Dynamics of Quality Perception

  • Lalit Wankhade
  • Balaji Dabade
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


This chapter provides framework, modeling, and analysis for quality perception by using system dynamics (SD). The role of the changing level of market-side enablers on quality perception is observed. To realize the impact of information asymmetry on quality perception, simulation runs are carried out for an Indian case. Enablers, such as advertising, word-of-mouth, rebate, warranty and guarantee, mitigate the effect of information asymmetry on quality perception and commensurately translate TQM to market value. Similarly, the position of high quality products (HQPs) is focused in SD modeling and analysis. Also, an attempt is made to unfold the prevailing parametric relationships in the market of developed and developing nations. Simulation runs are carried out to assess the impact of company reputation and advertising on market parameters. From using correlation analysis and analytic hierarchy approach, the policy measures to improve the HQP position in the market are revealed. The SD model has a practical relevance to implement quality perception enhancement by deciding on the policy mix.


Information Asymmetry Quality Perception Market Dynamic Market Niche Parametric Relationship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Badri AM, Davis D (1995) A study of measuring the critical factors of quality management. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 12(2):36–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bass F (1969) A new product growth model for consumer durables. Manage Sci 15(5):215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bass F, Krishnan T, Jain D (1994) Why the bass model fits without decision variables. Mark Sci 13(3):203–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis JP, Bingham CB, Eisenhardt KM (2007) Developing theory through simulation methods. Acad Manage Rev 32(2):580–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dybvig PH, Spatt CS (1983) Does it pay to maintain a reputation? Consumer information and product quality. Yale University, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  6. Fombrun CJ (1996) Reputation: realizing value from the corporate image. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Forrester JW (1961) Industrial dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  8. Forrester JW (1968) Principles of systems. Pegasus Communications, Waltham, MAGoogle Scholar
  9. Forrester JW (1969) Urban dynamics. Pegasus Communications, Waltham, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. Forrester JW (1971) World dynamics. Pegasus Communications, Waltham, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Fudenberg D, Kreps DM (1987) Reputation in the simultaneous play of multiple opponents. Rev Econ Stud 54(4):541–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fudenberg D, Levine D (1992) Maintaining a reputation when strategies are imperfectly observed. Rev Econ Stud 59(3):561–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gonzalez ME, Quesada G, Mueller R (2004) QFD strategy house: an innovative tool for linking marketing and manufacturing strategies. Mark Intell Plan 22(3):335–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horner J (1999) Reputation and competition. CARESS Working paper, 99–02Google Scholar
  15. Iyer G, Soberman D, Villas-Boas JM (2005) The targeting of advertising. Mark Sci 24(3):461–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jagadeesh R (1999) Total quality management in India – perspective and analysis. TQM Mag 11(5):321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jermain E (1963) Problems in industrial dynamic. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  18. Joseph IN, Rajendran C, Kamalanabhan TJ (1999) An instrument for measuring total quality management implementation in manufacturing – based business units in India. Int J Prod Res 37(10):2201–2215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khanna VK, Vrat P, Shankar R, Sahay BS (2004) Managing transition phases in the TQM journey: a system dynamics approach. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 21(5):518–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mitra D, Golder PN (2006) How does objective quality affect perceived quality? Short-term effects, long-term effects, and asymmetries. Mark Sci 25(3):230–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moorman C (1998) Market-level effects of information: competitive responses and consumer dynamics. J Mark Res 35(2):82–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moorman C (2005) The effect of standardized information on firm survival and marketing strategies. Mark Sci 24(2):263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Motwani J (2001) Critical factors and performance measures of TQM. TQM Mag 13(4):292–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Park C-H, Kim Y-G (2003) A framework of dynamic CRM: linking marketing with information strategy. Bus Proc Manage J 9:652–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shapiro C (1982) Consumer information, product quality, and seller reputation. Bell J Econ 13(1):20–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shapiro C (1983) Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputation. Q J Econ 98(4):659–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sice P, Mosekilde E, Moscardini A, Lawler K, French I (2000) Using system dynamics to analyze interactions in duopoly competition. Syst Dyn Rev 16(2):113–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  29. Tellis GJ, Fornell C (1988) The relationship between advertising and product quality over the product life cycle: a contingency theory. J Mark Res 25(1):64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tellis GJ (1988) Advertising exposure, loyalty, and brand purchase: a two-stage model of choice. J Mark Res 25(2):134–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tellis GJ (1989) The impact of corporate size and strategy on competitive pricing. Strateg Manage J 10(6):569–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tellis GJ, Prabhu J (2000) Do consumers ever learn? Analysis of segment behavior in experimental markets. J Behav Decis Mak 3(1):19–34Google Scholar
  33. Tellis GJ, Chandy RK, MacInnis D, Thaivanich P (2005) Modeling the microeffects of television advertising, which ad works, when, where, for how long, and why? Mark Sci 24(3):351–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vojtko V, Mildeova S, Trojasek J, Nemecova I (2006) Market dynamics for decision support in marketing. 24th international conference of the system dynamics society, System Dynamics Society, Nijmejen, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  35. Weick KE (1989) Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Acad Manage Rev 14(4):516–531Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SGGS Institute of Engineering & Technology Dept. Production EngineeringNandedIndia

Personalised recommendations