL, Jacobson R (1999) Market share and customers’ perceptions of quality: when can firms grow their way to higher versus lower quality? J Mark 63(1):16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Morgan NA, Piercy NF (1998) Interactions between marketing and quality at the SBU level: influences and outcomes. J Acad Mark Sci 26(3):190–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml V, Berry L (1988) SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retailing 64(1):12–40Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SGGS Institute of Engineering & Technology Dept. Production EngineeringNandedIndia

Personalised recommendations