Advertisement

Changing Time Orientations in Organizations: A Role for ICT?

  • D. Isari
  • M. De Marco
Chapter

Abstract

Despite its importance to temporal issues, research into the temporal impacts of information technology in organizations is still limited. On the other hand, organizational culture research shows that the way time is perceived and collectively organized reflects assumptions that are an expression of the specific organizational setting, underscoring that cultural assumptions are an important contributory factor to the strength and direction of organizational change. In this contribution, we have investigated the role ICT can play in promoting changes in the temporal dimension of organizational culture, and sought to assess whether temporal assumptions can affect the way a new system is used, thus facilitating/hindering the achievement of the expected results. Our case study covered the four types of ‘temporal performance’ management expected to see thanks to the introduction of a workflow system and showed that, after its introduction, the temporal dimensions of the organizational culture of the departments involved showed some significant changes, which confirm hypothesis 1 of the study, but also some contradictory effects that seem to confirm hypothesis 2.

Keywords

Temporal Performance Temporal Dimension Organizational Unit Temporal Impact Cultural Assumption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee H. and Whitley E. (2002). Time and Information technology: temporal impacts on Individuals, organizations and society. The Information Society 18: 235–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sahay, S. (1998). Implementing GIS technology in India: some issues of time and space. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 8: 147–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee H. and Liebenau J. (2000). Temporal effects of Information Systems on business processes: focusing on the dimensions of temporality. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 10: 157–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Orlikowski W.J. and Yates J. (2002). It’s about time: temporal structuring in organizations. Organization Science. 13(6):684–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sawyer S., Southwick R. (2002) Temporal issues in information and communication technology-enabled organizational change: evidence from an enterprise system implementation. The Information Society 18:263–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scott S.V., Wagner E.L. (2003). Networks, negotiations and new times: the implementation of ERP into an academic administration. Information and Organization 13: 285–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sarker S., Sahay S. (2004) Implications of space and time for distributed work: an interpretive study of US-Norwegian systems development teams. European Journal of IS 13: 3–20Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prasopoulou, E., Pouloudi, A, Panteli, N. (2006). Enacting new temporal boundaries: the role of mobile phones. European Journal of IS 15: 277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hofstede,G. (1991). Cultures and organizations. Mc Graw Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schein E.H. (1988) Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schriber J.B., Gutek B.A. (1987) Some time dimensions of work: Measurement of an underlying aspect of organization culture. Journal of Applied Psychology 72(4):642–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barley S.R. (1988). On technology, time, and social order: Technically induced change in the temporal organization of radiological work. In Making Time: Ethnographies of High Technology Organizations. F.A. Dubinskas (ed.): 123–169. Temple University Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zerubavel E. (1979). Patterns of time in hospital life. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lawrence P.R., Lorsch J.W. (1967). Organization and environment:managing differentiation and integration. Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration, BostonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gherardi S., Strati A. (1988). The temporal dimension in organizational studies. Organization Studies 9(2): 149–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bluedorn A.C. et al. (1998) Polychronicity and the inventory of polychromic values (IVP). Journal of managerial psychology 14(3/4): 205–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ancona D. et al. (2001a) Time: A new research lens. AOM Review 26(4):645–663Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Benbasat, I. et al. (1987). The Case Research Strategy in Studies of IS. MIS Quarterly 1(3): 369–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yin R.K. (2003). Case Study Research, Design and Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations