Advertisement

Discussion and Conclusions

  • Ina Ehnert
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

This conceptual and exploratory study on Sustainable HRM has aimed at extending the emerging literature linking sustainability and HR issues and linking the discourses on Strategic HRM and sustainability to the organisational debate on paradox theory.

Keywords

Europe Metaphor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Atteslander P (2003) Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, 10th edn. de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. Bechara J, Van de Ven AH (2006) What philosophy of science do you practice? Draft: January 25, 2006. In: Van de Ven AH (ed) Engaged scholarship: creating knowledge for science and practice. Book outline. Calson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Accessed via http://webpages.csom.umn.edu/smo/avandeven/AHVHOME.htm, June, 15, 2006
  3. Brewster C, Suutari V (2005) Guest editorial. Global HRM: aspects of a research agenda. Pers Rev 43(1):5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bunge MA (1967) Scientific research, vol I und II. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. Czarniawska B (2003) Forbidden knowledge: organization theory in times of transition. Manage Learn 34(3):353–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (2005a) The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  7. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (2005b) Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 1–33Google Scholar
  8. Donaldson L (2005) For positive management theories while retaining science: reply to Ghoshal. Acad Manage Learn Educ 4(1):109–113Google Scholar
  9. Dörner D (1994) Heuristik der Theorienbildung. In: Herrmann T, Tack W (eds) Methodologische Grundlagen der Psychologie. Hogrefe, Göttingen, pp 343–388Google Scholar
  10. Ehnert I (2006a) Sustainability issues in human resource management: linkages, theoretical approaches, and outlines for an emerging field. Paper presented at 21st EIASM Workshop on SHRM, 30–31 March 2006, BirminghamGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans PAL (1999) HRM on the edge: a duality perspective. Organization 6(2):325–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fontana A, Frey JH (2005) The interview: from neutral stance to political involvement. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 695–727Google Scholar
  13. Friedman TL (2000) The Lexus and the olive tree. Anchor Books/Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Gapper J (2005) Comment on Sumantra Ghoshal's ‘Bad management theories are destroying good management practices’. Acad Manage Learn Educ 4(1):101–103Google Scholar
  15. Ghoshal S (2005) Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Acad Manage Learn Educ 4(1):75–91Google Scholar
  16. Gioia DA (2003) Give it up! Reflections on the interpreted world (a commentary on Meckler and Baillie). J Manage Inq 12(3):285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gooderham PN, Nordhaug O, Ringdal K (1999) Institutional and rational determinants of organizational practices: human resource management in European firms. Adm Sci Q 44:507–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hambrick DC (2005) Just how bad are our theories? A response to Ghoshal. Acad Manage Learn Educ 4(1):104–107Google Scholar
  19. Hardy C, Phillips N, Clegg S (2001) Reflexivity in organization and management theory: a study of the production of the research ‘subject’. Hum Relat 54(5):531–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hartman LP, Rubin RS, Dhanda KK (2007) The communication of corporate social responsibility: United States and European Union multinational corporations. J Bus Ethics 74:373–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoff E-H, Grote S, Dettmer S, Hohner H-U, Olos L (2005) Work–life-balance: Berufliche und private Lebensgestaltung von Frauen und Männern in hoch qualifizierten Berufen. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 49(4):196–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huselid M (1995) The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Acad Manage J 38(3):635–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacobshagen N, Amstad FT, Semmer NK, Kuster M (2005) Work–family-balance im Topmanagement: Konflikt zwischen Arbeit und Familie als Mediator der Beziehung zwischen Stressoren und Befinden. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 49(4):208–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klimoski R (1991) Theory presentation in human resource management. Hum Resou Manage Rev 1(4):253–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Legge K (1995) Human resource management: rhetorics and realities. Palgrave, HoundmillsGoogle Scholar
  26. Legge K (2005) Human resource management: rhetorics and realities, Anniversary edn. Palgrave MacMillan, HampshireGoogle Scholar
  27. Meckler M, Baillie J (2003a) The truth about social construction in administrative science. J Manage Inq 12(3):273–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mintzberg H (2005) How inspiring. How sad. Comment on Sumantra Ghoshal's paper. Acad Manage Learn Educ 4(1):108Google Scholar
  29. Opp K-D (2002) Methodologie der Sozialwissenschaften: Einführung in Probleme ihrer Theorienbildung und praktischen Anwendung, 5th edn. Westdeutscher, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  30. Paauwe J (2004) HRM and performance: achieving long-term viability. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Pfeffer J (1998) The human equation: building profits by putting people first. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  32. Pfeffer J (2005a) Changing mental models: HR's most important task. Hum Resou Manage 44(2):123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pfeffer J (2005b) Why do bad management theories persist? A comment on Ghoshal. Acad Manage Learn Educ 4(1):96–100Google Scholar
  34. Poelmans S, Sahibzada K (2004) A multi-level model for studying the context and impact of work-family policies and culture in organizations. Hum Resou Manage Rev 14(4):409–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roehling MV, Boswell WR, Caligiuri P, Feldman D, Grahman ME, Guthrie JP, Morishima M, Tansky JW (2005) The future of HR management: research needs and directions. Hum Resour Manage 44(2):207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rudow B (2004) Das gesunde Unternehmen. Gesundheitsmanagement, Arbeitsschutz und Personalpflege in Organisationen. Oldenbourg, MünchenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Starbuck WH (2004) Why I stopped trying to understand the real world. Organ Stud 25(7): 1233–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Steffgen G (2004) Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung: Problembezogene psychologische Interventionen. Verlag für Angewandte Psychologie, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  39. Styhre A (2005) Management writing out of bounds: writing after postcolonialism. Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press, MalmöGoogle Scholar
  40. Ulich E, Wülser M (2004) Gesundheitsmanagement im Unternehmen: Arbeitspsychologische Perspektiven, 1st edn. Gabler, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  41. Ulrich D (1997) Human resource champions: the next agenda for adding value and delivering results. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  42. Van de Ven AH (2006) Engaged scholarship: creating knowledge for science and practice. Book outline. Accessed via http://webpages.csom.umn.edu/smo/avandeven/AHVHOME.htm, 15 June 2006. The printed version was published in 2007: Engaged scholarship: a guide for organizational and social research. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  43. Weick KE (1999) Theory construction as disciplined reflexivity: tradeoffs in the 90s. Acad Manage Rev 24(4):797–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilhelmson L, Sena JB (2002) Sustainability in a rapidly changing environment. In: Docherty P, Forslin J, Shani ABR (eds) Creating sustainable work systems. Emerging perspectives and practice. Routledge, London, pp 101–113Google Scholar
  45. Wright PM, Nishii LH (2006) Strategic HRM and organizational behavior: integrating multiple levels of analysis. Working Paper 06–05, CAHRS Working Paper Series, Cornell UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations